Abstract
In the preceding chapter we arrived at the constraints (4.5) and (k.6) of our aggregate problem. The constraints (k.6) reflect the obvious restriction that the proportion of trips from and to each area must equal the given proportions of people living and working respectively in each area. (Incidentally, the division of the studied region into living areas may be different from the division into working areas and the number of living areas may be different from the number of working areas, which means that T ij need not be a square matrix.) The constraint (4.5) on the other hand reflects in a very crude and overall way a general desire of preserving some of the variation or interactivity or accessibility or freedom of choice of the individual trip makers (Confer Chapter 8). In a specific application it would of course be possible to add more specific constraints related to accessibility. This would ruin, however, the nice form of the solutions which makes the computations fairly easy. Other ways of computing may be used so that the addition of other constraints is possible. We shall limit ourselves, however, to the constraints (4.5) and (4.6).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erlander, S. (1980). The Objective Function and Our Minimization Problem. In: Optimal Spatial Interaction and the Gravity Model. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45515-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45515-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09729-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45515-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive