Advertisement

Integrated MCDA: A Simulation Case Study

  • Valerie BeltonEmail author
  • Mark Elder
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 465)

Abstract

Despite the fact that the origins of the MCDM school lie in extensions of linear programming to problems with multiple objectives, multicriteria analysis, in particular methods for choosing between discrete alternatives, tend to be viewed by Operational Research/Management Science (OR/MS) practitioners as distinct from other methods of OR/MS. In this paper we argue that MCDA should be viewed as an integral part of all problem solving methodologies, not as a set of tools applicable only to certain categories of problem. We will illustrate our argument by reference to a problem faced by the management of a regional UK airport, namely the allocation of check-in desks to airlines. In this case study simulation and multicriteria analysis have been integrated, using the softwares Simul8 and V.I.S.A, to provide a decision support tool for the airport Planning Manager. The DSS will be used in the short term to allocate check-in time slots in a way which achieves effective management of queues and utilization of the desks; in the longer term it will inform the allocation of take-off times.

Keywords

Simulation Multi-attribute value theory Integrating methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BELTON, V., ACKERMANN, F. and SHEPHERD, I. (1997) “Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and V.I.S.A” Journal of Multiple Criteria Analysis Google Scholar
  2. BELTON, V. and ELDER, M.D. (1994). “Decision Support Systems - Learning from Visual Interactive Modelling”, Decision Support Systems (12), 355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BELTON, V. and ELDER, M.D. (1996) “Exploring a Multicriteria Approach to Production Scheduling”, Journal of the Operational Research Society (47), 162–174Google Scholar
  4. BELTON, V. and PICTET, J. (1997) Opinion Makers Section, Newsletter of the European Wirkin Group on “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions”, Series 2, Number 11Google Scholar
  5. BELTON, V. and VICKERS, S.P. (1993) “Demystifying DEA: A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multicriteria Analysis”, Journal of the Operational Research Society (44), 883–896Google Scholar
  6. GRAVEL, M., MARTEL, J.M., NADEAU, R., PRICE, W. and TREMBLAY, R. (1991) “A Multicriterion View of Optimal Resource Allocation in Job-Shop Production” presented to IFORS SPC1 on Decision Support Systems, Bruges.Google Scholar
  7. KORHONEN, P. (1997), Opinion Makers Section, Newsletter of the European Wirkin Group on “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions”, Series 2, Number 10Google Scholar
  8. MACHARIS, C. (1997) “Hybrid Mmodelling: System Dynamics Combined with Multicriteria Analysis”, Vrije Universitet Brussels, Centre for Statistics and Operational Research, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  9. SPENGLER, T. and PENKUHN, T. (1996) “KOSIMEUS - A Combination of a Flowsheeting Program and a Multicriteria Decision Support System” accepted for publication in the Proceedings of SAMBA II Workshop (State of the Art Computer Programs for Material Balancing), Wuppertal InstitutGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management ScienceUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations