Skip to main content

An Analysis and Comparison of Behavioral Assumptions in Traffic Assignment

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 118))

Abstract

This paper compares modeling of traffic flow on networks in such a manner that total user cost is minimized with the modeling of flow so that an equilibrium is achieved. A detailed comparison of the output from these two models is presented for a 76 arc, 24 node sketch planning network used to model the city of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The results indicate that the difference between the two sets of flows is small enough to justify the simplifying assumption that total user cost is minimized. Such an assumption is often made in network design or link addition models to achieve computational ease, particularly in the context of multiple objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckmann, M., McGuire, C.B. and Winsten, C., Studies in the Economics of Transportation, New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Comsis Corporation, Traffic Assignment; Methods-Applications-Products. Prepared for Urban Planning Division, Office of Planning, Federal Highway Administration, Preliminary- Subject to Review (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dreyfus, S.E., “An Appraisal of Some Shortest Path Algorithms”, Operations Research, 394–412 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson, L.F. et al., “Equilibrium Models”, Search and Choice in Transport System Planning, Vol. IX, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. LeBlanc, L.J., “Mathematical Programming Algorithms for Large Scale Network Equilibrium and Network Design Problems”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. LeBlanc, L.J., Morlok, E,K, and Pierskalla, W.P., “An Accurate and Efficient Approach to Equilibrium Traffic Assignment on Congested Networks”, Transportation Research Record 491 - Interactive Graphics and Transportation Systems Planning, 12–33, (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, B.V. and Manheim, M.L., “A Research Program for Comparison of Traffic Assignment Techniques”, Highway Research Record 88, 69–84 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murchland, J.D., “Braess’ Paradox of Traffic Flow”, Transportation Research 391–394 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

LeBlanc, L.J., Morlok, E.K. (1976). An Analysis and Comparison of Behavioral Assumptions in Traffic Assignment. In: Florian, M.A. (eds) Traffic Equilibrium Methods. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48123-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48123-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-07620-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48123-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics