Skip to main content

Noncooperative Capacities of Simple Games

  • Conference paper
  • 58 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 353))

Abstract

Simple games are a most succinct description of the power structure induced by the decision procedures, focusing on winning — i.e. all-powerful — coalitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Barbera’, B. Dutta (1982): “Implement ability via Protective Equilibria,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 10, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Barbera’, B. Dutta (1986): “General, Direct and Self-implementation of Social Choice Functions via Protective Equilibria,” Mathematical Social Sciences 11, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Barbera’, M. Jackson (1988): “Maximin, Leximin, and Protective Criterion: Characterizations and Comparisons,” Journal of Economic Theory 46, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. S. Bernheim (1986): “Axiomatic Characterizations of Rational Choice in Strategic Environments,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Brandeburger, E. Dekel (1986): “On an Axiomatic Approach to Refinements of Nash Equilibrium,” University of Cambridge Economic Theory Discussion Paper no. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Dasgupta, P. Hammond, E. Maskin (1979): “The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility,” Review of Economic Studies 46, 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. D’Aspremont, B. Peleg (1988): “Ordinal Bayesian Incentive Compatible Representations of Committees,” Social Choice and Welfare 5, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Dutta (1980): “Strategic Voting in a Probabilistic Framework,” Econometrica 48, 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Dutta (1984): “Effectivity Functions and Acceptable Game Forms,” Econometrica 52, 1151–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. A. Ferejohn, D. M. Grether, R. D. McKelvey (1982): “Implementation of Democratic Social Choice Functions,” Review of Economic Studies 49, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Holzman (1986): “The Capacity of a Committee,” Mathematical Social Sciences 12, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler (1978): “Construction of Oucome Functions Guaranteeing Existence and Pareto Optimality of Nash Equilibria,” Econometrica 46, 1447–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Kalai, D. Samet (1984): “Persistent Equilibria in Strategic Games,” Internetional Journal of Game Theory 13, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Kalai, D. Samat (1985): “Unanimity Games and Pareto Optimality,” International Journal of Game Theory 14, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Kohlberg, J. F. Mertens (1986): “On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria,” Econometrica 54, 1003–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Maskin (1977): “Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality,” Mimeo, M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. D. McKelvey: “Game forms for Nash Implementation of General Social Choice Correspondences,” Social Choice and Welfare 6, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Moore, R. Repullo (1988): “Subgame Perfect Implementation,” Econometrica 56, 1191–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Moulin (1983): The Strategy of Social Choice,” North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Nakamura (1979): “The vetoers in a Simple Game with Ordinal Preferences,” International Journal of Game Theory 8, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. Palfrey, S. Srivastava (1986): “Nash Implementation Using Undominated Strategies,” Mimeo, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Peleg (1984): “Game Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees,” C.V.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Peleg (1987): “Cores and Capacities of Compound Simple Games,” Social Choice and Welfare 4, 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Van Damme (1987): “Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria,” Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vannucci, S. (1991). Noncooperative Capacities of Simple Games. In: Ricci, G. (eds) Decision Processes in Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 353. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45686-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45686-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53592-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45686-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics