Abstract
When it comes to decision-making processes in general, and more particularly in the realm of public decisions, the multifariousness of objectives usually reflects the wide range of interests of the actors involved, and, as a result, the decision-maker’s role often boils down to that of an arbitrator whose purpose is reaching a balanced outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BENITO-ALONSO, M.A. and DEVAUX, P. [1981], “Location and Size of Day Nurseries. A multiple Goal Approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, 6, 195–198.
BROCK, H.K. [1980], “The Problem of ‘Utility Weights’ in Group Preference Aggregation”, Operations Research, 28, 176–187.
CETUR [1976], “Système DAVIS, programme d’affectation de trafic sur voirie”, Ministère de l’Equipement, Paris.
DEVAUX, P. [1981], “L’évaluation des besoins et la planification des services de garde pour enfants en bas âge”, Thèse d’Etat, Université Paris IX Dauphine, Paris.
HANSEN, P., PEETERS, D. AND THISSE, J.F. [1983], “Public Facility Location Models: a Selective Survey” in Thisse, J.F. and Zoller, H.G. (eds), Location Analysis of Public Facilities, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
HARNO IMAI [1983], “Individual Monotonicity and Lexicographic Maximin Solution”, Econometrica, 51, 389–401.
HUCKERT, K., RHODE, R., ROGLIN, G. AND WEBER, R. [1980], “On the Interactive Solution to a Multicriteria Scheduling Problem”, Zeitschrift für Operations Research, 24, 47–60.
KALAI, E. AND SMORODINSKI, M. [1975], “Other Solutions to the Nash’s Bargining Problem”, Econometrica, 43, 513–518.
KEENEY, R.L. AND RAIFFA, H. [1976], “Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Off”, Wiley, New York.
MUSGRAVE, R.A. [1959], “Theory of Public Finances”, McGraw Hill, New York.
NASH, J.F. [1950], “The Bargaining Problem”, Econometrica, 18, 155–162.
PRESSACCO, F. [1980], “Fairness and Stability: a two Criteria Arbitration Schem for Homogeneous Weightea Majority Games”, C.E.R.O., 22, n°1, 91–100.
RAIFFA, H. [1953], “Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two-Person Games”, in Contributions to the Theory of Games II, H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, eds, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 361–387.
RAIFFA, H. [1982], “The Art and Science of Negotiation”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
ROSENTHAL, R.W., “An Arbitration Model for Normal Form Games”, Mathematics of Operations Research, 1, 82–88.
RAWLS, J. [1971], “A Theory of Justice”, The Bellknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
SEN, A.K. [1973], “On Economic Inequality”, Claredon Press, Oxford, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benito-Alonso, M.A., Condis, F., Van Audenrode, M. (1987). Arbitration Models for Solving Multiobjective Optimization. In: Sawaragi, Y., Inoue, K., Nakayama, H. (eds) Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 285. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46607-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46607-6_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17718-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46607-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive