Advertisement

Literatur

  • Bernd Klauer
Chapter
  • 82 Downloads
Part of the Umwelt und Ökonomie book series (UMWELT, volume 25)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahlheim, M. (1995): Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse und kontingente Evaluierung bei der Bewertung von Umweltprojekten. Aktuelle Reihe der Fakultät Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik 4/95, Brandenburgische Technische Universität, Cottbus.Google Scholar
  2. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Arbeitsgruppe Umweltstandards) (1992): Umweltstandards: Grundlagen, Tatsachen und Bewertungen am Beispiel des Strahlenrisikos. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Amir, S. (1975): Equilibrium in Ecological Systems. Dissertation. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  4. Amir, S. (1987): Energy Pricing, Biomass Accumulation, and Project Appraisal: A Thermodynamic Approach to the Economics of Ecosystem Management. In Pillet, G. und Murota, T. (Hrsg.): Environmental Economics: The Analysis of a Major Interface. Roland Leimgruber, Genf: 53–108.Google Scholar
  5. Amir, S. (1989): On the Use of Ecological Prices and System-Wide Indicators Derived Therefrom to Quantify Man’s Impact on the Ecosystem. Ecological Economics, 1: 203–231.Google Scholar
  6. Amir, S. (1994): The Role of Thermodynamics in the Study of Economic and Ecological Systems. Ecological Economics, 10: 125–142.Google Scholar
  7. Amir, S. (1995): Welfare maximization in economic theory: Another viewpoint. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6: 359–376.Google Scholar
  8. Amir, S. (1997): Brief an den Autor vom 29. Mai 1997. Google Scholar
  9. Anderson, R.J. und Crocker, T.D. (1971): Air Pollution and Residential Property Values. Urban Studies, 8: 171–180.Google Scholar
  10. Arrow, K.J. (1963): Social Choice and Individual Values. 2. Aufl., John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Arrow, K.J. und Hahn, F.H. (1971): General Competitive Analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco; Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  12. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. und Schuman, H. (1993): Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Vervielfältigtes Manuskript, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Aubreville, A. (1938): La forêt coloniale: les forêts de l’Afrique occidentale française. Ann. Ac. Sci. colon. (Paris), 9: 1–245.Google Scholar
  14. Barney, G.O. (Hrsg.) (1980): The Global 2000 Report to the President: Entering the Twenty-first Century. Council of Environmental Quality, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Bator, F. (1958): The Anatomy of Market Failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72: 351–379.Google Scholar
  16. Bateman, I. und Willis, K. (Hrsg.) (1995): Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Baumol, W.J. (1968): On the Social Rate of Discount. American Economic Review, 58: 788–802.Google Scholar
  18. Begon, M., Harpner, J.L. und Townsend, C.R. (1991): Ökologie: Individuen, Populationen und Lebensgemeinschaften. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
  19. Bernholz, P. (1994): Die Bedeutung von Böhm-Bawerks Kapital- und Zinstheorie aus historischer Sicht. In Bernholz, P., Blaug, M. und Kurz, H.D.: Eugen von Böhm-Bawerks „Geschichte und Kritik der Kapitalzins-Theorien“:Vademecum zu einem Klassiker der Theoriegeschichte. Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen, Düsseldorf: 129–164.Google Scholar
  20. Bernholz, P. und Breyer, F. (1993): Grundlagen der Politischen Ökonomie. Bd. 1: Theorie der Wirtschaftssysteme. 3. Aufl., Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  21. Bishop, R.C. und Heberlein, T.A. (1979): Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61: 926–930.Google Scholar
  22. Blümel, W., Pethig, R. und Hagen, O.v.d. (1986): The Theory of Public Goods: A Survey of Recent Issues. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 142: 241–309.Google Scholar
  23. Bohnen, A. (1964): Die utilitaristische Ethik als Grundlage der modernen Wohlfahrtsökonomik. Otto Schwarz, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  24. Braden, J.B. und Kolstad, C.K. (Hrsg.) (1991): Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Brennan, T.J. (1995): Discounting the Future: Economics and Ethics. In Resources, Summer 1995, No. 120, Resources for the Future: 3–6.Google Scholar
  26. Brewer, R. (1988): The Science of Ecology. Saunders. Philadelphia et al.Google Scholar
  27. Brink, B. ten(1991): The Amoeba approach as a useful tool for establishing sustainable development. In Kuik/Verbruggen (1991): 71–87.Google Scholar
  28. Brookshire, D.S., Eubanks, L.S. und Randall, A. (1983): Estimating Option Prices and Existence Values for Wildlife Resources. Land Economics, 59: 1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Brown, G.M. und Johnson, R.W. (1982): Pollution Control by Effluent Charges: It Works in the Federal Republic of Germany, Why not in the U.S.? Natural Resources Journal, 22: 929–966.Google Scholar
  30. Bund/Misereor (Hrsg.) (1995): Zukunftsfähiges Deutschland: Ein Beitrag zu einer global nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Birkhäuser, Basel, Berlin.Google Scholar
  31. Bundesumweltministerium (Hrsg.) (o.J.): Konferenz der Vereinten Nationen für Umwelt und Entwicklung im Juni 1992 in Rio de JaneiroDokumente: Agenda 21. (Deutsche Übersetzung der Agenda 21.) Bonn.Google Scholar
  32. Cansier, D. (1996): Umweltökonomie. 2. Aufl., Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  33. Carson, R.T. (1991): Constructed Markets. In Braden/Kolstad (1991): 121–162.Google Scholar
  34. Chichilnisky, G. (1977a): Development patterns and the international order. Journal of International Affairs, 31: 275–304.Google Scholar
  35. Chichilnisky, G. (1977b): Economic development and efficiency criteria in the satisfaction of basic needs. Applied Mathematics and Modeling, 1: 290–297.Google Scholar
  36. Chichilnisky, G. (1996): An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social Choice and Welfare, 13: 231–257.Google Scholar
  37. Cicchetti, C.J., Fisher, A. und Smith, V.K. (1976): An Econometric Evaluation of a Generalized Consumer Surplus Measure: The Mineral King Controversy. Economet-rica, 44: 259–1276.Google Scholar
  38. Ciriancy-Wantrup, S. von.(1947): Capital Returns from Soil-Conservation Practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 29: 1181–1196.Google Scholar
  39. Ciriancy-Wantrup, S. von. (1952): Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  40. Clark, W.C. (1986): Sustainable development of the biosphere: themes for a research program. In Clark/Munn (1986): 5–48.Google Scholar
  41. Clark, W.C. und Munn, R.E. (Hrsg.) (1986): Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge et al.Google Scholar
  42. Clarke, E.H. (1971): Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 11: 17–33.Google Scholar
  43. Clawson, M. (1959): Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  44. Clawson, M. und Knetsch, J.L. (1966): Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London.Google Scholar
  45. Clements, F.E. (1916): Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, No. 242. Washington D.C., 16.3.3, 16.4.5.Google Scholar
  46. Coase, R. (1960): The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.Google Scholar
  47. Cobb, C.W. (1991): Der ‘Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare’ oder: Hat die Wohlfahrt in der Gesellschaft wirklich zugenommen? In Diefenbacher/Habricht-Erenler (1991): 61–72.Google Scholar
  48. Common, M. und Perrings, C. (1992): Toward an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 6: 7–34.Google Scholar
  49. Costanza, R. (1989): What is Ecological Economics? Ecological Economics, 1: 1–7.Google Scholar
  50. Costanza, R. (Hrsg.) (1991): Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Costanza, R., Daly, H.E. und Bartholomew, J.A. (1991): Goals, Agenda and Policy Recommendations for Ecological Economics. In Costanza (1991): 1–20.Google Scholar
  52. Costanza, R. und Patten, B.C. (1995): Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15: 193–196.Google Scholar
  53. Cropper, M.L. (1981): The Value of Urban Amenities. Journal of Regional Science, 21: 359–374.Google Scholar
  54. Cummings, R.G., Brookshtre, D.S. und Schulze, W.D. (1986): Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  55. Cummings, R.G. und Harrison, G.W. (1992): Identifying and Measuring Nonuse Values for Natural and Environmental Resources: A Critical Review of the State of the Art. Vervielfältigtes Manuskript.Google Scholar
  56. Dame, R. und Patten, B.C. (1981): Analysis of energy flows in an intertidal oyster reef. Marine EcologyProgress Series, 5: 115–124.Google Scholar
  57. Dantzig, G.B. (1951): Maximization of a Linear Funktion of Variables Subject to Linear Inequalities. In Koopmans (1951a): 339–347.Google Scholar
  58. Daly, H.E. (1977): Steady-State EconomicsThe Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  59. Daly, H.E. (1994): Operationalizing Sustainable Development by Investing in Natural Capital. In Jansson et al. (1994): 22–37.Google Scholar
  60. Daly, H.E. und Cobb, J.B. (with contributions by C.W. Cobb) (1989): For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  61. Dasgupta, P.S. und Heal, G.M. (1979): Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. James Nisbet & Co. and Cambridge University Press, Digswell Place, Welwyn.Google Scholar
  62. Davis, R.K. (1963a): The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation an der Harvard University.Google Scholar
  63. Davis, R.K. (1963b): Recreational Planning as an Economic Problem. Natural Resource Journal 3: 239–249.Google Scholar
  64. Davis R.K. (1964): The Value of Big Game Hunting in a Private Forest. In Transactions of the 29th North American Wildlife and Natural Resouces Conference. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  65. Debreu, G. (1959): Theory of Value. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F.R., Dunford, R.W., Boyle, K.J., Hudson, S.P. und Wilson, K.N. (1993): Damages With Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability. In (1993): 91–164.Google Scholar
  67. Diamond, P.A. und Hausman, J.A. (1993): On Contingent Valuation Measurement of Nonuse Values. In Hausman (1993): 3–38.Google Scholar
  68. Dickie, M., Fisher, A. und Gerking, S.D. (1987): Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparitive Study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82: 69–75.Google Scholar
  69. Diefenbacher, H. (1991): Der ‘Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare’: Eine Fallstudie über die Entwicklung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Diefenba-cher/Habricht-Erenler(1991): 73–88.Google Scholar
  70. Diefenbacher, H. und Habicht-Erenler, S. (Hrsg.) (1991): Wachstum und Wohlstand. Metropolis, Marburg.Google Scholar
  71. Dyckhoff, H. (1992): Betriebliche Produktion: theoretische Grundlagen einer umweltorientierten Produktionswirtschaft. Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  72. Ebert, M.M. (1981): Einführung in die Chemie. Holland & Josenhans Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  73. Edmonds, R.G. (1983): Travel Time Valuation Through Hedonic Regression. Southern Economic Journal, 50: 83–98.Google Scholar
  74. Enquete-KommissionVorsorge zum Schutz der Erdatmosphäre“(1988): Schutz der Erdatmosphäre: eine internationale Herausforderung. Hrsg.: Deutscher Bundestag, Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, Bonn.Google Scholar
  75. Faber, M. (1979): Introduction to Modern Austrian Capital Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  76. Faber, M., Jöst, F. und Manstetten, R. (1995) Limits and perspectives of the concept of sustainable development. Economie Appliquée, 48: 231–249.Google Scholar
  77. Faber, M., Manstetten, R., und Proops, J.L.R. (1992): Humankind and the Environment: An Anatomy of Surprise and Ignorance. Environmental Value, 1: 217–241.Google Scholar
  78. Faber, M. und Proops, J.L.R. (1993a): Evolution, Time, Production and the Environment. 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  79. Faber, M. und Proops, J.L.R. (1993b): Natural Resource Rents, Economic Dynamics and Structural Change: A Capital Theoretic Approach. Ecological Economics, 8: 17–44.Google Scholar
  80. Faber, M., Stephan, G. und Michaelis, P. (1989): Umdenken in der Abfallwirtschaft. 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  81. Falk, G. und Ruppel, W. (1976): Energie und Entropie. Eine Einführung in die Thermodynamik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  82. Fasham, M.J.R. (1985): Flow Analysis of Materials in the Marine Euphotic Zone. In Ulanowicz, R.E. und Platt, T. (Hrsg.): Ecosystem Theory for Biological Oceanography. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 213: 139–175.Google Scholar
  83. Federal Register (1993): Report of the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation. US Government, Washington, D.C., 58(10): 4601–4614.Google Scholar
  84. Fischer, G. (1985): Analytische Geometrie. Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  85. Fisher, I. (1906): The Nature of Capital and Income. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  86. Folke, C., Hammer, M., Costanza, R. und Jansson, A. (1994): Investing in Natural Capital — Why, What, and How? In Jansson et al. (1994): 1–20.Google Scholar
  87. Freeman, A.M. (1979): The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  88. Freeman, A.M. (1993): Nonuse Values in Natural Resources Damage Assessment. In Kopp/Smith(1993).Google Scholar
  89. Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  90. Fudenberg, D. und Tirole, J. (1991): Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), London.Google Scholar
  91. Fuwa, K. (1995): Defining and Measurement of Sustainability: The Biophysical Foundations. In Munasinghe/Shearer (1995): 7, Box 1–1.Google Scholar
  92. Gale, D. (1960): The Theory of Linear Economic Models. McGraw-Hill, New York et al.Google Scholar
  93. Geanakoplos, J. (1987): Stichwort: Overlapping generations models of general equilibrium. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. und Newman, P. (Hrsg.): The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan Press, London: Bd. 3: 767–779.Google Scholar
  94. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971): The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  95. Graßl, H. (1993): Umwelt- und Klimaforschung. In Held, M. und Geißler, K.H. (Hrsg.): Ökologie der Zeit: vom Finden der rechten Zeitmaße. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart: 75–84.Google Scholar
  96. Greenley, D.A., Walsh, R.G. und Young, R.A. (1981): Option Value: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Recreation and Water Quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96: 657–673.Google Scholar
  97. Griliches, Z. (Hrsg.) (1971): Price Indexes and Quality Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  98. Groves, T. (1973): Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41: 617–631.Google Scholar
  99. Haber, W. (1992): Nachhaltige Regionalentwicklung aus der Sicht des Ökologen: Ansätze einer Umorientierung. Politische Ökologie, Sonderheft 4: 13–20.Google Scholar
  100. Haber, W. (1994): Nachhaltige Entwicklung — aus ökologischer Sicht. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung, 7: 9–25.Google Scholar
  101. Hadley, G. (1961): Linear Algebra, Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.).Google Scholar
  102. Haeckel, E. (1866): Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  103. Hampicke, U. (1993): Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der monetären Bewertung der Natur. In Schnabl, H. (Hrsg.): Ökointegrative Gesamtrechnung. De Gruyter, Berlin: 135–155.Google Scholar
  104. Hanemanm, W.M. (1991): Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? American Economic Review, 81: 635–647.Google Scholar
  105. Hanemann, W.M. (1994): Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 19–43.Google Scholar
  106. Hanley, N., Shogren, J.F. und White, B. (1997): Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. Macmillan Press, London.Google Scholar
  107. Hanley, N. und Spash, C. (1993): Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  108. Hannon, B. (1973): The Structure of Ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41: 535–546.Google Scholar
  109. Hannon, B. (1976): Marginal Product Pricing in the Ecosystem. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 56: 253–267.Google Scholar
  110. Hannon, B. (1985): Linear Dynamic Ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 116: 89–110.Google Scholar
  111. Hannon, B. (1995): Input-Output economics and ecology. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6: 331–333.Google Scholar
  112. Hannon, B., Costanza, R. und Heredeen, R.A. (1986): Measures of Energy Cost and Values in Ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13: 391–401.Google Scholar
  113. Harrison, D. und Rubinfeld, D.L. (1978): Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 5: 81–102.Google Scholar
  114. Hartwick, J. (1977): Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 66: 972–974.Google Scholar
  115. Hartwick, J. (1978a): Substitution among exhaustible resources and intergenerational equity. Review of Economic Studies, 45: 347–354.Google Scholar
  116. Hartwick, J. (1978b): Investing returns from depleting renewable resource stocks and intergenerational equity. Economic Letters, 1: 85–88.Google Scholar
  117. Hartwick, J. (1994): Sustainability and Constant Consumption Path in Open Economies with Exhaustible Resources. Universität München, Center for Economic Studies, Working Paper No. 61. München.Google Scholar
  118. Hauff, V. (Hrsg.) (1987): Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft: Der Brundtland-Be rieht der Weltkommissonfür Umwelt und Entwicklung. Eggenkamp-Verlag, Greven.Google Scholar
  119. Hausman, J.A. (1981): Exact Consumer’s Surplus and Deadweight Loss. American Economic Review, 71: 662–676.Google Scholar
  120. Hausman, J.A. (Hrsg.) (1993): Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  121. Hicks, J.R. (1939): The Foundation of Welfare Economics. Economic Journal, 49: 226–247.Google Scholar
  122. Hicks, J.R. (1946): Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economc Theory, 2. Aufl., Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  123. Hinterberger, F., Luks, F. und Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1995): What is „Natural Capital? Wuppertal Papers Nr. 29. Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie, Wuppertal.Google Scholar
  124. Hoehn, J.P. und Randall, A. (1983): Incentives and Performance in Contingent Policy Valuation. Paper presented at the American Agriculture Economics Association summer meeting, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  125. Hofmann, H. (1988): Natur und Naturschutz im Spiegel des Verfassungsrechts. Juristenzeitung, 43: 265–278.Google Scholar
  126. Holling, C.S. (1973): Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1–23.Google Scholar
  127. Holling, C.S. (1986): The Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change. In Clark/Munn (1986): 292–317.Google Scholar
  128. Holling, C.S. (1995): Sustainability: The Crosis-Scale Dimension. In Munasinghe/Shearer (1995): 65–76.Google Scholar
  129. Hölting, B. (1992): Hydrogeologie: Einführung in die Allgemeine und Angewandte Hydrogeologie. 4. Aufl., Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  130. Howarth, R.B. und Norgaard, R.B. (1992): Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development. American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, 82: 473–477.Google Scholar
  131. Howarth, R.B.undNorgaard,R.B. (1995): Intergenerational Choices under Global Environmental Change. In Bromley, D.W. (Hrsg.) The Handbook of Environmental Economics. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, Cambridge, USA: 111–138.Google Scholar
  132. IPCC(Intergovernmental Panal on Climate Change) (1990): The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Hrsg.: Houghton, R., Jenkins, G.J. und Ephraumes, E., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  133. Jansson, A.; Hammer, M.; Folke, C. und Costanza, R. (1994): Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability, Island Press, Washington, D.C., Covelo, CA.Google Scholar
  134. Jarass, H.D. (1987): Der rechtliche Stellenwert technischer und wissenschaftlicher Standards. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 40/1.2: 1225–1231.Google Scholar
  135. Jöst, F. (1994): Klimaänderung, Rohstoffknappheit und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Physika-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  136. Kahneman, D. (1986): Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method. In Cummings/Brookshire/ Schulze (1986).Google Scholar
  137. Kahneman, D. und Knetsch, J.L. (1992): Valuing Public Good: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22: 57–70.Google Scholar
  138. Kaldor, N. (1939): Welf are Propositions in Economics. Economic Journal, 49: 549–552.Google Scholar
  139. Kalwani, M.U.und Silk, A.J.(1982): On the Reliability and Predictive Validity of Purchase Intention Measures. Marketing Science, 1: 243–286.Google Scholar
  140. Keeler, E., Spence, M. und Zeckhauser, R. (1971): The Optimal Control of Pollution. Journal of Economic Theory, 4: 19–34.Google Scholar
  141. Klaasen, G.A.J. und Opschoor, J.B. (1991): Economics of sustainability or the sustain-ability of economics: different paradigms. Ecological Economics, 4: 93–115.Google Scholar
  142. Klauer, B. und Baumgärtner, S. (1996): Operationalization of the Concept of Sustain-able Development on Different Time Scales. Diskussionsschrift der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Heidelberg No. 240, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  143. Knight, F. (1921): Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  144. Koetsier P., Dey, P., Mladenka, G. und Check,J. (1990): Rejecting Equilibrium Theory: A Cautionary Note. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 71(4): 229–230.Google Scholar
  145. Koopmans, T.C. (1951): The Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities. In: Koopmans (1951a): 147–154.Google Scholar
  146. Koopmans, T.C. (Hrsg.) (1951a): Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. John Wiley & Sons. New York et al.Google Scholar
  147. Kopp, R. und Smith, V.K.(Hrsg.) (1993): Valuing Natural Assets. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  148. Krebs, A. (1997): Naturethik im Überblick. In Krebs, A. (Hrsg.): Naturethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt: 337–379.Google Scholar
  149. Krutilla, J.V. (1967): Conservation Reconsidered. American Economic Review, 57: 777–786.Google Scholar
  150. Kuik, O. und Verbruggen, H. (Hrsg.) (1991): In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht et al.Google Scholar
  151. Kupchella, C.E. und Hyland, M.C. (1993): Environmental Science: Living Within the System of Nature. 3. Aufl., Prentice Hall, London.Google Scholar
  152. Laffont, J.-J. und Maskin, E. (1982): The Theory of Incentives: An Overview. In Hildenbrandt, W. (Hrsg.): Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge: 31–94.Google Scholar
  153. Lancaster, K. (1966): A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132–157.Google Scholar
  154. Ledyard, J. (1987): Stichwort: Market Failure. In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. und Newman, P. (Hrsg.): The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan, London: Bd. 3: 326–329.Google Scholar
  155. Leontief, W. (1941): The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  156. Leontief, W. (1970): The dynamic inverse. In Carter, A.P. und Brody, A. (Hrsg.) Contributions to Input-Output Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, London, New York: Bd. 1., Kap. 1.Google Scholar
  157. Liebig, J. von (1840): Die Chemie in ihrer Anwendung auf Agricultur und Physiologic Vieweg, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
  158. Lind, R.C. (1982): A Primer on the Major Issues Relating to the Discount Rate for Evaluating National Energy Options. In Lind (1982a): 21–94.Google Scholar
  159. Lind, R.C. (Hrsg.) (1982a): Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  160. Linder, H. (1983): Biologie. 18. Aufl., Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  161. MacArthur, R.H. und Wilson, E.O. (1967): The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. American Naturalist, 101: 377–385.Google Scholar
  162. Malinvaud, E. (1953): Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica, 21: 233–269.Google Scholar
  163. Malinvaud, E. (1985): Lectures on Microeconomic Theory. Überarbeitete Aufl., North-Holland (Elsevier Science Publishers), Amsterdam et al.Google Scholar
  164. Manstetten, R. (1996): Zukunftsfähigkeit und Zukunftswürdigkeit — Philosophische Bemerkungen zum Konzept der nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Gaia, 5. 291–298.Google Scholar
  165. Marggraf, R. und Streb, S. (1997): Ökonomische Bewertung der natürlichen Umwelt. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  166. Marwell, G. und Ames, R.E. (1981): Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. Part 4. Journal of Public Economics, 15: 295–310.Google Scholar
  167. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Zahn, E. und Milling, P. (1972): Die Grenzen des Wachstums: Bericht des Club of Rome zur Lage der Menschheit. Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  168. Meyer-Abich, K.M. (1984): Wege zum Frieden mit der Natur: Naturphilosophie für die Umweltpolitik. Carl Hanser, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  169. Ministerium für Verkehr und öffentliche Arbeiten (1989): Wasser heute und auch morgen in den Niederlanden: Zusammenfassung des dritten Nationalwasserhaushaltsplans. Den Haag.Google Scholar
  170. Ministerium für Verkehr und öffentliche Arbeiten (1990): Ecological impact assessment on coastal waters. Tidal Water Division. Note GWWS 90.009 Den Haag.Google Scholar
  171. Mishan, E.J. (1969): Survey of Welfare Economics — 1939–1959. In Misham E.J. (Hrsg.): Welfare Economics: Ten Introductory Essays. 2. Aufl., Random House, New York: 11–86.Google Scholar
  172. Mitchell, R.C. und Carson, R.T. (1981): An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay For national Water Quality Improvements. Vervielfältigtes Manuskipt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  173. Mitchell, R.C. und Carson, R.T. (1985): Using Surveys to Value Water Quality Benefits: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  174. Mitchell, R.C. und Carson, R.T. (1989): Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  175. Moore, G.E. (1903): Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  176. Müller, H.J. (1988): Ökologie. VEB Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
  177. Munasinghe, M. und Shearer, W. (Hrsg.) (1995): Defining and Measuring Sustainabil-ity: The Biogeophysical Foundation. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  178. Musgrave, R.A. (1969): Provision for Social Goods. In Margolis, J. und Guitton, H. (Hrsg.): Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and their Relations to the Private Sectors. Macmillan, London: 124–144.Google Scholar
  179. Myerson, R, und Satterthwaite, M. (1983): Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory, 28: 265–281.Google Scholar
  180. Nagel, H.-D. Smiatek, G., und Werner, B. (1994): Das Konzept der kritischen Eintragsraten als Möglichkeit zur Bestimmung von Umweltbelastungs- und -qualitätskriterienCritical Loads & Critical Levels. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  181. Neumann, J. Von (1945): A model of general economic equilibrium. Review in Economic Studies, 13: 1–9.Google Scholar
  182. Neumann, J. Von und Morgenstern, O. (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princton, N.J.Google Scholar
  183. Nickerson, C.A. (1995): Does willingness to pay reflect the purchase of moral satisfaction? A reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28: 126–133.Google Scholar
  184. Norgaard, R.B. und Howarth, R.B. (1991): Sustainability and Discounting the Future. In Costanza (1991): 88–101.Google Scholar
  185. Nutzinger, H.G. (1995): Von der Durchflußwirtschaft zur Nachhaltigkeit — Zur Nutzung endlicher Ressourcen in der Zeit. In Bievert, B. und Held, M. (Hrsg.): Zeit in der ÖkonomikPerspektiven für die Theoriebildung. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt: 207–235.Google Scholar
  186. Odum, E.P. (1969): The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164: 262–270.Google Scholar
  187. Odum, E.P. (1983): Grundlagen der Ökologie. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
  188. Odum, H.T. (1957): Trophic structure and productivity of Silver Springs, Florida. Ecological Monographs, 27: 55–112.Google Scholar
  189. O’Rourke, B. (1974): Travel in Receational Experiance — A Literature Review. Journal of Leisure Economics, 6: 140–156.Google Scholar
  190. Palmquist, R.B. (1991): Hedonic Methods. In Braden/Kohlstad (1991): 77–120.Google Scholar
  191. Patten, B.C., Bosserman, R.W., Finn, J.T.und Cale, W.G. (1976): Propagation of Cause in Ecosystems. In Patten (Hrsg.): Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology. Academic Press, New York: 457–479.Google Scholar
  192. Pearce, D.W. (Hrsg.) (1978): The Valuation of Social Cost. Allan and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  193. Pearce, D.W. und Atkinson, G.D. (1993): Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of „weak“sustainability. Ecological Economics, 8: 103–108.Google Scholar
  194. Pearce, D.W. und Turner, R.K. (1990): Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Harvester Wheatsleaf, New York et al.Google Scholar
  195. Pearce, D.W., Barbier, E. und Markandya, A. (1990): Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. Edward Elgar, Hants (GB), Brookfield (Vt.).Google Scholar
  196. Pelt, M.F.J.van (1993): Ecologically sustainable development and project appraisal in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 7: 19–42.Google Scholar
  197. Petersen, Th. (1996): Individuelle Freiheit und allgemeiner Wille: Buchanans politische Ökonomie und die politische Philosophie. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  198. Pezzey, J. (1992): Sustainable Development Concepts: An Economic Analysis. World Bank Environment Paper No. 2. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  199. Pickett, S.T.A. und White, P.S. (Hrsg.) (1985): The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  200. Pommerehene, W.W. (1987): Präferenzen für öffentliche Güter: Ansätze zu ihrer Erfassung. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  201. Prigogine, I. und Stengers, I. (1984): Order out of Chaos. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  202. Proops, J.L.R., Faber, M., Manstetten, R. und Jöst, F. (1996): Policy Remarks for Achieving a Sustainable World. Ecological Economics, 17: 133–135.Google Scholar
  203. Randall, A.J. (1993): Panal Discussion. In Hausman (1993): 445–463.Google Scholar
  204. Randall, A.J., Ives, B.C. und Eastman, C. (1974): Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics And Management, 1: 132–149.Google Scholar
  205. Randall, A. und Stoll, J.R. (1980): Consumer’s Surplus in Commodity Space. American Economic Review, 70(3): 449–455.Google Scholar
  206. Redclift, M. (1993): Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights. Environmental Values, 2: 3–20.Google Scholar
  207. Redford, K.H. und Robinson, J.G. (1995): Sustainability of Wildlife and Natural Areas. In Munasinghe/Shearer (1995): 401–406.Google Scholar
  208. Reichle, D.E. O’Neill, R.V. und Harris, W.F. (1975): Principles of energy and material exchange in ecosystems. In Dobben, W.H: van und Lowe-McConell, R.H. (Hrsg.) Unifying Concepts in Ecology. W. Jung, Den Haag: 27–43.Google Scholar
  209. Remmert, H. (1990): Naturschutz. 2. Aufl., Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  210. Remmert, H. (1992): Ökologie. 5. Aufl., Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  211. Rennings, K. (1994): Indikatoren für eine dauerhaft-umweltgerechte Entwicklung. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  212. Repetto, R. (1986): World Enough and Time. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.Google Scholar
  213. Römer, A.U. (1991): Der kontingente Bewertungsansatz: eine geeignete Methode zur Bewertung umweltverbessernder Maßnahmen? Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht: 411–456.Google Scholar
  214. Rosen, H.S. (1974): Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 34–55.Google Scholar
  215. Rosen, H.S. (1979): Wage-Based Indexes of Urban Quality of Life. In Mieszkowski, P. und Straszheim, M. (Hrsg.): Current Issues in Urban Economics. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore:74–104.Google Scholar
  216. Sagoff, M. (1992): Has Nature a Good of Its Own? In Costanza, R., Norton, B.G. und Haskell, B.D. (Hrsg.): Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Island Press, Washington, D.C., Colvelo, (Cal.): 57–71.Google Scholar
  217. Samuelson, P.A. (1951): Abstract of a Theorem Concerning Substitutability in Open Leontief Models. In Koopmans (1951a): 142–146.Google Scholar
  218. Samuelson, P.A. (1964): Economics: An Introductory Analysis. 6. Aufl., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  219. Schulze, W.D., Brookshire, D.S., Walther, E.G., MacFarland, K.K., Thayer, M.A. Whitworth, R.L. Ben-David, S.; Malm, W. und Molenar, J. (1983): The Economic Benefits of Preserving Visibility in the National Parklands of the Southwest. Natural Resources Journal 23: 149–173.Google Scholar
  220. Schulze, W.D., Cummings, R.G. und Brookshire, D.S. (1983): Methods Development in Measuring Benefits of Environmental Improvements. Bd. 2, Report an die U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  221. Scitovsky, T. (1941): A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics. Review of Economic Studies, 9: 77–88.Google Scholar
  222. Sen, A.K. (1982): Approaches to the Choice of Discount Rates for Social Benefit-Cost Analysis. In Lind (1982a): 325–353.Google Scholar
  223. Siebert, H. (1983): Ökonomische Theorie natürlicher Ressourcen. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  224. Siebert, H. (1987): Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy. Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  225. Smith, V.K. (1983): The Role of Site and Job Charakterisics in Hedonic Wage Models. Journal of Urban Economics, 13: 296–321.Google Scholar
  226. Smith, V.K. (1992): Kommentar zu Kahneman und Knetsch (1992): Arbitrary Values Good Causes, and Premature Verdicts. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22: 71–89.Google Scholar
  227. Smith, V.K. (1993): Non-Market valuation of environmental policy. Land Economics, 69: 1–26.Google Scholar
  228. Smith, V.K. und Desvousges, W.H. (1986): Measuring Water Quality Benefits. Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar
  229. Smith, V.L. (1979): Incentive Compatible Experimental Processes for the Provision of Public Goods. In Smith, V.L. (Hrsg.) (1979): Research in Experimental Economics. JAI Press, Greenwich (Conn.): 59–168.Google Scholar
  230. Solow, R. (1986): On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88: 141–149.Google Scholar
  231. Solow, R. (1992): An Almost Practical Step Towards Sustainability. An Invited Lecture on the Occasion of the Fortieth Anniversary of Resources of the Future, Oct 8, 1992. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  232. SRU (Rat der Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (1994): Umweltgutachten 1994. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  233. SRU (Rat der Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (1996a): Umweltgutachten 1996. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  234. SRU (Rat der Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (1996b): Ein Mehrstufenmodell zur Festlegung von Umweltstandards — Zur Umsetzung einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Entwicklung —. Zeitschrift für angewandte Umweltforschung, 9: 166–172.Google Scholar
  235. SRU (Rat der Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen) (1996c): Sondergutachten: Konzepte einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Nutzung ländlicher Räume. Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  236. Steel, J.H. (1974): The Structure of Marine Ecosystems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
  237. Stephan, G. und Ahlheim, M. (1996): Ökonomische Ökologie. Springer. Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  238. Stiglitz, J.E. (1982): The Rate of Discount for Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Theory of the Second Best. In Lind (1982a): 151–204.Google Scholar
  239. Stöcker, F.W. und Dietrich, G. (Hrsg.) (1986): Brockhaus ABC Biologie. 6. Aufl., VEB Brockhaus Verlag, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  240. Stockfisch, J.A. (1982): Measuring the Social Rate of Return on Private Investment. In Lind (1982a): 257–271.Google Scholar
  241. Storch, V. und Welsch, U. (1994): Kurzes Lehrbuch der Zoologie. 7. Aufl., Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart et al.Google Scholar
  242. Tideman, T.N. (1977): Introduction. Public Choice, 29 (2) (Special Supplement): 1–13.Google Scholar
  243. Tilly, L.J. (1968): The structure and dynamics of Cone Spring. Ecological Monographs, 38: 169–197.Google Scholar
  244. Tischler, W. (1984): Einführung in die Ökologie. 3. Aufl., Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  245. Tischler, W. (1990): Ökologie der Lebensräume. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  246. Tisdell, CA. (1991): Economics of Environmental Conservation: Economics for Environmental and Ecological Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam et al.Google Scholar
  247. Turner, R.K., Doktor, P. und Adger, N. (1994): Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Wetlands in the U.K.: Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Management. In Jansson et al. (1994): 266–290.Google Scholar
  248. Ulanowicz, R.E. (1986): Growth and Development. Springer, New York et al.Google Scholar
  249. Ulanowicz, R.E. (1991): Contributory Values of Ecosystem Resources. In Costanza (1991): 253–268.Google Scholar
  250. Ulanowicz, R.E. und Kemp, W.M. (1979): Toward Canonical Trophic Aggregations. American Naturalist, 114: 871–881.Google Scholar
  251. Ulph, A.M. und Reynolds, I.K. (1979): An Activity Model of Consumer Behaviour with Special References to Outdoor Recreation. Scottish Journal of Political Economics, 9 : 163–202.Google Scholar
  252. Varian, H.R. (1985): MikroÖkonomie. 2. Aufl., Oldenbourg, München.Google Scholar
  253. Varian, H.R. (1994): MikroÖkonomie. 3. Aufl., Oldenbourg, München.Google Scholar
  254. Vartia, Y.O. (1983): Efficient Methods of Measuring Welfare Change and Compensated Income in Terms of Ordinary Demand Functions. Econometrica, 51: 79–98.Google Scholar
  255. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (1987): Maximale Immissions-Werte zum Schutz des Menschen: Maximale Immissionskonzentration für Ozon (und photochemische Oxidantien). Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Richtlinie 2310, Blatt 15. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  256. Victor, P.A. (1991): Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory. Ecological Economics, 4: 191–213.Google Scholar
  257. Wald, A. (1935a): Über die eindeutige positive Lösbarkeit der neuen Produktionsgleichungen. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 6: 12–20.Google Scholar
  258. Wald, A. (1935b): Über die Produktionsgleichungen der ökonomischen Wertlehre. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 7: 1–6.Google Scholar
  259. Wald, A. (1936): Über einige Gleichungssysteme der mathematischen Ökonomie. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 7: 637–670.Google Scholar
  260. Walker, B.H., Ludwig, D., Holling, C.S. und Peterman, R.M. (1981): Stability of semi-arid savanna grazing systems. Journal of Ecology, 69: 473–498.Google Scholar
  261. Walsh, R., Loomis, J. und Gillman, R. (1984): Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Economics, 60: 14–29.Google Scholar
  262. Walter, W. (1985): Analysis I. Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  263. Weisbrod, B.A. (1964): Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78: 471–477.Google Scholar
  264. White, P.S. und Bratton, S.P. (1980): After preservation: philosophical and practical problems of change. Biological Conservation, 18: 241–255.Google Scholar
  265. Whittaker, R.H. (1975): Communities and Ecosystems. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  266. Wicke, L. (1993): Umweltökonomie: Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. 4. Aufl., Franz Vahlen, München.Google Scholar
  267. Willig, R.D. (1973): Consumer’s Surplus: A Rigorous Cookbook. Technical Report No. 989, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  268. Willig, R.D. (1976): Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology. American Economic Review, 66: 587–597.Google Scholar
  269. Woodward, R.T. und Bishop, R.C. (1995): Efficiency, sustainability and global warming. Ecological Economics 14: 101–111.Google Scholar
  270. Zwilling, R. (1993): Stoffkreisläufe im Leben. In Zwilling, R und Rutsche, W. (Hrsg.) Ökologie und Umwelt. Ein interdisziplinärer Ansatz. Heidelberger Verlagsanstalt, Heidelberg: 19–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Klauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung Ökologische Ökonomie und UmweltsoziologieUFZ - Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbHLeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations