Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 233))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the production patterns of the red metal. First, a few non-technical remarks about the art of copper processing present the metallurgical background necessary to understand the detailed statistical description of the development of the various stages of copper production following in the later sections. Like all chapters in the first part of this book, chapter 2 provides the illustrative basis for the development of the econometric model in the second part of the book. But, moreover, it also intends to stress factors which have not been accounted for by the econometric model, and thus to remind the reader of its limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The standard reference about the extractive metallurgy of copper is Biswas, Davenport (1976). Very easily readable, but not up-to-date, are the short summaries of mining, smelting and refining by Milliken (1966) and Prior (1966). The following survey is compiled from all the sources mentioned.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The influence of smelting on the environment has been one of the main concerns of the copper industry and environmentalists recently. It is, of course, not a new problem. Already more than one hundred years ago, Merbach (1881) reported about severe air pollution arising from copper smelting in the Kingdom of Saxony.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The percentages refer to the United States in 1981. See Minerals Yearbook (1981: 289).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas and Davenport (1976: 217-241) explain single-step and multi-step processes to produce blister copper.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loc. cit.: 345-346.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations (1981) for an analysis of the role and activities of transnational corporations in the copper industry.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piesch (1975) excellently surveys this and other concentration measures. Although Piesch (1982) and Deffaa (1982) develop indices which are more qualified for oligopolistic markets, I chose the concentration ratio due to its simplicity, clearness and vividness.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See United Nations (1981: 29-32). The last point is stressed by Labys (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. This and the following examples are compiled from various issues of the Minerals Yearbook, from trade journals, and from annual reports of copper mining companies.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gluschke et al. (1979: 66-69) describe the problems of measuring capacity.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Most figures in this section are calculated from unpublished data, compiled by the Phelps Dodge Corporation Controller’s Department.

    Google Scholar 

  12. In a study for the World Bank the Charles River Associates (1979) found that three years elapse on an average from the official start of production to the date, when output is finally in line with the designed capacity.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Joralemon (1973: 371) and Minerals Yearbook (1972: 484; 1974: 506).

    Google Scholar 

  14. This figure was confirmed to me by industry officials.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Gluschke et al. (1979: 67).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The problems of financing mining investments are rather complex and a description of them lies beyond the scope of this book. For an in-depth study of foreign copper mine investments in Papua New Guinea and in Peru see Mikesell (1975). Radetzki and Zorn (1979) analyze the financing of mining projects in developing countries. Their study is summarized in Radetzki (1980) and Radetzki, Zorn (1980). The following account mainly relies on these sources.

    Google Scholar 

  17. New York Times, August 13th, 1981, News of the Week, p.5. McGill (1983) studies the financing of the Ok Tedi project.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petrick et al. (1973) analyze the economics of copper’s by-product metals.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Minerals Yearbook (1976:492).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calculated from Mineral Commodity Summaries (1984: 37).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Codelco (1982: 10).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See e.g. Mackenzie (1979: 22).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Section 4.1 describes the trade relations in the world copper industry.

    Google Scholar 

  24. New York Times, December 18th, 1980, News of the Week, p. 5. Sousa (1981: 52-56) lists comparative regulatory cost estimates for the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  25. It has often been recommended to copper producing developing countries to expand their domestic processing of ores to increase domestic value added and employment (see e.g. United Nations (1972)). This recommendation has been critically evaluated e.g. by Habenicht (1977), Adams, Behrman (1981) and McKern (1981). Gueronik (1974) concentrates on CIPEC’ s potential for semi-fabricating.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spendlove (1961, 1969) and Davis (1975) survey the methods of secondary copper production.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, Lambo and Schenck (1972b) review the literature on the collection of copper scrap. Bonczar and Tilton (1975) survey important determinants affecting scrap supply and demand.

    Google Scholar 

  28. In the next few decades the recovery of copper from electronic scrap (e.g. from multiple-pin plugs and collectors) may gain in importance. See e.g. Salisbury et al. (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Calculated from Fairchild Publications (1981: 86).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Estimates of the costs of converting scrap to refined copper vary considerably. See Gluschke et al. (1979: 89-91).

    Google Scholar 

  31. For data on energy requirements to recycle scrap see Chapman (1974), Arthur D. Little, Inc. (1978) or Kusik, Kenahan (1978), for instance. Data about the U.S. primary copper industry’s energy consumption are compiled in Rosenkranz (1976). The lower bound of the estimates in the text above is quoted by Siebert (1979: 411).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Section 4.3 describes the structure of the North American copper market.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The working of the London Metal Exchange is explained in Chapter 4.3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Labys, Rees and Elliott (1971) for empirical evidence supporting this hypothesis.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The preliminary 1983 figures are calculated from World Metal Statistics, March 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Grace (1978) compares recycling efforts in different countries. For West Germany alone see e.g. Grund (1981), for the United States consult Bonczar and Tilton (1975), for instance.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Gluschke et al. (1979: 98). Other studies for the United States point in a similar direction, for example Bergsten (1978: 149).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagenhals, G. (1984). Production. In: The World Copper Market. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45585-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45585-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13860-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45585-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics