Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Contact Allergy

  • Conference paper
New Trends in Allergy III
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

Contact dermatitis is not a rare disease, it represents 2%–6% of all skin diseases. Localization, sex, age, and occupation may vary greatly according to the source population studied. A prospective study in Heidelberg, West Germany, in which 1155 patients were examined during a 2 year period (1986–1988) provided these results: (1) women outnumber men by 2:1; (2) the hands and face are primarily affected in young women, in older patients the legs are another important localization; (3) occupational contact dermatitis was found in 10% of patients; (4) high risk professions were hairdressers, nurses, metalworkers, cleaning personnel, and housewives; (5) major allergens were nickel, fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, octhilinone neomycin, formaldehyde, potassium dichromate, and various medications (heparin ointments, bufexamac).

Exact data on the prevalence and incidence of contact dermatitis are still rare. Observational studies have to improve in quality with regard to definition of source population, proof of diagnosis, and exposure period to allergens and irritants. Data on the prevalence of contact dermatitis in the general and working populations are still poorly documented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrup G (1969) Hand eczema. Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl 61] (Stockh) 49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Butz M, Drexel G, Emmerich N, Plinske W, Schönberger A, Wohlberedt F (1985) Das Berufskrankheitengeschehen. Eine exemplarische Darstellung ausgewählter Berufskrankheiten. Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften, Bonn, pp 1–117

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coenraads PJ, Nater JP, van der Lende R (1983) Prevalence of eczema and other dermatoses of the hands and arms in the Netherlands. Clin Exp Dermatol 8:495–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ducombs G, Benezra C, Talaga P, Andersen KE, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, Dooms-Goossens A, Frosch PJ, Lachapelle JM, Menné T, Rycroft RJG, White IR, Wilkinson JD (1990) Patch testing with the “sesquiterpene lactone mix”: a marker for contact allergy to Compositae and other ses-quiterpene-lactone-containing plants. Contact Dermatitis 22:249–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fabry H (1981) Statistik der Berufskrankheiten der Hautgefährdungskataster. Dermatosen 29:42–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frosch PJ, Raulin C (1987) Kontaktallergie auf Bufexamac. Hautarzt 38:331–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frosch JP, Schulze Dirks A (1987) Kontaktallergie auf Kathon CG. Hautarzt 38:422–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frosch PJ, Weickel R, Schmitt T, Krastel H (1988) Nebenwirkungen von ophthalmologischen Externa. Z Hautkr 63:126–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frosch PJ, Kleinhans D, Fuchs T (1989) Formaldehyde and glyceryl monothioglycolate: results of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Frosch PJ, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) In: Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 274–280

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson MLT Roberts J (1978) Skin conditions and related need for medical care for persons 1–74 years, United States 1971 – 1974. Vital and Health statistics. US Department of health, Education and Welfare, Washington (National Health Survey, ser 11, no 212)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson MLT, Burdick AE, Johnson KG, Klarman HE, Krasmer M, McDowell AJ, Roberts J (1979) Prevalence, morbidity and cost of dermatological diseases. J Invest Dermatol 73:395–401

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kavli G, Förde OH (1984) Hand dermatoses in Tromsö. Contact Dermatitis 10:174–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LMR (1987) National Medical Registration. LMR Yearbook 1987. SIG, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mathias CGT, Morrison JH (1988) Occupational skin diseases, United States results from Bureau of Labor Statistics annual survey of occupational injuries and illnesses, 1973 through 1984. Arch Dermatol 124:1519–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meding BE, Swanbeck G (1987) Prevalence of hand eczema in an industrial city. Br J Dermatol 116:627–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menné T, Borgan Ö, Green A (1982) Nickel allergy and hand dermatitis in a stratified sample of the Danish female population, an epidemiological study including a statistic appendix. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 62:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rea JN, Newhouse ML, Halil T (1976) Skin diseases in Lambeth. A community study of prevalence and use of medical care. Br J Prev Soc Med 30:107–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schauder S, Ippen H (1988) Photoallergisches and allergisches Kontaktekzem durch Diben-zoylmethan-Verbindungen und andere Lichtschutzmittel. Hautarzt 39:435–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weismann K, Krakauer R, Wanscher B (1980) Prevalence of skin diseases in old age: Acta Derm Vernereol (Stockh) 60:352–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilkinson DS, Wilkinson JD (1979) Comparison of patch test result in two adjacent areas of England. I. Industrial allergens. Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl 85] (Stockh) 59:189–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmermann J (1990) Epidemiologie von Kontaktallergien. Thesis, University of Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Frosch, P.J., Zimmermann, J. (1991). Epidemiology of Contact Allergy. In: Ring, J., Przybilla, B. (eds) New Trends in Allergy III. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46717-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46717-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-46719-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46717-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics