Skip to main content

Some Common Problems in the Use of Classification Procedures in Social Sciences

  • Conference paper
Book cover Analyzing and Modeling Data and Knowledge
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

This paper deals with some common problems in connection with classification procedures in social research. First, an abstract model is shown on which most surveys are based. A number of classification tasks can be deduced from this model. However, classification procedures are rarely applied. The reason for this is discussed in the second part of the paper. The paradigma of structural equation models shows why some well known problems of numerical classification are evaluated negatively and hence classification procedures are rarely used. However, it is too easy to explain the rare use of classification by this paradigma only. Another important reason is the negligence of measurement errors. The standard statistical packages, like BMDP, SAS and SPSS-X, do not contain classification procedures that allow an estimation of measurement errors. The third part shows that latent class analysis and multivariate mixture models can be interpreted as classification procedures which make allowance for measurement errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BACHER, J. (1989), Einführung in die Clusteranalyse mit SPSS-X für Historiker und Sozialwissenschafter. Historcial Social Research Vol. 14, 6–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • BACHER, J. (1990), Einführung in die Logik der Skalierungsverfahren. Historical Social Research Vol. 15, 4–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARDELEBEN, H. (1987), CONCLUS. Gießen.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENTLER, P.M. (1983), Theory and Implentation of EQS, a Structural Equation Program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALINSKI, T., and HARABASZ, J. (1974), A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis. Communications in Statistics, 13, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENZ, H. (1989), Einführung in die empirische Sozialforschung. Wien-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, W.J. (1983), BMDP Statistical Software. 1983 Printing with Additions. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUDA, R.O., and HART, P.E. (1973), Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLM, K. (1976), Die Faktorenanalyse, in: K. HOLM (Ed.), Die Befragung 3. München, 11–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • INGLEHART, R. (1979), Wertewandel in den westlichen Gesellschaften, in: H. KLAGES and P. KMIECIAK (Eds.), Wertewandel und gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Frankfurt a.M.-New York, 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • JORESKOG, K.D., and SORBOM, D. (1984), LISREL VI. Analysis of Linear Structural Relationship by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAUFMANN, H., and PAPE, H. (1984), Clusteranalyse, in: L. FAHRMEIR and A. HAMMERLE (Eds.), Multivariate statistische Analyseverfahren. Berlin-New York, 371–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUHN, T. (1968), Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt a.M. LAZARSFELD, P.F., and HENRY, N.W. (1968), Latent Structure Analysis. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LORD, F.M., and NOVICK, M.R. (1968), Statistical Test Theory of Mental Test Scores. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOJENA, A. (1977), Hierachical Grouping Methods and Stopping Rules-An Evaluation. Computer Journal Vol. 20, 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • PFEIFER, A., and SCHMIDT, P. (1987), LISREL. Die Analyse komplexer Strukturgleichungsmodelle. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS INSTITUTE INC. (1988), SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Cary NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHLOSSER, O. (1976), Einführung in die sozialwissenschaftliche Zusammenhangsanalyse. Reinbek bei Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS INC. (1986), SPSS-X User’s Guide. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS INC. (1985), SPSS Statistical Algorithms. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEINHAUSEN, D., and LANGER, K. (1977), Clusteranalyse. Einführung in die Methoden und Verfahren der automatischen Klassifikation. Berlin-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WISHART, D. (1984), CLUSTAN. Benutzerhandbuch. 3. Ausgabe. Stuttgart-New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bacher, J. (1992). Some Common Problems in the Use of Classification Procedures in Social Sciences. In: Schader, M. (eds) Analyzing and Modeling Data and Knowledge. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46757-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46757-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46757-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics