Skip to main content

Multiobjective Programming Solutions to N-Person Bargaining Games

  • Conference paper
Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 190))

Abstract

The successful implementation of public policy often requires the cooperation of many individuals including those who can affect and those who are to be affected by the proposed policy. In this paper, the structure of such cooperation is modeled by combining multiobjective programming and solution techniques for n-person cooperative games.

An integer programming model, choses among the many possible configurations of coalitions the configuration that is optimal given the structure of the game. A linear programming model is then developed from the rationality postualtes of n-person game theory to induce participants to join the proper coalition in the optimal configuration. This inducement model apportions the cost savings realized by the formation of coalitions to the participants of the action in an economically efficient manner.

Evaluation of the shortcomings of the single objective inducement model leads to the formulation of a multiobjective inducement model that utilizes the economic efficiency objective as well as an objective designed to measure the equitable allocation of costs to the participants of the action. The stability of the bargaining situation is assessed at each noninferior solution to the multiobjective model. The multiobjective solutions thus derived are compared to and evaluated against conventional game theoretic solutions designed to equitably allocate “payoffs” to the participants of n-person bargaining games. The results of such a comparison demonstrate that a considerable amount of useful information can be generated by such multiobjective techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Berstresser, K. and P. L. Yu, “Domination Structures and Multicriteria Problems in N-Person Games,” Theory and Decision, 8, 1977, pp. 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, David, “An Analog of the Minimax Theorem for Vector Payoffs,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 6, 1, 1956, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke III, Roy and James P. Heaney, Collective Decisionmaking in Water Resources Planning, Lexington, Lexington Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, Jared L., Multiobjective Programming and Planning, New York, Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J. and D. Marks, “Multiobjective Screening Models and Water Resources Investment,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, 1973, p. 826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J., ReVelle, C., and S. Ratick, “Allocating Costs Among Participants in Regional Water Plans,” Paper presented at the Thirteenth American Water Resources Conference, Tucson, Arizona, November 1, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contini, Bruno and Stanley Zionts, “Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives,” Econometrica, Vol. 36, No. 2, April, 1968, pp. 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danzig, George B., “A Proof of the Equivalence of the Programming Problem and the Game Problem,” in Koopmans, Tjalling C. (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production Allocation, Cowles Foundation Monograph, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951, pp. 330–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freimer, M. and P. L. Yu, “Some New Results on Compromise Solutions for Group Decision Problems,” Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, February, 1976, pp. 688–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, David, The Theory of Linear Economic Models, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gately, Dermot, “Sharing the Gains from Regional Cooperation: A Game Theoretic Application to Planning Investment in Electric Power,” International Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, February, 1974, pp. 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giglio, Richard J. and Robert Wrightington, “Methods for Apportioning Costs Among Participants in Regional Systems,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1972, pp. 1133–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John C., Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations, Cambridge, Great Britain, Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leitman, George (ed.), Multicriteria Decision Making and Differential Games, New York, Plenum Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leohman, E. and others, “Cost Allocation for a Regional Wastewater Treatment System,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1979, p. 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, N-Person Game Theory, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, Herbert, The Computation of Economic Equilibria, Cowles Foundation Monograph, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973, pp. 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. and M. Shubik, “The Assignment Game I: The Core,” International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1972, pp. 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Mitsuo and Mikio Nakayama, “The Cost Assignment of the Cooperative Water Resource Development: A Game Theoretical Approach,” Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 10, June, 1976, pp. 1081–1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, John and Oskar Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic behavior, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, Jyrki and Stanley Sionts, “An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem,” Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, February, 1976, pp. 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Neil H., Combinatorial Set Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 91, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L., “A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems,” Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 8, April, 1973, pp. 936–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L., “Second-Order Game Problem: Decision Dynamics in Gaming Phenomena,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol. 27, No. 1, January 1979, pp. 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “Games with Multiple Payoffs,” International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 4, Issue 4, 1975, pp. 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ratick, S.J., Cohon, J., ReVelle, C. (1981). Multiobjective Programming Solutions to N-Person Bargaining Games. In: Morse, J.N. (eds) Organizations: Multiple Agents with Multiple Criteria. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45527-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10821-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45527-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics