Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 190))

Abstract

Decision processes in organizations can formally be described as decision problems with several decision makers and different utility functions. Game and bargaining approaches have to be taken into account as solution methods. They are characterized by the actual decision rule which describes, or rather determines, the decision behaviour of the organization members. For this rule certain requirements are set up, the fullfilment of which gives information, how far the presented approaches are useful for determining optimal decisions in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Contini, B. and Zionts, S.: Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives, in: Econometrica, 1968, pp. 397-414.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fandel, G.: Optimale Entscheidungen in Organisationen, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fandel, G. and Wilhelm, J.: Zur Entscheidungstheorie bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung, in: Zeitschrift für Operations Research, Volume 20, 1976, pp. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, J.W.: A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames, in: Review of Economic Studies, 1971, pp. 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geoffrion, A.M.: A Parametric Programming Solution to the Vector Maximum Problem, with Applications to Decisions under Uncertainty, Stanford/California, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harsanyi, J.C.: A Simplified Bargaining Model for the n-Person Cooperative Game, in: International Economic Review, 1963, pp. 194-200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isbell, J.R.: A Modification of Harsanyis Bargaining Model, in: Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1960, pp. 70-73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krelle, W.: A New Theory of Bargaining, Applied to the Problem of Wage Determination and Strikes, Institut für Gesellschafts-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bonn, Wirtschaftstheoretische Abteilung, Nr. 70, Bonn 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemaire, J.: A New Value for Games without Transferable Utilities, in: International Journal of Game Theory, Volume 2, 1973, pp. 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions, New York 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miyasawa, K.: The n-Person Bargaining Game, in: Dresher, M., Shapley, L.S. and Tucker, A.W. (eds.): Advances in Game Theory, Princeton/New Jersey 1964, pp. 547-575.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, J.F.: The Bargaining Problem, in: Econometrica, 1950, pp. 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nash, J.F.: Noncooperative Games, in: Annals of Mathematics, 1951, pp. 286-295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nash, J.F.: Two Person Cooperative Games, in: Econometrica, 1953, pp. 128-140.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shapley, L.S.: A Value for n-Person Games, in: Kuhn, H.W. and Tucker, A.W. (eds.): Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II, Princetown/New Jersey 1953, pp. 307-317.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shapley, L.S.: Values of Large Market Games: Status of the Problem, Memorandum RM-3957-PR, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica/ California, February 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M.: Pure Competition, Coalitional Power and Fair Division, in: International Economic Review, 1969, pp. 337-362.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shubik, M.: Games Decisions and Industrial Organization, in: Management Science, 1960, pp. 455-474.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simon, H.A.: A Comparison of Organization Theories, in: The Review of Economic Studies, 1952/53, pp. 40-48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thiriez, H. and Zionts, S. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeuthen, F.: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare, London 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zionts, S.: (ed.): Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fandel, G. (1981). Decision Concepts for Organizations. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics