Skip to main content

Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Formen der augmentierten Spontanatmung

  • Conference paper
Beatmungsformen

Zusammenfassung

Mit den verschiedenen Möglichkeiten der maschinellen Unterstützung der Spontanatmung - auch augmentierte Spontanatmung genannt - haben sich Veränderungen in der Nomenklatur und Systematik der Beatmungstechniken ergeben. Danach kann grundsatzlich zwischen partieller oder totaler Unterstiitzung der Atmung unterschieden werden. Die partielle Unterstiitzung („partial ventilatory support“, PVS) umfaßt alle Methoden, die in Verbindung mit Spontanatmung verwendet werden, die völlige oder totale Unterstützung der Atmung („total ventilatory support“, TVS) hingegen beinhaltet alle Formen kontrollierter Beatmung.

Vortrag Zentraleuroäischer Anästhesiekongreß, Innsbruck 1989.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F (1987) Optimum level of pressure support in patients with unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Resp Dis [Abstract] A51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F (1987) Pressure support decreases work of breathing and oxygen consumption during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 135:A51

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brochard L, Pluskwa F, Lemaire F (1987) Improved efficacy of spontaneous breathing with inspiratory pressure support. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brochard L, Lemaire F (1988) Inspiratory pressure support. Update in intensive care and emergency medicine, vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 767–771

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F (1988) Prevention of diaphragmatic fatigue with inspiratory pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. International Symposium: Inspiratory muscle function during partial ventilatory support, Abstract. Evangelische Akademie, Tutzing

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher KL, Neff TA et al. (1985) Demand and continuous flow intermittent mandatory ventilation systems. Chest 87:625–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox D, Tinloi SF, Farrimond JG (1988) Investigation of the spontaneous modes of breathing of different ventilators. Intensive Care Med 14:532–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Downs JB, Klein EF et al. (1973) Intermittent mandatory ventilation: a new approach to weaning patients from mechanical ventilators. Chest 64:331–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Falke KJ (1988) Intermittent mandatory ventilation: Revisited. Update in intensive care and emergency medicine, vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 759–766

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gherini S, Peters R, Virgilio R (1979) Mechanical work on the lungs and work of breathing with positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure. Chest 76:251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kacmarek RM (1988) The role of pressure support ventilation in reducing work of breathing. Respir Care 33:99–120

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kacmarek RM, Torres A, Kimball WR, Qvist J, Stanek K, Whythe RI, Zapol WM (1988) Diaphragmatic function during pressure support ventilation and CPAP in adult sheep. International symposium: Inspiratory muscle function during partial ventilatory support, Abstract. Evangelische Akademie, Tutzing

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kanak R, Fahey P, Vanderwarf C (1985) Oxygen cost of breathing: changes dependent upon mode of mechanical ventilation. Chest 87:126–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemaire F, Teboul JL et al. (1988) Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiol 69:171–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maclntyre NR (1986) Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation. Chest 89:677–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Samodelov LF, Falke K (1988) Total inspiratory work with modern demand walve devices compared to continous flow CPAP. Intensive Care Med 14:632–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlobohm RM, Falltrick RT et al. (1981) Lung volumes, mechanics, and oxygenation during spontaneous positive pressure ventilation: the advantage of CPAP over EPAP. Anesthesiology 55:416–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinhoff H, Falke K, Schwarzhoff W (1982) Enhanced renal function associated with intermittend mandatory ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 8: 69–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinhoff H, Kohlhoff RJ, Falke K (1984) Facilitation of excretory function and hemodynamics of the kidneys by intermittent mandatory ventilation. Intensive Care Med 10:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Viale JP, Annat GJ et al. (1988) Pressure support ventilation vs continous positive pressure. Chest 93:506–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Viale H, Annat G, Bouffard Y, Delafasse B, Opazo S, Motin J (1988) Oxygen cost of breathing during inspiratory pressure support ventilation. International Symposium: Inspiratory muscle function during partial ventilatory support, Abstract. Evangelische Akademie, Tutzing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weisman IM, Rinaldo JE, Rogers RM, Saunders MH (1983) State of the art: intermittent mandatory ventilation. Am Rev Resp Dis 127:641–647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Falke, K.J. (1991). Vor- und Nachteile verschiedener Formen der augmentierten Spontanatmung. In: Suter, P.M., Baum, M., Luger, T.J. (eds) Beatmungsformen. Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46738-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46738-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53840-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46738-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics