Skip to main content

Kernspintomographie in der Schwangerschaft

  • Conference paper
Geburtshilfe — Geburtsmedizin
  • 78 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Bildgebung mit Hilfe der Kernspintomographie beruht auf den magnetischen Eigenschaften von Atomkernen. Atome bestehen aus einem Atomkern und einer Hülle aus Elektronen. Die Atomkerne sind positiv geladen, die Elektronen nega tiv. Atome mit einer ungeraden Anzahl an Protonen und Neutronen haben die Eigenschaft, daß ihr Atomkern ständig um seine Achse rotiert. Diese Rotationsbewegung bezeichnet man als Spin. Folge der Rotationsbewegung der Atomkerne ist eine ständige Bewegung der auf ihnen verteilten Ladungen. Bewegte Ladungen werden immer von einem Magnetfeld begleitet, so auch im Falle dieser Atomkerne. Bei der Bildgebung mit der Kernspintomographie benutzt man die magnetischen Eigenschaften von Wasserstoffatomkernen, die nur aus einem einzelnen Proton bestehen. Gewebe besteht nun aus einer großen Anzahl von Protonen. Im Normalfall zeigen die Magnetfelder dieser Protonen in alle beliebigen Raumrichtungen. Die magnetischen Kräfte heben sich untereinander auf.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barton JW ,McCarthy SM, Kohorn EJ, Scoutt LM, Lange RC (1993) Pelvic MR imaging findings in gestational trophoblastic disease, incomplete abortion and ectopic pregnancy: are they specific? Radiology 186: 163–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop E, Cefalo R (1983) Signs and symptoms of pregnancy. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 78–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan R, Hadley D, Bone I et al. (1989) Blindness in eclampsia CT and MR imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 899–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleischer A (1978): Differential diagnosis of pelvic masses by gray scale sonography. AJR 31: 469

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foster MA et al. (1983) Fetal imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance: a study in goats. Radiology 149: 193–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredriksson K, Lindvall O, Ingemarsson I, Astedt B, Cronqvist S, Holtas S (1989) Repeated cranial computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans in two cases of eclampsia. Stroke 20: 547–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garden AS, Weindling M, Griffith RD, Martin P A (1991) Assessment of fetal well-being with magnetic resonance J Perinat Med 19: 435–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillies RJ et al. (1985) High resolution proton NMR spectroscopy of human amniotic fluid. Abstracts of Society of Magnetic Resonance. In: Medicine fourth annual meeting, London, (August) pp 789–790

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ha HK, Jung JK, Kang SJ, Nam Koong SEN, Kim SJ, Kim JY, Shirin KS (1993) MR imaging in the diagnosis of rare forms of ectopic pregnancy AJR 160: 1229–1232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henning J, Naureth A, Friedburg H (1986) Rare imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 3: 823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG, Arger PH, Mintz MC, Arenson RL, Toaff ME (1987) Leiomyomas in pregnancy: sonographic study Radiology 164: 375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MahoneyBJ (1985) Sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy J Ultrasound Med 4: 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy SM (1985) Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy Radiology 154:427–432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Stark DD, Callen PW, Golbus MS, Mricak H (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal anomalies in utero: Early experience AJR 145: 677–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy SM, Stark DD, Filly RA, Callen PW, Hricak H, Higgins CB (1985) Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: maternal anatomy Radiology 154: 421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirich DR, Hall JT, Kraft WL, Santamaria M, Charnsangavej C (1988) Metastatic Adnexal Trophoblastic Neoplasm: Contribution of MR Imaging J Comp Ass Tomo 12: 1061–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Radiological Protection Board (1983) Revised guidelines on acceptable limits of exposure during nuclear magnetic clinical imaging. Br J Radiol 56: 974–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nghiem HV, Herfkens RJ, Francis JR, Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB, LiKCP, Steiner RM, Glover GH (1992) The pelvis: T2-weighted Fast-Spin-Echo MR imaging. Radiology 185: 213–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peer D, Kusstatscher M, Delucca A, Psenneer K (1991) Transitorische Osteoporose in der Schwan gerschaft: Diagnose mittels MRI. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 51: 659–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Possmayer F (1982) The prenatal lung. In: Jones C (ed) The biochemical development of the fetus and neonate. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 287–328

    Google Scholar 

  21. Powell MC, Worthington BS (April 1986) MRI: a new milestone in modern OB care. Diagn Imaging: 86–91

    Google Scholar 

  22. Powell MC, Buckley J, Price H, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154(3): 565–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Raps EC, Galetta SL, Broderick M, Atlas SW (1993) Delayed peripartum vasculopathy: cerebral eclampsia revisited. Ann Neurol 33: 222–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sigmund G, Bauer M, Henne K, De Gregorio G, Wenz W (1991) Technik der kernspintomographischen Beckenmessung in der Geburtshilfe. Fortschr Röntgenstr 154 4: 370–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith FW, Kent C., Abramovich DR, Sutherland HW (1985) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: a new look at the fetus. Br J Obstet Gynecol 92: 1024–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith FW, Sutherland HW (1986): Short Tl inversion recovery (STIR) imaging in human pregnancy, Magn Reson Imaging 4: 137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith FW (1985) The potential use of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy. J Perinat Med 13: 265–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Callen PW, Hricak H, Parer JT (1985) Intrauterine growth retardation: evaluation by magnetic resonance: work in progress. Radiology 155: 425–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stehling MK, Houseman AM, Ordidge RJ, et al. (1989) Whole-body echo-planar UR imaging at 0,5 tesla. Radiology 170: 257–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thickman D, Mirtz M, Mennubi M, Kressel HJ (1984) MR imaging of cerebral abnormalities in utero. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(6): 1058–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thorp JM, Councell RB, Sandridge DA, Wiest HH (1992) Antepartum diagnosis of placenta previa percreta by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 80: 506–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1988) Magnetic resonance diagnostic device: panel recommen dation and report on petitions for MR reclassification. Fed Reg 53: 7575

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vandenplas O, Dive A, Dooms G, Mahien P (1990) Magnetic resonance evaluation of severe neurological disorders in eclampsia. Neuroradiology 32: 47–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Villforth JC (1985) Medical radiation protection: a long view. AJR 145: 1114–1118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weinreb JC, Lowe TW, Cohen JM, Kutler M (1985) Human fetal anatomy: MR imaging. Radiology 157: 715–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Weinreb JC, Lowe TW, Santos-Ramos R, Cunningham FG, Parkey R (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric diagnosis. Radiology 154: 157–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weinreb JC, Brown CE, Lowe TW, Cohen JM, Erdman WA (1986) Pelvic masses in pregnant patients: MR and US imaging. Radiology 159: 717–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Williamson RA, Weiner CP, Yuh WTC, Abu-Yousef MM (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging of anomalous fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 73: 952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wischni KA, Nalepa E, Lehmann KJ, Wentz KU, Georgi M, Melchert F (1993) Zur Prävention des menschlichen Geburtstraumas. Die computergestützte Simulation des Geburtsvorganges mit Hilfe der Kernspintomographie und der Finiten-Element-Analyse. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 53: 35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yiu-Chui Y,ChiuL( 1982) Sonographic features ofplacental complications of pregnancy. AJR 138: 879

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yuen BH (1977) Plasma beta-subunit human chorionic gonadotropin assay in molar pregnancy and choriocarcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 127: 711–712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reinbold, WD. (1995). Kernspintomographie in der Schwangerschaft. In: Hillemanns, H.G. (eds) Geburtshilfe — Geburtsmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48048-5_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48048-5_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-48049-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48048-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics