Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 209))

Abstract

There are three principles which one can recognize in problem solving. They are the principles of decomposition, comparative judgments and synthesis of priorities. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) provides a comprehensive framework to cope with the intuitive, the rational, and the irrational in us all at the same time when we make decisions. It is a method we can use to integrate our perceptions and purposes into an overall synthesis. The AHP does not require that judgments be consistent or even transitive. The degree of consistency (or inconsistency) of the judgments is revealed at the end of the AHP process. The 48 page paper given at the meeting has been reduced to bare essentials to fit in the pages allotted here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Lebesgue, Henri, “Measure Theory,” in Measure and the Integral, Holden-Day, 1966; in French Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Thomas L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Thomas L., Decision Making in Complex Environments, Wadsworth, Inc., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Thomas L. and Luis G. Vargas, The Logic of Priorities, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, Thomas L., “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saaty, T.L. (1983). Priority Setting in Complex Problems. In: Hansen, P. (eds) Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46473-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46473-7_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11991-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46473-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics