Abstract
Decision processes in organizations can formally be described as decision problems with several decision makers and different utility functions. Game and bargaining approaches have to be taken into account as solution methods. They are characterized by the actual decision rule which describes, or rather determines, the decision behaviour of the organization members. For this rule certain requirements are set up, the fullfilment of which gives information, how far the presented approaches are useful for determining optimal decisions in organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Contini, B. and Zionts, S.: Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives, in: Econometrica, 1968, pp. 397-414.
Fandel, G.: Optimale Entscheidungen in Organisationen, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1979.
Fandel, G. and Wilhelm, J.: Zur Entscheidungstheorie bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung, in: Zeitschrift für Operations Research, Volume 20, 1976, pp. 1–21.
Friedman, J.W.: A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames, in: Review of Economic Studies, 1971, pp. 1-12.
Geoffrion, A.M.: A Parametric Programming Solution to the Vector Maximum Problem, with Applications to Decisions under Uncertainty, Stanford/California, 1965.
Harsanyi, J.C.: A Simplified Bargaining Model for the n-Person Cooperative Game, in: International Economic Review, 1963, pp. 194-200.
Isbell, J.R.: A Modification of Harsanyis Bargaining Model, in: Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1960, pp. 70-73.
Krelle, W.: A New Theory of Bargaining, Applied to the Problem of Wage Determination and Strikes, Institut für Gesellschafts-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bonn, Wirtschaftstheoretische Abteilung, Nr. 70, Bonn 1975.
Lemaire, J.: A New Value for Games without Transferable Utilities, in: International Journal of Game Theory, Volume 2, 1973, pp. 205–213.
Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions, New York 1958.
Miyasawa, K.: The n-Person Bargaining Game, in: Dresher, M., Shapley, L.S. and Tucker, A.W. (eds.): Advances in Game Theory, Princeton/New Jersey 1964, pp. 547-575.
Nash, J.F.: The Bargaining Problem, in: Econometrica, 1950, pp. 155-162.
Nash, J.F.: Noncooperative Games, in: Annals of Mathematics, 1951, pp. 286-295.
Nash, J.F.: Two Person Cooperative Games, in: Econometrica, 1953, pp. 128-140.
Shapley, L.S.: A Value for n-Person Games, in: Kuhn, H.W. and Tucker, A.W. (eds.): Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II, Princetown/New Jersey 1953, pp. 307-317.
Shapley, L.S.: Values of Large Market Games: Status of the Problem, Memorandum RM-3957-PR, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica/ California, February 1964.
Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M.: Pure Competition, Coalitional Power and Fair Division, in: International Economic Review, 1969, pp. 337-362.
Shubik, M.: Games Decisions and Industrial Organization, in: Management Science, 1960, pp. 455-474.
Simon, H.A.: A Comparison of Organization Theories, in: The Review of Economic Studies, 1952/53, pp. 40-48.
Thiriez, H. and Zionts, S. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1976.
Zeuthen, F.: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare, London 1930.
Zionts, S.: (ed.): Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fandel, G. (1981). Decision Concepts for Organizations. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive