Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 393))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The introductory chapter has shown that price stabilization is often discussed with reference to primary commodity markets, i. e. to the markets of foods and minerals. It is commonplace in the literature to analyze both groups of primary commodities within one model. However, this represents an — in my eyes — unjustifiably high degree of aggregation. For note first that protected domestic markets do mainly prevail in the range of foodstuffs (and not so much among minerals). Further, agricultural production is typically subject to strong stochastic influences such as wheather conditions and pests, whereas this is not the case in, say, the mining of metals. On the other hand, demand for minerals is probably considerably more sensitive to macroeconomic shocks than is the demand for basic foodstuffs11. I will therefore deviate from the tradition of covering both types of primary commodities by one model and henceforth confine my attention solely to agricultural products12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. In fact, this is just the basic structure of the EEC’s sugar market policy. The actual sugar market scheme is much more complicated, cf. Manegold & Sommer (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The only exceptions were the International Olive Oil Agreements, targeted at reducing supply fluctuations. See Gordon—Ashworth (1984) for details.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A similar result is reported by Massell (1969), who finds a producer’s gain from stabilization to be the greater, the larger the covariance between his individual and the whole industry’s supply curve is.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucke, B. (1992). On the Desirability of Price Stabilization. In: Price Stabilization on World Agricultural Markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46782-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46782-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56099-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46782-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics