Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 152))

  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

Despite several decades of clinical research, a variety of questions about how to administer optimal adjuvant chemotherapy remain. One lingering question is the importance of dose as a determinant of outcome in both early and advanced stage breast cancer. The possibility that the dose of chemotherapy actually received by the patient might influence clinical outcome was first raised by Bonadonna and colleagues in their retrospective analysis of the seminal trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy versus observation for treatment of women with node-positive breast cancer. The concepts of dose intensity, dose density, total dose, dose size, etc., have gradually evolved from this initial work. Technological developments such as the advent of colony-stimulating factors and the ability to harvest autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood progenitor cells have permitted substantial dose escalation of cytotoxics like the alkylating agents whose primary toxicity is myelosuppression. In addition, the administration of cytotoxics more frequently or at high doses repetitively has become feasible. However, few trials that explicitly test the value of these approaches have been reported as yet. In addition, those trials reported have not been uniformly positive. For example, two sequential trials of dose escalation of cyclophosphamide with a fixed dose of doxorubicin for women with node-positive breast cancer have thus far failed to show a major advantage of a fourfold escalation in cyclophosphamide dose from 600 mg/m2 to 2400 mg/m2 per cycle. Early follow-up of a trial of dose escalation of doxorubicin from 60 mg/m2 to 90 mg/m2 per cycle with a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide in the same group of women also shows no benefit. Thus, though supported by preclinical models, regimens with greatly increased dose, dose intensity, or dose density cannot be regarded as standard at present in the absence of clear proof of superiority. However, the area remains an active area of clinical investigation, as exemplified by two presentations during the session on cytotoxics and their dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Davidson, N.E., Valagussa, P. (1998). Summary. In: Senn, HJ., Gelber, R.D., Goldhirsch, A., Thürlimann, B. (eds) Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer VI. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 152. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45769-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45769-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45771-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45769-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics