Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 164))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Books, Monographs, and Conference Proceedings

  1. Barrett, J. H., Individual Goals and Organizational Objectives: A Study of Integration Mechanisms, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane, J. L., and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Easton, A., Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P. C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Green, P. E. and F. J. Carmone, Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques in Marketing Analysis, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, P. E. and V. R. Rao, Applied Multidimensional Scaling: A Comparison of Approaches and Algorithms, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Green, P. E. and Y. Wind, Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Approach, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haimes, Y. Y., W. A. Hall and H. T. Freedman, Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources Systems, The Surrogate Worth Trade-off Method, Elsivier Scientific, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ignizio, J. P., Goal Programming and Extensions, Lexington Books, Massachusetts, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ijiri, Y., Management Goals and Accounting for Control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnsen, E., Studies in Multiobjective Decision Models, Monograph No. 1, Economic Research Center in Lund, Sweden, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa, Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, S. M., Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, Auerbach Publishers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leitmann, G. (ed.), Multicriteria Decision Making and Differential Games, Plenum Press, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leitmann, G. and A. Marzollo (eds.), Multicriteria Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, J. R. III, Professional Decision Making: A Procedure for Evaluating Complex Alternatives, Praeger, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Starr, M. K. and M. Zeleny (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, North Holland, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thiriez, H. and S. Zionts, (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Jouy-en-Josas, France, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wallenius, J., Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Methods: An Investigation and Approach, The Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wendt, D. and C. Vlek (eds.), Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, D. Reidel Pub. Co., Boston, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilhelm, J., Objectives and Multi-objective Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeleny, M., Linear Multiobjective Programming, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeleny, M. (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zionts, S. (ed.), Multiple Criteria Problem Solving: Proceedings, Buffalo, N. Y. (U.S.A.), 1977, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bell, D. E., R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa (eds.), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, Wiley, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sfeir-Yonnis, A. and D. W. Bromley, Decision Making in Developing Coun_ tries-Multiobjective Formulation and Evaluation Methods, Prueger, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Journal Articles, Technical Reports, Thesses

  1. Agarwal, S. K., “Optimizing Techniques for the Interactive Design of Transportation Networks under Multiple Objectives”, Ph,D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allesio, F. J., “Multiple Criteria in Environmental Control: Use of Economic Maximization Rules to Determine Relative Standards,” in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 544-549, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arrow, K., E. Barankin and D. Blackwell, “Admissible Points of Convex Sets”, in H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (eds,), Contributions to the Theory of Games, pp. 87-91, Princeton University Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashour, S., Sequencing Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972. [Chap. 3 Measures of Performance.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashton, D. J., and D. R. Atkins, “Multicriteria Programming for Financial Planning”, Presented at the 23rd International Meeting of TIMS, Athens, Greece, July 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Athans, M. and H. P. Geering, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Differentiable Nonscalar-Valued Functions to Attain Extrema, “IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control, Vol AC-18, No. 2, pp, 132-139, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aubin, J-P., “A Pareto Minimum Principle”, in H. W. Kuhn and G. P. Szegö (eds.), Differential Games and Related Topics, pp. 147–175, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Awerbuch, S., J. G. Ecker, and W. A. Wallace, “A Note: Hidden Nonlinearities in the Application of Goal Programming”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 918–920, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Awerbuch, S. and W. Wallace, “A Goal-Setting and Evaluation Model for Community Development”, IEEE Trans, of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-7, No. 8, pp. 589–597, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bammi, D. and D. Bammi, “Land Use Planning: An Optimizing Model”, OMEGA*, Vol 3, No. 5, pp. 583–594, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baron, D. P., “Stochàstic Programming and Risk Aversion”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 124-138, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baum, S. and R. C. Carlson, “Multigoal Optimization in Managerial Science”, OMEGA*, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 607–623, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumgarten, E. O., “An Investigation of the Goal Programming Method”, M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baumol, W. J., “The Firm and its Objectives”, in K. S. Palda (ed.), Readings in Managerial Economics, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beeson, R. M. and W. S. Meisel, “The Optimization of Complex Systems with Respect to Multiple Criteria”, IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Group Annual Symposium Record, IEEE, pp. 144-149, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Belenson, S. M. and K. C. Kapur, “An Algorithm for Solving Multi-criterion Linear Programming Problems with Examples”, Operational Reserach Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 65–77, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benayoun, R., O. Larichev, J. de Montgolfier, and J. Tergny, “Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: The Method of Constraints”, Automatic and Remote Control, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1257–1264, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benayoun, R., J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O. Larichev, “Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: Step Method (STEM)”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 366–375, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benayoun, R., J. Tergny, and D. Keuneman, “Mathematical Programming with Multi-objective Function: A Solution by P.O.P. (Progressive Orientation Procedure)”, METRA, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 279–299, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

*OMEGA — The International Journal of Management Science

  1. Benveniste, M., “Testing for Complete Efficiency in a Vector Maximization Problem”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 285–288, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bereanu, B., “Large Group Decision Making with Multiple Criteria”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 87-102, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergstresser, K., A. Charnes, and P. L. Yu, “Generalization of Domination Structures and Nondominated Solutions in Multicriteria Decision Making”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 3–13, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berhold, M., “Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Consumer Behavior”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 570-576, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernardo, J. and H. Länser, “A Capital Budgeting Decision Model with Subjective Criteria”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 261–275, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein, S. and W. Mellon, “Multidimensional Considerations in the Evaluation of Urban Policy”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 530-543, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertier, P. and J. de Montgolfier, “On Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to a Forest Management Problem”, METRA, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 33–45, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bettman, J. R., “A Graph Theory Approach to Comparing Consumer Information Processing Models”, Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Part II), pp. p114–p128, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilkey, W. J., “Empirical Evidence Regarding Business Goals”, in Ref. [BM-2] pp. 613-634, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birkin, S. J. and J. S. Ford, “The Quantity/Quality Dilemma: The Impact of a Zero Defects Program”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 517-529, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blackwell, D., “An Analog of the Minimax Theorem for Vector Payoffs”, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–8, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blaquiere, A., “Vector Valued Optimization in Multi-player Quantitative Games”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 33-54, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blin, J-M., “The General Concept of Multidimensional Consistency: Some Algebraic Aspects of the Aggregation Problem”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 164-178, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blin, J-M., “Fuzzy Sets in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 129-146, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boebion, J. and L. Pun, “A Series-Parallel Multiple-Criteria Model for a Scheduling Problem in the Dress-Making Industry”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 305-318, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bowling, A. L. and J. F. Hair, Jr., “Optimal Decisions on Multiple Objectives Through Canonical Analysis”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 729-731, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bowman, V. J., Jr., “On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multiple-Criteria Objectives”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 76-86, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boychuk, L. M. and V. O. Ovchinnikov, “Principal Methods for Solution of Multicriterial Optimization Problems (Survey)”, Soviet Automatic Control, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 1–4, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brauers, W. K., “Multiple-Criteria Decision Making with a Special Application on Defense Problems”, in Ref, [BM-18], pp. 199-200, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Briskin, L. E., “A Method of Unifying Multiple Objective Functions”, Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 10, p. B406–B416, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Briskin, L. E., “Establishing a Generalized Multi-Attribute Utility Function”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 236-245, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buffa, E. S. and J. S. Dyer, Management Science/Operations Research, Wiley, New York, 1977, (Chap. 4 Evaluative Models for Multiple Criteria).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bussey, L. E., The Economic Analysis of Industrial Projects, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1978, (Chap. 9 Multiple Projects and Constraints II (Extended Deterministic Formulations).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Candler, W., “Linear Programming in Capital Budgeting with Multiple Goals”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 416-428, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Candler, W. and M. Boehlje, “Use of Linear Programming in Capital Budgeting with Multiple Goals”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 325–330, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cantley, M. F., “The Choice of Corporate Objectives”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 36–41, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caplin, D. A. and J. S. H. Kornbluth, “Multiobjective Investment Planning Under Uncertainty”, OMEGA, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 423–441, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Castellani, G., “Explicit Solution for a Class of Allocation Problems”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 351-386, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chang, S. S. L., “General Theory of Optimal Processes”, Journal of SIAM Control, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 46–55, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Charnes, A., R. W. Clower, and K. O. Kortanek, “Effective Control Through Coherent Decentralization with Preemptive Goals”, Econometrica, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 294–320, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Vol. I, Wiley, New York, 1961. (Chap. 6, Appendix B, Basic Existence Theorems and Goal Programming).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, “Some Network Charaterizations for Mathematical Programming and Accounting Approaches to Planning and Control”, Accounting Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 24–52, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, “Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constriants”, Operations Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 18–39, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, “Goal Programming and Constained Regression — A Comment”, OMEGA, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 403–409, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, “Goal Programming and Multiple Objective Optimization — Part 1”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39–54, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, J. K. DeVoe, D. B. Learner, and W. Reinecke, “A Goal Programming Model for Media Planning”, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. B423–B430, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, D. Klingman, and R. J. Niehaus, “Explicit Solutions in Convex Goal Programming”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 438–448, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, D. B. Learner, and E. F. Snow, “Note on an Application of a Goal Programming Model for Media Planning”, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. B431–B436, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, K. A. Lewis, and R. J. Niehaus, “A Multi-Objective Model for Planning Equal Employment Opportunities”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 111-134, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, R. J. Niehaus, and A. Stedry, “Static and Dynamic Assignment Models with Multiple Objectives and Some Remarks on Organizational Design”, Management Science, Vol 15, No. 8, pp. B365–B375, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Charnes, A., and A. C. Stedry, “Search-Theoretic Models of Organization Control by Budgeted Multiple Goals”, Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 457–482, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chu, K. C., “On the Noninferior Set for the Systems with Vecotr-valued Objective Function”, IEEE Trans, on Automatic Cotnrol, Vol. AC-15, No. 5, pp. 591–593, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Churchman, C. W., “Morality as a Value Criterion”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 3-8, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Churchman, C. W. and R. L. Ackoff, “An Approximate Measure of Value”, Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 172–187, 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Chyung, D. H., “Optimal Systems with Multiple Cost Functionals”, SIAM Journal of Control, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 345–351, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cohon, J. L., “Applications of Multiple Objectives to Water Resources Problems”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 255-270, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cohon, J. L. and D. H. Marks, “Multiobjective Screening Models and Water Resource Investment”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 826–836, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cohon, J. L. and D. H. Marks, “Multiobjective Analysis in Water Resources Planning”, in R. de Neufville and D. Marks (eds.), Systems Planning and Design, pp. 304–321, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cohon, J. L. and D. H. Marks, “A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Programming Techniques”, Water Resources Research, Vol, 11, No. 2, pp. 208–220, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Collins, D. C., “Applications of Multiple Criteria Evaluation to Decision Aiding”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 477-505, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Contini, M. B., “A Decision Model Under Uncertainty with Multiple Payoffs”, in A. Mensch (ed.), Theory of Games: Techniques and Applications, pp. 50–63, English Univeristy Press, London, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Contini, B., “A Stochastic Approach to Goal Programming”, Operations Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 576–856, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Contini, B. and S. Zionts, “Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives”, Econometrica, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 397–414, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Courtney, Jr., J. F., T. H. Klastorin, and T. W. Ruefli, “A Goal Programming Approach to Urban-Suburban Location Preferences”, Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. B258–B268, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Crawford, A. B., “Impact Analysis Using Differentially Weighted Evaluative Criteria”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 732-735, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Crowston, W. B. and P. R. Kleindorfer, “Coordinating Multi-Project Networks”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 668-685, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  57. DaCunha, N. O., and E. Polak, “Constrained Minimization under Vector-Valued Criteria in Finite Dimensional Spaces”, Journal of Math. Anal, and Appl., Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 103–124, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dalkey, N. C., “Group Decision Analysis”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 45-74, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Dauer, J. P. and R. J. Krueger, “An Iterative Approach to Goal Programming”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3ii, pp. 671–681, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. David, L. and L. Duckstein, “Multicriterion Ranking of Alternative Long-range Water Resources Systems”, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 731–754, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dawes, R. M., “A Case Study of Graduate Admissions: Applications of Three Principles of Human Decision Making”, American Psychologist, Vol 26, No. 2, pp. 180–188, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dawes, R. M., “Objective Optimization Under Multiple Subjective Functions”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 9-17, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dawes, R. M. and J. Eagle, “Multivariate Selection of Students in a Racist Society: A Systematically unfair Approach”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 97-110, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Day, R. H. and S. M. Robinson, “Economic Decisions with L** Utility”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 84-92, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dean, J. H. and C. S. Shih, “Multiattribute Water Resources Decision Making”, AIIE Trans., Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 408–413, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  66. De Neufville, R. and R. L. Keeney, “Use of Decision Analysis in Airport Development for Mexico City”, in A. Drake, R. L. Keeney and P. Morse (eds.) Analysis of Public Systems, pp. 497–519, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  67. De Neufville, R. and R. L. Keeney, “Multiattribute Preference Analysis for Transportation Systems Evaluation”, Transportaiton Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 63–76, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Dinkelbach, W. and H. Isermann, “On Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria and Under Incomplete Information”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 302-312, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  69. diRoccaferrera, G. M. F., “Behavioral Aspects of Decision Making Under Multiple Goals”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 635-656, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Dyer, J. S., “Interactive Goal Programming”, Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 62–70, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Dyer, J. S., “An Empirical Investigation of a Man-Machine Interactive Approach to the Solution of Multiple Criteria Problem”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 202-216, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Dyer J. S., “The Effect of Error in the Estimation of the Gradient on the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm, with Implications for Interactive Programming”, Operations Research, Vol 22, No. 1, pp. 160–174, 1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Dyer, J. S., “A Time-Sharing Computer Program for the Solution of the Multiple Criteria Problem”, Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1379–1383, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Easton, A., “One-of-a-Kind Decisions Involving Weighted Multiple Objectives and Disparate Alternatives”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 657-667, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Eckenrode, R. T., “Weighing Multiple Criteria”, Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 180–192, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ecker, J. G. and I. A. Kouada, “Finding Efficient Points for Linear Multiple Objective Programs”, Mathematica1 Programming, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 375–377, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Edwards, W., “How to use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-7, No. 5, pp. 326–340, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Eilon, S., “Goals and Constraints in Decision-Making”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol 23, No. 1, pp. 3–15, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Elayat, H. and S. Jaisingh, “Multiple Objective Linear Programming Model for Decision Analysis”, Presented at the 4th International Conference on Production Reserach, Pre-print 11.2, Tokyo, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Evans, J. P. and R. E. Steuer, “A Revised Simplex Method for Linear Multiple Objective Programs”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 54–72, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Evans, J. P. and R. E. Steuer, “Generating Efficient Extreme Points in Linear Multiple Objective Programming: Two Algorithms and Computing Experience”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 349-365, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Falkson, L. M., “Discussion: ‘Approaches to Multi-objective Planning in Water Resources Projects’, by B. W. Taylor III, R. Davis, and R. M. North”, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 12, No, 5, pp. 1071–1077, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Fandel, G. and J. Wilhelm, “Rational Solution Principles and Information Requirements as Elements of a Theory of Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 215-231, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Farquhar, P. H., “A Survey of Multiattribute Utiliity Theory and Applications”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 59-90, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Farquhar, P. H. and V. R. Rao, “A Balance Model for Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 528–539, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Feinberg, A., “An Experimental Investigation of an Interactive Approach for Multi-criterion Optimization, with an Application to Academic Resource Allocation”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Feinberg, A., “Incorporation of Political Objectives in Multi-criteria Decision Making Involving Multiple Constituencies”, Presented at the 23rd International Meeting of TIMS, Athens, Greece, July 25–27, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ferguson, C. E., “The Thoery of Multidimensional Utility Analysis in Relation to Multiple-Goal Business Behavior: A Synthesis”, The Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 169–175, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ferguson, C. E. and R. Blair, “Inferior Factors, Externalities and Pareto Optimality”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 17–25, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Fichefet, J., “GPSTEM: An Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Method”, in A. Prekopa (ed.), Progress in Operations Research, Vol. 1, pp. 317–332, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Firstman, S. I. and D. S. Stoller, “Establishing Objectives, Measures, and Criteria for Multi-Phase Complementary Activities,” Operations Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 84–99, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Fischer, G. W., “Experimental Applications of Multi-attribute Utility Models”, in Ref. [BM-20], pp. 7-45, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Fishburn, P. C., “Additive Utilities with Finite Sets: Applications in the Management Sciences”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1–10, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Fishburn, P. C., “Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey”, Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 11, pp. 1442–1471, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Fishburn, P. C., “Bernoullian Utilities for Multiple-Factor Situations”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 47-61, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Fishburn, P. C. and R. L. Keeney, “Seven Independence Concepts and Continuous Multiattribute Utility Functions”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 294–327, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Forsyth, J. D., “Utilization and Goal Programming in Production and Capital Expenditure Planning”, CORS Journal*, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 136–140, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Forsyth, J. D. and D. J. Laughhunn, “Capital Rationing in the Face of Multiple Organizational Objectives”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 439-446, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Frederick, D. G., “Multiple Objectives in Bayesian Analysis: An Applied Case”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 736-737, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Freeman, A. M. III and R. H. Haveman, “Benefit-Cost Analysis and Multiple Objectives: Current Issues in Water Resources Planning”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 1533–1539, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

*CORS Journal — Canadian Operations Research Society (later renamed as INFOR)

  1. Freimer, M. and P. L. Yu, “An Approach Toward Decision Problems with Multiobjectives”, Center for System Sciences, CSS No. 72-03, University of Rochester, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Freimer, M. and P. L. Yu, “The Applications of Compromise Solutions to Reporting Games”, in A. Rapoport (ed.), Games Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution, pp. 235–260, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Freimer, M. and P. L. Yu, “Some New Results on Compromise Solutions for Group Decision Problems”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 688–693, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gal, T. and J. Nedoma, “Multiparametric Linear Programming”, Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 406–421, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardiner, P. C. and W. Edwards, “Public Values: Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making”, in M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (eds.), Human Judgement and Decision Processes, pp. 1–37, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gembicki, F., “Performance and Sensitivity Optimization: A Vector Index Approach”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserach University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geoffrion, A. M., “Strictly Concave Parametric Programming, Part I: Basic Theory”, Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 244–253, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geoffrion, A. M., “Strictly Concave Parametric Programming, Part II: Additional Theory and Computational Considerations”, Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 359–370, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geoffrion, A. M., “Solving Bicriterion Mathematical Programs”, Operations Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 39–54, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geoffrion, A. M., “Proper Efficiency and the Theory of Vector Maximization”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 618–630 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geoffrion, A. M., J. S. Dyer, and A. Feinberg, “An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department”, Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 4(Part I), pp. 357–368, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Geoffrion, A. M. and W. Hogan, “Coordination of Two-level Organizations with Multiple Objectives”, in A. Balakrishnan (ed.), Techniques of Optimization, pp. 455–466, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geogescu-Roegen, N., “Choice, Expectations and Measurability,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 503–541, 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giauque, W. C. and T. C. Peebles, “Application of Multidimensional Utility Theory in Determining Optimal Test-Treatment Strategies for Streptococcal Sore Throat and Rheumatic Fever”, Operations Research, Vol. 24, No. 5, p. 933–950, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbs, T. E., “Goal Programming”, Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 38–41, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goffin, J-L. and A. Haurie, “Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Pareto Optimality in a Multicriterion Perturbed System”, in R. Contini and A. Ruberti (eds.), 5th Conference on Optimization Techniques, Part I, pp. 184–193, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Goffin, J-L. and A. Haurie, “Pareto Optimality with Nondifferentiable Cost Functions”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 232-246, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman, D. A., “A Goal Programming Approach to Aggregate Planning of Production and Work Force”, Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 12, pp. 1569–1575, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Green, P. E., “Multidimensional Scaling and Conjoint Measurement in the Study of Choice Among Multiattribute Alternatives”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 577-609, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glim, R. L., T. G. Roefs and D. B. Kimball, “Quantifying Societal Goals: Development of a Weighting Methodology”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 612–622, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haimes, Y. Y. and W. A. Hall, “Multiobjectives in Water Resources Systems Analysis: The Surrogate Worth Trade Off Method”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 615–623, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haimes, Y. Y., L. S. Lasdon and D. A. Wismer, “On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-1, No. 3, pp. 296–297, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haimes, Y. Y., and D. A. Wismer, “A Computational Approach to the Combined Problem of Optimization and Parameter Identification,” Automatica, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 337–347, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall, W. A. and Y. Y. Haimes, “The Surrogate Worth Trade-off Method with Multiple Decision-makers”, in Ref. [BM-23], PP-207-234, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hammond, K. R., “Externalizing the Parameters of Quasirational Thought”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 75-96, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hanieski, J. F., “Technological Change as the Optimization of a Multidimensional Product”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 550-569, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hannan, E. L., “Effects of Substituting a Linear Goal for a Fractional Goal in the Goal Programming Problem”, Presented at the Joint TIMS/ORSA National Meeting, San Fransisco, May 9–11, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hansen, P., M. Anciaux-Mundeleer and P. Vincke, “Quasi-Kernels of Outranking Relations”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 53-63, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harnett, R. M. and J. P. Ignizio, “A Heuristic Program for the Covering Problem with Multiple Objectives”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 738-740, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harwood, G. B. and R. W. Lawless, “Optimizing Organization Goals in Assigning Faculty Teaching Schedules”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 513–524, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hasenauer, R., “Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Application of Goal Programming with Preemptive Priority Structures”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 120-135, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hatry, H. P., “Measuring the Effectiveness of Non-Defense Public Programs,” Operations Research, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 772–784, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haurie, A., “On Pareto Optimal Decisions for a Coalition of a Subset of Players,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-18, No. 2, pp. 144–149, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haurie, A. and M. C. Delfour, “Individual and Collective Rationality in a Dynamic Pareto Equilibrium”, in Ref. [BM-14], pp. 149-162, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hawkins, C. A. and R. A. Adams, “A Goal Programming Model for Capital Budgeting”, Financial Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 52–57, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heenan, D. A. and R. B. Addleman, “Quantitative Techniques for Today’s Decision Makers”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 32–62, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hemming, T., “A New Method for Interactive Multiobjective Optimization: A Boundary Point Ranking Method”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 333-340, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hill, M., “Goals-Achievement Matrix for Evaluating Alternative Plans,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 19–28, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hirsch, G., “The Notion of Characteristic Set and Its Implication for the Analysis and Development of MuIticriterion Methods”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 247-262, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hopkins, D. S. P., J.-C. Larŕeché, and W. F. Massy, “Multiattribute Reference Functions of University Administrators”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 287-290, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  41. House, P. W., “How Do You Know Where Youfre Going?”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 741-744, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, S. C., “Note on the Mean-Square Strategy of Vector Values Objective Function,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 364–366, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Huber, G. P., “Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies”, Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 10, pp. 1393–1402, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hughes, A. and D. Grawiog, Linear Programming: An Emphasis on Decision Making, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1973, (Chap. 15).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Humphreys, P. and A. Humphreys, “An Investigation of Subjective Preference Orderings for Multiattributed Alternatives”, in Ref. [BM-20], PP. 119-133, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hwang, C. L. and S. Paidy, “Regional Water Quality Management by Nonlinear Goal Programming”, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hwang, C. L., S. Paidy, K. Raju, and A. Masud, “Nonlinear Goal Programming Method — An Iterative Approach”, to be. published.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hwang, C. L., F. A. Tillman, K. Yoon, and A. Masud, “Optimum System Reliability by Nonlinear Goal Programming”, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ignizio, J. P., “An Approach to the Capital Budgeting Problem with Multiple Objectives”, The Engineering Economist, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 259–272, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ijiri, Y., “A Historical Cost Approach to Aggregation of Multiple Goals”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 395-405, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Isermann, H., “Existence and Duality in Multiple Objective Linear Programming”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 64-75, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Isermann, H., “The Enumeration of the Set of All Efficient Solutions for a Linear Multiple Objective Programs”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3ii, pp. 711–725, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Isermann, H., “The Relevance of Duality in Multiple Objective Linear Programming”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 241-262, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jaaskelainen, V., “A Goal Programming Model of Aggregate Production Planning”, The Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 14–29, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jackman, H. W., “Financing Public Hospitals in Ontario: A Case Study in Rationing of Capital Budgets”, Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Part 2), pp. 645–655, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., “How we can use the Notion of Semi-Orders to Build Outranking Relations in Multi-Criteria Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-20], pp. 87-111, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jaikumar, R., “A Heuristic 0–1 Algorithm with Multiple Objectives and Constraints”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 745-748, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Johnsen, E., “Experiences in Multiobjective Management Processes”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 135-152, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Juralewicz, R. S., “Interpersonal Dimensions of Decision Making in a Cross-Cultural Setting”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 749-752, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kafarov, V. V., G. B. Lazarev, and V. I. Avdeev, “Multicriterial Problems in the Control of Complex Chemical-Engineering Systems”, Soviet Physics-Doklady, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 344–345, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kapur, K. C., “Mathematical Methods of Optimization for Multi-objective Transportation Systems”, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 4, No. 4 PP. 451–467, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Keen, P. G. W., “The Evolving Concept of Optimality”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 31-58, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Keeney, R. L., “Utility Independence and Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences”, Operations Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 875–893, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Keeney, R. L., “An Illustrated Procedure for Assessing Multiattributed Utility Functions”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 37–50, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Keeney, R. L., “Evaluating Multidimensional Situations Using a Quasi-Separable Utility Function,” IEEE Trans. on Man-Machine Systems, Vol. MMS-9, No. 2, pp. 25–28, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Keeney, R. L., “Risk Independence and Multiattributed Utility Functions”, Econometrica, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 27–39, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Keeney, R. L., “Examining Corporate Policy Using Multiattribute Utility Analysis”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 63–76, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Keeney, R. L., “Utility Functions for Multiattributed Consequences,” Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 5 (Part I), pp. 276–287, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Keeney, R. L., “Quantifying Corporate Preferences for Policy Analysis”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 293-304, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Keeney, R. L., “Concepts of Independence in Multiattribute Utility Theory”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 62-71, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Keown, A. J. and J. D. Martin, “A Chance Constrained Goal Programming Model for Working Capital Management”, The Engineering Economist, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 153–174, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Killough, L. N. and T. L. Souders, “A Goal Programming Model for Public Accounting Firms”, Accounting Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 268–279, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kirkwood, C. W., “Superiority Conditions in Decision Problems with Multiple Objectives”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-7, No. 7, pp. 542–544, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Klahr, C. N., “Multiple Objectives in Mathematical Programming”, Operations Research, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 849–855, 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Klahr, D., “Decision Making in a Complex Environment: The Use of Similarity Judgements to Predict Preferences”, Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 595–617, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Klinger, A., “Improper Solutions of the Vector Maximum Problem,” Operations Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 570–572, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Klinger, A., “Vector-Valued Performance Criteria,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-9, No. 1, pp. 117–118, 1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kolesar, P. and W. E. Walker, “An Algorithm for the Dynamic Relocation of Fire Companies”, Operations Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 249–274. 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kornbluth, J. S. H., “Duality, Indifference and Sensitivity Analysis in Multiple Objective Linear Programming”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 599–614, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kouada, I. A., “Linear Vector Maximization”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kuhn, H. W., and A. W. Tucker, “Nonlinear Programming”, in J. Neyman (ed.), Proceedings Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 481–491, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Kumar, P. C. and G. C. Philippatos, “A Goal Programming Formulation to the Selection of Portfolios by Dual-Purpose Funds”, Presented at the 23rd International Meeting of TIMS, Athens, Greece, July 25–27, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kumbaraci, T. E., “The Judgment of Improvement—Choice for Decisions Relating to Medical Efficacy”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 753-754, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kunreuther, H., “Extensions of Bowman’s Theory on Managerial Decision-Making”, Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. B415–B439, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ladany, S. P. and M. Aharoni, “Maintenance Policy of Aircraft According to Multiple Criteria”, International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 1093–1101, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Landsberger, M. and A. Subotnik, “Optimal Behavior of a Monopolist Facing A Bicriteria Objective Function”, Internatioanl Economic Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 581–600, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Larichev, O. I., “Man-Machine Procedures for Decision Making (Review),” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 32, No. 12, (part 2) pp. 1973–1983, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lasdon, L. S., “Duality and Decomposition in Mathematical Programming” IEEE Trans, on System Science and Cybernetics, Vol. SSC-4, No. 2, p. 86–100, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. LaValle, I. H., “On Admissibility and Bayesness When Risk Attitutde But Not the Preference Ranking Is Permitted to Vary”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 72-83, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lawrence, K. D. and J. J. Burbridge, “A Multiple Goal Linear Programming Model for Coordinated Production and Logistics Planning”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, March 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Lawrence, K. D. and J. J. Burbridge, “Multiobjective Linear Programming Models for the Blending of Materials Problem”, Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Production Research, Pre-print 11.1, Tokyo, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lawrence, K. D., S. M. Lawrence, and R. Berger, “Multiple Objective Linear Programming Models for Large-Scale Capital Expenditures”, Presented at the Joint TIMS/ORSA National Meeting, San Fransisco, May 9–11, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Lee, S. M., “Goal Programming for Decision Analysis of Multiple Objectives”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 11–24, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lee, S. M. and E. R. Clayton, “A Goal Programming Model for Academic Resource Allocation”, Management Science, Vol. 18, No. 8, pp. B395–B408, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Lee, S. M. and V. Jaaskelainen, “Goal Programming: Management’s Math Model”, Industrial Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 30–35, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Lee, S. M. and A. J. Lerro, “Capital Budgeting for Multiple Objectives”, Financial Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 58–66, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Lee, S. M. and A. J. Lerro, “Optimizing the Portfolio Selection for Mutual Funds”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 1087–1101, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lee, S. M. and L. J. Moore, “Multi-Criteria School Busing Models”, Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 703–715, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Lee, S. M. and L. J. Moore, “Optimizing Transportation Problems with Multiple Objectives”, AIIE Transactions, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 333–338, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lee, S. M. and R. L. Morris, “Integer Goal Programming Methods”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 273-289, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Lin, J. G., “Maximal Vectors and Multi-objective Optimization”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 41–64, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Lin, J. G., “Three Methods for Determining Pareto-Optimal Solutions of Multiple-Objective Problems”, in Y. Ho and S. Mitter (eds.), Directions in Large-Scale Systems, pp. 117–138, Plenum Press, New York, 1976.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  103. Lin, J. G., “Multiple Objective Optimization: Proper Equality Constraints (PEC) and Maximization of Index Vectors”, in Ref. [BM-14], pp. 103-128, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Lin, J. G., G. Katopis, S. Patellis, and H. Shen, “On Relatively Optimal Controls of Dynamic Systems with Vector Performance Indices”, Proceedings: 7th Annual Princeton Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 579-584, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Lin, S. A. Y., “Dynamic Growth of the Firm Under Uncertainty with Multiple Goals”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 755-759, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Loucks, D. P. (ed.), “Multiobjective Water Resources Planning — A Bibliography”, Report No. OWRT/WRSIC 75-206, Water Resource Scientific Information Center, Office of Water Research and Technology, U. S. Department of the interior, Washington, D. C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lucas, H. C, Jr., and J. R. Moore, Jr., “A Multiple-Criterion Scoring Approach to Information System Project Selection”, INFOR, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp 1–12, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  108. MacCrimmon, K. R., “Decision Making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach”, RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  109. MacCrimmon, K. R., “Improving the System Design and Evaluation Process by the Use of Trade-off Information: An Application to Northeast Corridor Transportation Planning”, RAND Memorandum, RM-5877-DOT, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  110. MacCrimmon, K. R., “An Overview of Multiple Objective Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 18-44, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  111. MacCrimmon, K. R. and M. Toda, “The Experimental Determination of Indifference Curves”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 433–450, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Mahoney, F. J. III, “The Design of Regression Experiments with Multiple Objectives”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 760-763, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Major, D. C., “Benefit-Cost Ratios for Projects in Multiple Objective Investment Programs”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 1174–1178, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Major, D. C., “Multiobjective Redesign of the Big Walnut Project”, in R. De Neufville and D. Marks (eds.), Systems Planning and Design, pp. 322–337, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Marks, D. H., “Water Quality Management”, in A. Drake, R. Leeney, and P. Morse (eds.), Analysis of Public Systems, p. 356-375, MIT Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Marschak, J., “Guided Soul-Searching for Multi-Criterion Decisions”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 1-16, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Marshall, H. E., “Cost Sharing and Multiobjectives in Water Resource Development”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1–10, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Marzollo, A. and W. Ukovich, “On Some Broad Classes of Vector Optimal Decisions and their Characterization”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 281-324, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Masud, A. and C. L. Hwang, “A Multiple Objective Energy Planning and Allocation Model”, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  120. McGrew, D. R., and Y. Y. Haimes, “Parametric Solution to the Joint System Identification and Optimization Problem,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 582–605, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Medanic, J., “Minimax Pareto Optimal Solutions with Application to Linear Quadratic Problems”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 55-124, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Meisel, W. S., “Tradeoff Decisions in Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 461-476, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Miller, J. R. III, “Assessing Alternative Transportation Systems”, RAND Memorandum, RM-5865-DOT, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Miller, W. L., and D. M. Byers, “Development and Display of Multiple Objective Project Impacts,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 11–20, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Miller, W. L. and S. P. Erickson, “The Impact of High Interest Rates on Optimum Multiple Objective Design of Surface Runoff Urban Drainage Systems”, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49–59, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Minnehan, R. F., “Multiple Objectives and Multigroup Decisions Making in Physical Design Situations”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 506-516, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Mitroff, I. I., “On Being Consistent: The Management of Inquiry as a Multi-Criteria Decision Problems”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 291-300, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Monarchi, D. E., “Interactive Algorithm for Multiple Objective Decision Making”, Technical Reports on Hydrology and Water Resources, (No. 6), University of Arizona, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Monarchi, D. E., C. C. Kisiel, and L. Duckstein, “Interactive Multi-objective Programming in Water Resources: A Case Study”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 837–850, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Monarchi, D. E., J. E. Weber, and L. Duckstein, “An Iteractive Multiple Objective Decision-Making Aid Using Nonlinear Goal Programming”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 235-253, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Morris, W. T., Engineering Economic Analysis, Reston Publishing Co., Reston, Virginia, 1976, (Chap. 7 Evaluating Outcomes — Multiple Criteria).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Narasimhan, S. L., “A Survey of Business Applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques”, Presented at the Joint TIMS/ORSA National Meeting, San Fransisco, May 9–11, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Neely, W.P., R.M. North, and J.C. Fortson, “Planning and Selecting Multi-objective Projects by Goal Programming” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 19–25, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Nijkamp, P. and J. B. Vos, “A Multicriteria Analysis for Water Resource and Land Use Development”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 513–518, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Okello, R.M., S. Kaufman, and S. Zionts, “A Multiple Objective Decision Procedure for University Admissions Planning”, presented at the Joint TIMS/ ORSA National Meeting, San Fransisco, May 9–11, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Ölander, F., “Search Behavior in Non-Simultaneous Choice Situations: Satisficing or Maximizing?”, in Ref. [BM-20], pp. 297-320, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Ören, T. I. and C. Y. Ören, “Solution Selection Techniques for Decision Making in Complex Systems”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 764-767, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Osteryoung, J. S., “Multiple Goals in the Capital Budgeting Decision”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 447-457, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Pascual, L. D. and A. Ben-Israel, “Vector-Valued Criteria in Geometric Programming,” Operations Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 98–104, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Pasternak, H. and U. Passy, “Bicriterion Mathematical Programs with Boolean Variables,” in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 327-348, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Pau, L. F., “Two-Level Planning with Conflicting Goals”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 263-273, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Philip, J., “Algorithms for the Vector Maximization Problem,” Mathematical Programming, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 207–229, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Philip, J., “An Algorithm for Combined Quadratic and Multiobjective Programming”, Ref. [BM-18], pp. 35-51, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Philippatos, G. C., “On the Specification of Viable Financial Goals”, Managerial Planning, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 11–16, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Philippatos, G. C., “Behavioral Implications of Discrepancies in Expectations Between the Firm and Its Stockholders with an Application to Dividend Policies”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 768-770, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Podrebarae, M. L. and S. S. Sengupta, “ Parametric Linear Programming: Some Extensions”, INFOR, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 305–319, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Polak, E., “On the Approximation of Solutions to Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 271-282, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Polak, E. and A. N. Payne, “On Multicriteria Optimization”, in Y. C. Ho and S. K. Mitter (eds.), Directions in Large-Scale Systems, pp. 77–94, Plenum Press, New York, 1976.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  149. Powell, J. and R. Vergin, “A Heuristic Model for Planning Corporate Financing”, Financial Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, p. 13–20, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Price, W. L., “Goal Programming and a Manpower Problem”, in P. L. Hammer and G. Zoutendijk (eds.), Mathematical Programming in Theory and Practice, pp. 395–416, North-Holland, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Price, W. L., “An Interactive Objective Function Generator for Goal Programmes”, Ref. [BM-18], pp. 147-158, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Price, W. L. and W. G. Piskor, “The Application of Goal Programming to Manpower Planning,” INFOR, Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 221–231, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Radner, R., “Satisficing”, in G. Marchuk (ed.), Optimization Techniques: IFIP Technical Conference, pp. 252–263, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  154. Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Rapoport, A., “Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 17-43, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Reeves, G., “Quadratic Goal Programming”, presented at the Joint TIMS/ORSA National Meeting, San Fransisco, May 9–11, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Reid, R. W., and S. J. Citron, “On Noninferior Performance Index Vectors,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 11–28, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Reid, R. W., and V. Vemuri, “On the Noninferior Index Approach to Large Scale Multi-Criteria Systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 291, No. 4, pp. 241–254, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Rider, K. L., “A Parametric Model for the Allocation of Fire Companies in New York City”, Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 146–158, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Ritzman, L. P. and L. J. Karjewski, “Multiple Objectives in Linear Programming-An Example in Scheduling Postal Resources”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 364–378, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Roy, B., “Problems and Methods with Multiple Objective Functions”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 239–266, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Roy, B., “From Optimization to Multi-Criteria Decision Aid: Three Main Operational Attitudes”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 1-34, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Roy, B., “A Conceptual Framework for a Prescriptive Theory of ‘Decision-Aidl’”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 179-210, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Roy, B., “How Outranking Relation Helps Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 179-201, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Roy, B., “Why Multicriteria Decision Aid may not Fit in with the Assessment of a Unique Criterion”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 283-286, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Ruefli, T. W., “A Generalized Goal Decomposition Model,” Management Science, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. B505–B518, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Ruefli, T. W., “Linked Multi-Criteria Decision Models”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 406-415, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Salama, A. I. A. and V. Gourishankar, “Optimal Control of Systems with a Single Control and Several Cost Functionals,” International Journal of Control, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 705–725, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Salama, A. I. A. and M. H. Hamza, “On the Optimization of Static Systems with Several Cost Measures,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-17, No. 1, pp. 170–172, 1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Salukvadze, M. E., “Linear Programming Problem with a Vector-Valued Performance Criterion,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 33, No. 5, (Part 1) pp. 794–799, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Salukvadze, M. E., “Optimization of Vector Functionals. I. The Programming of Optimal Trajectories,” Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1169–1178, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Salukvadze, M. E., “Optimization of Vector Functionals II. The Analytic Construction of Optimal Controls”, Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 32, No. 9, (part 1) pp. 1347–1357, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Salukvadze, M. “On the Existence of Solutions in Problems of Optimization under Vector Valued Criteria,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 203–217, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Sarin, R. K., “Interactive Evaluation and Bound Procedure for Selecting Multi-Attributed Alternatives”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 211-224, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Sartoris, W. L. and M. L. Spruill, “Goal Programming and Working Capital Management”, Financial Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 67–74, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Sayeki, Y. and K. H. Vespers, “Allocation of Importance in a Hierarchial Goal Structure,” Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 667–675, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Schiemenz, B., “Possibilities to Consider Multiple Criteria in Decision Situations” in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 274-292,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Schmidt, J. W. and G. K. Bennett, “Economic Multiattribute Acceptance Sampling,” AIIE Trans., Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 194–199, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Schmitendorf, W. E., “Cooperative Games and Vector-Valued Criteria Problems,” IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-18, No. 2, pp. 139–144, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Schmitendorf, W. E. and G. Moriarty, “A Sufficiency Condition for Coalitive Pareto-Optimal Solutions” in Ref. [BM-14], pp. 163-172,1976

    Google Scholar 

  181. Schroeder, R. G., “Resource Planning in University Management by Goal Programming”, Operations Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 700–710, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Schwartz, L. E., “Uncertainty Reduction Over Time in the Theory of Multiattributed Utility”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 108-123 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Schwartz, S. L., I. Vertinsky and W. T. Ziemba, “R&D Project Selection Behavior: Study Designs and Some Pilot Results”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 136-146, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Schwartz, S. L., I. Vertinsky, W. T. Ziemba and M. Bernstein, “Some Behavioural Aspects of Information Use in Decision Making: A Study of Clinical Judgements”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 378-391, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Seinfeld, J. H. and W. Z. McBridge, “Optimization with Multiple Performance Criteria,” I & EC Process Design and Development, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 53–58, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Sengupta, S. S., M. L. Podrebarac and T. D. H. Fernando, “Probabilities of Optima in Multi-Objective Linear Programmes,” in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 217-235, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Shapiro, J. F., “Multiple Criteria Public Investment Decision Making by Mixed Integer Programming”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 170-182, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Shepard, R. N., “On Subjectively Optimum Selection Among Multiattribute Alternatives,” in M. W. Shelly and G. L. Bryan (eds.), Human Judgments and Optimality, pp. 257–281, Wiley, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Slovic, P., “Analyzing the Expert Judge; A Discriptive Study of a Stockbroker’s Decision Processes”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 255–263, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Smith, R. D. and P. S. Greenlaw, “Simulation of a Psychological Decision Process in Personnel Selection”, Management Science, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. B409–B419, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Spivey, W. A. and H. Tamura, “Goal Programming in Econometrics”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 183–192, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Srinivasan, V. and A. Shocker, “MUMP — Multidimensional Unfolding via Mathematical Programming”, Working paper No. 7108, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Stadler, W., “Sufficient Conditions for Preference Optimality”, in Ref. [BM-14], pp. 129-148, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Stadler, W., “Preference Optimality and Applications of Pareto Optimality”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 125-226, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Stainton, R. S., “Production Scheduling with Multiple Criteria Objectives”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 21, pp. 285–292, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Starr, M. K. and I. Stein, The Practice of Management Science, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1976 (Unit 5 Decisions with Multiple Criteria).

    Google Scholar 

  197. Starr M. K. and L. H. Greenwood, “Normative Generation of Alternatives with Multiple Criteria Evaluation”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 111-128, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Starr, M. K. and M. Zeleny, “MCDM-State and Future of the Arts”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 5-29, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Stedry, A. C. and A. Charnes, “Investigation in the Theory of Multiple Budgeted Goals,” in C. P. Bonini, R. K. Jaedicke and H. M. Wagner, (eds.), Management Controls: New Directions in Basic Research, pp. 186–204, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Stern, R. J. and A. Ben-Israel, “On Linear Optimal Control Problems with Multiple Quadratic Criteria”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 366-372, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Steuer, R. E., “Linear Multiple Objective Programming: Theory and Computational Experience”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Steuer, R. E., “Multiple Objective Linear Programming with Interval Criterion Weights”, Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 305–316, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Steuer, R. E., “A Five Phase Procedure for Implementing a Vector-Maximum Algorithm for Multiple Objective Linear Programming Problems” in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 159-169, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  204. Steuer, R. E., “An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Procedure”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 225-239, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Steuer, R. E. and A. T. Schuler, “An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Approach to a Problem in Forest Management”, Operations Research, Vol.26, No.2, pp. 254–269, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Snyder, W. W., “Economic Policy and Multiple Objective Decision Making Lessons from the Postwar Period”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 771-733, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Taft, M. I. and A. Reisman, “A Proposed Generalized Heuristic Algorithm for Scheduling with Respect to n-Interrelated Criterion Functions,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 155–162, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Tamura, K., “A Method for Constructing the Polar Cone of a Polyhedral Cone, with Applications to Linear Multicriteria Decision Problems”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 547–564, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Taylor, B. W. III, K. R. Davis and R. M. North, “Approaches to Multiobjective Planning in Water Resources Projects”, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 999–1008, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Taylor, R. L., “Consistent Multiattributed Decision Procedures”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 774-778, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Tell, B., “A Comparative Study of Four Multiple-Criteria Methods”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 183-197, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Terry, H., “Comparative Evaluation of Performance Using Multiple Criteria”, Management Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 431–442, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Tersine, R. J., “Organizational Objectives and Goal Programming: A Convergence”, Managerial Planning, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 27–40, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Theil, H., “On the Symmetry Approach to the Committee Decision Problem”, Management Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 380–393, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Thiriez, H. and D. Houri, “Multi-Person Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A Sample Approach”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 103-119, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Togsverd, T., “Multi-Level Planning in the Public Sector”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 201-214, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Tomlinson, J. W. C. and I. Vertinsky, “Selecting a Strategy for Joint Venture in Fisheries: A First Approximation”, in REf. [BM-18], pp. 351-363, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  218. Trippi, R. R., “On the Evaluation of Investment Proposals Having Multiple Attributes”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 327–332, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  219. Turk, D. R., “Priorities Modeling Using Goal Growth Programming”, Report No. JCAP-DM-T701, Joint Conventional Ammunition Program Coordinating Group, Decision Models Directorate, Rock Island, Illinois, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Van De Panne, C, “A Node Method for Multiparametric Linear Programming”, Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1014–1020, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Vedder, J., “Planning Problems with Multidimensional Consequences,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 112–119, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. Vedder, J. N., “Multiattribute Decision Making Under Uncertainty Using Bounded Intervals”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 93-107, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Velichenko, V. V., “Sufficient Conditions for Absolute Minimum of the Maximal Functional in the Multi-Criteria Problem of Optimal Control”, in G. Marchuk (ed.), Optimization Techniques: IFIP Technical Conference, pp. 220–225, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  224. Vemuri, V., “Multiple Objective Optimization in Water Resource Systems”, Water Resources Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 44–48, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. Vincke, P., “A New Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision-Making”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 341-350, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  226. Viswanathan, B., V. V. Aggarwal, K. P. K. Nair, “Multiple Criteria Markov Decision Processes”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 263-272, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Volpato, M., “Estimating the Common Cost of a Good When the Local Costs are Known in the Countries of a Community,” in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 325-350, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Wacht, R. F. and D. T. Whitford, “A Goal Programming Model for Capital Investment Analysis in Nonprofit Hospitals”, Financial Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 37–47, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  229. Wallenius, H., J. Wallenius, and P. Varita, “An Approach to Solving Multiple Criteria Macroeconomic Policy Problems and an Application”, Working Paper 76-54, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  230. Wallenius, J., “Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Methods: An Investigation and an Approach”, Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, Series A:14, Helsinki School of Economics, Finalnd, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Wallenius, J., “Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization”, Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 1387–1396, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  232. Wallenius, J. and S. Zionts, “Some Tests of an Interactive Programming Method for Multicriterion Optimization and Attempt at Implementation”, in Ref. [BM-18], pp. 319-331, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Walters, A., J. Mangold, and E. Haran, “A Comprehensive Planning Model for Long-range Academic Strategies”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 727–738, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  234. Waltz, F. M., “An Engineering Approach: Hierarchical Optimization Criteria,” IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-12, No. 2, pp. 179–180, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  235. Welam, U. P., “Comments on Goal Programming for Aggregate Planning”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 708–712, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  236. Wendell, R. E. and D. N. Lee, “Efficiency in Multiple Objective Optimization Problems”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 406–414, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. Wheeler, B. M. and J. R. M. Russell, “Goal Programming and Agricultural Planning”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1i, pp. 21–32, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. White, C. M., “Multiple Goals in the Theory of the Firm,” in K. E. Boulding and W. A. Spivey (eds.), Linear Programming and the Theory of the Firm, pp. 181–201, Macmillan, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Williams, F. E., “On the Evaluation of Intertemporal Outcomes”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 429-438, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  240. Wind, Y. and L. Spitz, “Analytical Approach to Marketing Decisions in Health-Care Organizations,” Operations Research, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 973–990, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Winterfeldt, D. V., “Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Comments on Jacquet-Lagreze’s Paper”, in Ref. [BM-20], pp. 113-117, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Winterfeldt, D. V. and G. W. Fischer, “Multiattribute Utility Theory: Models and Assessment Procedures”, in Ref. [BM-20], pp. 47-85, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  243. Wright, P. L. and F. Barbour, “Phased Decision Strategies: Sequels to an Initial Screening”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 91-110, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  244. Yoon, K., “A Goal Programming Model for Korea Economic Planning”, M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  245. Yoon, K. and C. L. Hwang, “A Goal Programming Model for Development Planning: A Case of Korea”, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  246. Young, D. R., “Choosing Among Alternative Complex Systems When Input Characteristics are Uncertain”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-1, No. 1, pp. 77–82, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Yu, P. L., “Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points, and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 319–376, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  248. Yu, P. L., “Decision Dynamics with an Application to Persuasion and Negotiation”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 159-178, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  249. Yu, P. L., “Introduction to Domination Structures in Multicriteria Decision Problems”, in REf. [BM-2], pp. 249-261, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Yu, P. L., “Domination Structures and Nondominated Solutions”, in Ref. [BM-15], pp. 227-280, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  251. Yu, P. L. and G. Leitmann, “Compromise Solutions, Domination Structures, and Salukvadze’s Solution,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 362–378, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  252. Yu, P. L. and G. Leitmann, “Nondominated Decisions and Cone Convexity in Dynamic Multicriteria Decision Problems”, in Ref. [BM-14], pp. 61-72, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  253. Yu, P. L., and M. Zeleny, “The Set of all Non-Dominated Solutions in Linear Cases and a Multicriteria Simplex Method,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 368–430, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  254. Yu, P. L. and M. Zeleny, “Linear Multiparametric Programming by Multi-criteria Simplex Method”, Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 159–170, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  255. Zadeh, L. A., “Optimality and Nonscalar-Valued Performance Criteria,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-8, No. 1, pp. 59–60, 1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  256. Zadeh, L. A., “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 686-725, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  257. Zeleny, M., “A Selected Bibliography of Works Related to Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 779-796, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  258. Zeleny, M., “The Attribute-Dynamic Attitude Model (ADAM)”, Management Science, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 12–26, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  259. Zeleny, M., “A Concept of Compromise Solutions and the Method of the Displaced Ideal”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 479–496, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  260. Zeleny, M., “Compromise Programming”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 262-30, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  261. Zeleny, M., “The Theory of the Displaced Ideal”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 153-206, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  262. Zeleny, M., “MCDM Bibliography — 1975”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 291-321, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  263. Zeleny, M., “Adaptive Displacement of Preferences in Decision Making”, in Ref. [BM-17], pp. 147-158, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Zeleny, M., “Multicriteria Simplex Method: A Fortran Routine”, in Ref. [BM-23], pp. 323-345, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Zeleny, M. and J. L. Cochrane, “A Priori and A Posteriori Goals in Macroeconomic Policy Making”, in Ref. [BM-2], pp. 373-391, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  266. Zionts, S., “Integer Linear Programming with Multiple Objectives”, Working Paper No. 229, School of Management, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Zionts, S. and J. Wallenius, “An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem”, Management Science, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 652–663, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Supplement

  1. Abadie, J., and J. Carpenter, “Generalization of the Wolfe Reduced Gradient Method to the Case of Nonlinear Constraints”, in Optimization, R. Fletcher (editor), Academic Press, N. Y., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benson, R. G., “Interactive Multiple Criteria Optimization Using Satisfactory Goals”, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Iowa, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borreani-Ostanello, A. and P. Capillaro, “Efficient Solutions of a Multiple-Objective Programming Method, for a Problem of School Allocation and Dimensioning,” in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 55–60, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buyanov, B. B. and V. M. Ozernoy, “A Decision Method Using Vector Criterion”, Engineering Cybernetics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 49–54, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson, R. C. and H. H. Therp, “A Multicriteria Approach to Strategic Planning: An Application in Inventory Control”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 75–33, North-Ho Hand, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsson, C., “An Approach to Adaptive Multigoal Control using Fuzzy Automata”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 85–93, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, D. and B. H. P. Rivett, “A Structural Mapping Approach to Complex Decision-Making”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 113–128, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dauer, J. P. and R. J. Krueaer, “An Iterative Approach to Goal Programming”, Report no. T. R. 76-1, Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deckro, R. F., “Multiple Objective Districting: A General Heuristic Approach Using Multiple Criteria”, Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 4ii, PP. 953–961, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Despontin, M. and P. Vincke, “Multiple Criteria Economic Policy”, in M. Rouhens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 119–128, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DiGuglielmo, F., “Nonconvex Duality in Multiobjectiye Optimization”, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 285–291, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorfman, R., and H. Jacoby, “A Model fo Public Decision Illustrated by a Water Pollution Policy Problem, The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System”, pp. 226-276, Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress, 1st Session, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Einhorn, H. J. and W. McCoach, “A Simple Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation”, Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 270–282, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flavell, R. B. and G. R. Salkin, “Resource Allocation in a Decentralized Organisation”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 169–175, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frank, M. and P. Wolfe, “An Algorithm for Quadratic Programming”, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1 and 2, pp. 95–110, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gal, T., “A General Method for Determining the Set of All Efficient Solutions to a Linear Vectormaximum Problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 307–322, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gal, T. and H. Leberling, “Redundant Objective Functions in Linear Vector Maximum Problems and Their Determination”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 176–184, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gal, T. and H. Leberling, “Relaxation Analysis in Multi-Criteria Linear Programming: An Introduction”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 177–180, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geoffrion, A. M., “Vector Maximal Decomposition Programming”, Working paper No. 164, Western Management Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, September 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Giordano, J.-L. and J.-C. Suquet, “On Multicriteria Decision Making: An Application to a Work-Shop Organization Problem”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 181–192, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Griffith, R. E., and P. A. Stewart, “A Nonlinear Programming Technique for the Optimization of Continuous Processing Systems,” Management Science Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 379–392, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang, C. L., K. C. Lai, F. A. Tillman, and L. T. Fan, “Optimization of Systems Reliability by the Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique”, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, Vol. R-24, pp. 133–135 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang, C. L., J. L. Williams, and L. T. Fan, “Introduction to the Generalized Reduced Gradient Method”, Institute for Systems Design and Optimization, Report No. 39, Kansas State University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang, C. L., F. A. Tillman, W. K. Wei, and C. H. Lie, “Optimal Scheduled Maintenance Policy based on Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., “Explicative Models in Multicriteria Preference Analysis”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 213–218, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keeney, R. L. and A. Sickerman, “Assessing and Analyzing Preferences Concerning Multiple Objectives: An Interactive Computer Program”, Behavioral Science, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 173–182, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kornbluth, J. S. H., “A Survey of Goal Programming”, OMEGA, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 193–205, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ladd, E. R., “A Dynamic Programming Approach to Goal Programming”, Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, H. B., “Integer Programming and Nonlinear Integer Goal Programming Applied to Systems Reliability Problems”, M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lhoas, J., “Multi-criteria Decision Aid Application to the Selection of the Route for a Pipe-Line”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 265–273, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loucks, D. P., “Planning for Multiple Goals”, in C. R. Blitzer, P. B. Clark and L. Taylor (eds.), Economy-Wide Models and Development Planning, pp. 213–233, Oxford University Press, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Masud, A.S.M. “A Study of Multiple Objective Decision Making-Methods and Applications”, Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McMillan, C. Jr., Mathematical Programming, (Chapter 14, Mathematical Programming with Multiple Objectives) Wiley, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Oppenheimer, K. R., “A Proxy Approach to Multi-Attribute Decision Making”, Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 675–689, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Parthasarathy, T. and T. E. S. Raghavan, Some Topics in Two-Persons Games, American Elserier, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Raju, K. S., “Iterative Nonlinear Goal Programming and Application to Production Planning Problems”, M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rodder, W., “A Duality Theory for Linear Vector Optimum Problems”, in M Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 405–407. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz, S. L. and I. Vertinsky, “Multi-attribute Investment Decisions: A Study of R & D Project Selection,” Management Science Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 285–301, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steuer, R. E., “ADEX: An Adjacent Efficient Extreme Point Algorithm for Solving Vector-Maximum and Internal Weighted-Sums Linear Programming Problems,” SHARE Program Library Agency, Distribution Code 360D-15, 2.014, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steuer, R. E., “ADBASE: An Adjacent Efficient Basis Algorithm for Solving Vector-Maximum and Internal Weighted Sums Linear Programming Problems,” (in FORTRAN), College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Streeter, H. W. and E. B. Phelps, “A Study of the Pollution and Natural Purification of the Ohio River, Illinois Factors Concerned in the Phenomenon of Oxidation and Reaeration”, Public Health Service Bulletin, Vol. 146 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tantasuth, V., “Goal Programming and Long Range Planning in Underdeveloped Countries”, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas Tech University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tell, B., “The Effect of Uncertainty on the Selection of a Multiple-Criteria Utility Model”, in M. Roubens (ed.), Advances in Operations Research, pp. 497–504, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Theil, H., Optimal Decision Rules for Government and Industry, Rand McNally and Company, Chicago, 1964. (Chap.).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Trzeciak, J. M., “Computational Aspects of Linear Multiple Objective Optimization”, Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wehrung, D. A., D. S. P. Hopkins and W. F. Massy, “Interactive Preference Optimization for University Administrators”, Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 599–611, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wei, W. K., “Optimal Scheduled Maintenance Policy based on Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, M.S. Thesis, Kansas State University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wendell, R. E., A. P. Hunter, Jr., and T. J. Lowe, “Efficient Points in Location Problems”, AIIE Transactions, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 238–246, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wilhelm, J., “Generalized Solution Principles and Out-ranking Relations in Multi-Criteria Decision-making”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 376–385, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Simon, H. A., “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 99–118, 1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Himmelblau, D. M., Applied Nonlinear Programming, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972. (Chapter 9, Evaluation of Constrained Nonlinear Programming Techniques).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hwang, CL., Masud, A.S.M. (1979). Bibliography. In: Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 164. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09111-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45511-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics