Advertisement

Defensive Secretions of Millipeds

  • T. Eisner
  • D. Alsop
  • K. Hicks
  • J. Meinwald
Part of the Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology / Handbuch der experimentellen Pharmakologie book series (HEP, volume 48)

Abstract

The millipeds, comprising the arthropodan class Diplopoda, are a relatively uniform and unspectacular lot. Generally slow and sluggish despite their many legs, they are for the most part furtive vegetarian scavengers, active primarily at night. Only about 7500 species have been described (KAESTNER, 1968). In a numerical sense, therefore, and certainly relative to the insects, they represent one of the less successful experiments in terrestrial arthropodan evolution. But in another sense they are all but unsuccessful. They are an ancient group dating back to Devonian times, and they have held their own to this day, despite the evolutionary diversification of those very animals, the vertebrates, insects, and arachnids, that have come to include the primary predacious enemies of millipeds. Survival under hazardous conditions presupposes the possession of effective means of defense, and millipeds do indeed possess such means. Anyone who has collected these animals in the field is familiar with the odorous and often noxiously irritating fluids that so many of them emit when handled. These fluids are the products of special exocrine defensive glands that have evolved, quite clearly, for protection against predation. Much has been learned about the chemistry and biology of these glands. It is our purpose here to summarize this work.

Keywords

Anthranilic Acid Aristolochic Acid Hydrogen Cyanide Cyanogenic Glycoside Defensive Secretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, P.L., Dittmer, D.S.: Biology Data Book. 2nd Ed. Bethesda, Md: Fed. of Amer. Socs. for Exp. Biol., 1973, Vol. II, Sect. 80, Part I.Google Scholar
  2. Armarego, W.L.F.: Quinazolines. In: Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry (Katritzky, A.R. ed.), New York, Academic Press, 1963, Vol. I, pp. 253–309.Google Scholar
  3. Barbetta, M., Casnati, G., Pavan, M.: Sulla presenza di D-(+)-mandelonitrile nella secrezione difensiva del miriapode Gomphodesmus pavani Dem. Mem. Soc. Entomol. Ital. 45, 169–176 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. Barbier, M.: Separations de p-benzoquinones naturelles par chromatoplaques. J. Chromat. 2, 649–651 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier, M., Lederer, E.: On the benzoquinones of the venom of three species of myriapods. Biokhimiya 22, 221–225 (1957).Google Scholar
  6. Barth, R.: Microanatomia e citologia das glandulas penconhentas de Rhinocricus padbergii (Diplopoda). Mem. Inst. Osw. Cruz 65, 175–195 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Béhal, A., Phisalix, M.C.: La quinone, principe actif du venin du Julus terrestris. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 52, 1036–1038 (1900).Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Yehoshua, S., Conn, E.E.: Biosynthesis of prunasin, the cyanogenic glycoside of peach. Plant Physiol. 39, 331–333 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum, M.S., MacConnell, J.G., Brand, J.M., Duffield, R.M., Fales, H.M.: Phenol and benzaldehyde in the defensive secretion of a strongylosomid millipede. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 66, 235 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. Blum, M.S., Woodring, J.P.: Secretion of benzaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide by the millipede Pachydesmus crassicutis (Wood). Science 138, 512–513 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt, J.F.: Rapport prealable relatif aux recherches ulterieures sur l’histoire, l’anatomie et la physiologie des Glomerides. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersbourg 6, 152–155 (1839).Google Scholar
  12. Bull, L.B., Culvenor, C.C.J., Dick, A.T.: The Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1968.Google Scholar
  13. Burtt, E.: Irritant exudation from a millipede. Nature (Lond.) 142, 796 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burtt, E.: Exudate from millipedes with particular reference to its injurious effects. Trop. Dis. Bull. 44, 7–12 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Casnati, G., Nencini, G., Quilico, A., Pavan, M., Ricca, A., Salvatori, T.: The secretion of the myriapod Polydesmus collaris collaris (Koch). Experentia (Basel) 19, 409–415 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakravarti, D., Chakravarti, R.N., Cohen, L.A., Dasgupta, B., Datta, S., Miller, H.K.: Alkaloids of Glycosmis arborea II. Structure of arborine. Tetrahedron 16, 224 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chamberlin, R.V.: Results of the Bryant Walker Expeditions of the University of Michigan to Colombia, 1913, and British Guiana, 1914. The Diplopoda. Occ. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 133, 1–142 (1923a).Google Scholar
  18. Chamberlin, R.V.: On four termitophilous millipedes from British Guiana. Zoologica 3, 411–421 (1923b).Google Scholar
  19. Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L.: The enemies of myriapods. Naturalist 831, 137–141 (1949).Google Scholar
  20. Conn, E.E., Butler, G.W.: The biosynthesis of cyanogenic glycosides and other simple nitrogen compounds. In: Perspectives in Phytochemistry (Harborne, J.B., Swain, T., eds.), pp. 47–74. New York, Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Conner, W.E., Jones, T.H., Eisner, T., Meinwald, J.: Benzoyl cyanide in the defensive secretion of polydesmoid millipeds. Experientia (Basel) 33, 206 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cook, O.F.: Camphor secreted by an animal (Polyzonium). Science N.S. 12, 516–521 (1900).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coolidge, K.R.: Secretion of hydrocyanic acid by Leptodesmus haydenianus, Wood. Canad. Entomol. 41, 104 (1909).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davenport, D., Wootton, D.M., Cushing, J.E.: The biology of the Sierra luminous millipede, Luminodesmus sequoiae, Loomis and Davenport. Biol. Bull. 102, 100–110 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dohle, W.: Die Embryonalentwicklung von Glomeris marginata (Villers) im Vergleich zur Entwicklung anderer Diplopoden. Zool. Jb. Anat. 81, 241–310 (1964).Google Scholar
  26. Donisthorpe, H. St. J. K.: The Guests of British Ants, their Habits and Life Histories. London, Routledge, 1927.Google Scholar
  27. Duffey, S.S., Blum, M.S., Fales, H.M., Evans, S.L., Roncadori, R.W., Tiemann, D.L., Nakagawa, Y.: Benzoyl cyanide and mandelonitrile benzoate in the defensive secretions of millipedes. J. Chem. Ecol. 3, 101–113 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duffield, R.M., Blum, M.S., Brand, J.M.: Guaicol in the defensive secretions of polydesmid millipedes. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 67, 821–822 (1974).Google Scholar
  29. Effenberger, W.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Polydesmus. Z. Naturwiss. Jena 44, 527–586 (1909).Google Scholar
  30. Eisner, H.E., Alsop, D.W., Eisner, T.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. XX. Quantitative assessment of hydrogen cyanide production in two species of millipedes. Psyche 74, 107–117 (1967).Google Scholar
  31. Eisner, H.E., Eisner, T., Hurst, J.J.: Hydrogen cyanide and benzaldehyde produced by millipedes. Chem. and Ind. 124-125 (1963).Google Scholar
  32. Eisner, H.E., Wood, W.F., Eisner, T.: Hydrogen cyanide production in North American and African polydesmoid millipedes. Psyche 82, 20–23 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisner, T.: Mongoose and millipedes. Science 160, 1367 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisner, T.: Chemical defense against predation in arthropods. In: Chemical Ecology (Sondheimer, E., and Simeone, J.B. eds.), pp. 157–217. New York, Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. Eisner, T., Davis, J.A.: Mongoose throwing and smashing millipedes. Science 155, 577–579 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eisner, T., Eisner, H.E.: Mystery of a millipede. Nat. Hist. 74, 30–37 (1965).Google Scholar
  37. Eisner, T., Eisner, H.E., Hurst, J.J., Kafatos, F.C., Meinwald, J.: Cyanogenic glandular apparatus of a millipede. Science 139, 1218–1220 (1963a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eisner, T., Hendry, L.B., Meinwald, J.: 2,5-Dichlorophenol (from ingested herbicide?) in defensive secretion of grasshopper. Science 172, 277–278 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Eisner, T., Hurst, J.J., Keeton, W.T., Meinwald, Y.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. XVI. Para-benzoquinones in the secretion of spirostreptoid millipedes. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 58, 247–248 (1965).Google Scholar
  40. Eisner, T., Hurst, J.J., Meinwald, J.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. XL The structure, function, and phenolic secretions of the glands of a chordeumoid millipede and a carabid beetle. Psyche 70, 94–116 (1963b).Google Scholar
  41. Eisner, T., Johnessee, J.S., Carrel, J., Hendry, L.B., Meinwald, J.: Defensive use by an insect of a plant resin. Science 184, 996–999 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Eisner, T., Meinwald, J.: Defensive secretions of arthropods. Science 153, 1341–1350 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eisner, T., Zahler, S.A., Carrel, J.E., Brown, D.J., Lones, G.W.: Absence of antimicrobial substances in the egg capsules of millipedes. Nature (Lond.) 225, 661 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans, M.E.G., Blower, J.G.: A jumping millipede. Nature (Lond.) 246, 427–428 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Feigel, F.: Spot Tests in Organic Analysis. New York, Elsevier, 1966.Google Scholar
  46. Geiger, W.B.: The mechanism of the antibacterial action of quinones and hydroquinones. Arch. Biochem. 11, 23–32 (1946).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Guldensteeden-Egeling, C.: Ueber Bildung von Cyanwasserstoffsaure bei einem Myriapoden. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 28, 576–579 (1882).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hall, F.R., Hollingworth, R.M., Shankland, D.L.: Cyanide tolerance in millipedes: comparison of respiration in millipedes and insects. Entomol. News 80, 277–282 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hall, F.R., Hollingworth, R.M., Shankland, D.L.: Cyanide tolerance in millipedes: the biochemical basis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 38B, 723–737 (1971).Google Scholar
  50. Halstead, B.W., Ryckman, R.: Injurious effects from contacts with millipedes. Med. Arts Sci. 3, 16–18 (1949).Google Scholar
  51. Haneveld, G.T.: Eye lesions caused by the exudate of tropical millipedes. I. Report on a case. Trop. geogr. Med. 10, 165–167 (1958).Google Scholar
  52. Hannum, C.A.: Anatomy of the millipede Chonaphe armatus. Publ. Puget Sound Biol. Sta. 5, 109–123 (1926).Google Scholar
  53. Hastings, J.W., Davenport, D.: The luminescence of the millipede, Luminodesmus sequoiae. Biol. Bull. 113, 120–128 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoffman, R.L.: Myriapoda, exclusive of insecta. In: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4 (Moore, R.C., ed.), pp. R572-R606. Boulder, Colo: Univ. of Kans. and Geol. Soc. Amer., 1969.Google Scholar
  55. Hoffman-Ostenhof, O.: Mechanism of the antibiotic action of certain quinones. Science 105, 549–550 (1947).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones, D.A., Parsons, J., Rothschild, M.: Release of hydrocyanic acid from crushed tissues of all stages in the life-cycle of species of the Zygaeninae (Lepidoptera). Nature (Lond.) 193, 52–53 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, T.H., Conner, W.E., Meinwald, J., Eisner, H.E., Eisner, T.: Benzoyl cyanide and mandelonitrile in the cyanogenetic secretion of a centipede. J. Chem. Ecol. 2, 421–429 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaestner, A.: Invertebrate Zoology. New York: Interscience Publ., 1968, Vol. II.Google Scholar
  59. Kafatos, F.C.: The chemical defense mechanisms of millipedes. Honors Thesis. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y. (1961).Google Scholar
  60. Kalmbach, E.R., Gabrielson, I.N.: Economic value of the starling in the United States. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 868, 1–66 (1921).Google Scholar
  61. Karrer, W.: Konstitution und Vorkommen der organischen Pflanzenstoffe, exkl. Alkaloide. Basel, Birkhauser 1958.Google Scholar
  62. Keegan, H.L.: Centipedes and millipedes as pests in tropical areas. In: Venomous and Poisonous Animals and Noxious Plants of the Pacific Region (Keegan, H.L. and MacFarlane, W.V., eds.), New York, Macmillan Co., 1963, pp. 161–163.Google Scholar
  63. Kempf, W.W., Brown, W.L., Jr.: Two new ants of Tribe Ectatommini from Colombia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud. entomol. 13, 311–320 (1970).Google Scholar
  64. Kinkel, H.: Zur Biologie und Okologie des getiipfelten Tausendfusses Blaniulus guttulatus Gerv. Z. angew. Entomol. 37, 401–436 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kirkland, A.H.: Usefulness of the American toad. U.S. Dept. Agr. Farmer’s Bull., 196 (1904).Google Scholar
  66. Kluge, A.F., Eisner, T.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. XXVIII. A quinone and a phenol in the defensive secretion of a parajulid milliped. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 64, 314–315 (1971).Google Scholar
  67. Kopstein, F.: Die Gifttiere Java’s und ihre Bedeutung für den Menschen. Med. v. d. Dienst. d. Volksgezondheid in Ned. Indie. 21, 222–256 (1932).Google Scholar
  68. Lawrence, R.F.: The Myriapoda of the Kruger National Park. Zool. afr. 2, 225–262 (1966).Google Scholar
  69. Leidy, J.: On the characters and intimate structure of the odoriferous glands of the Invertebrata. Proc. Philad. Acad. nat. Sci. 4, 234–236 (1849).Google Scholar
  70. Lister, M.: Extract of a letter from Dr. Martin Lister, Jan. 25, 1670-71, relating partly to the same argument with that of the former letter, and alluding to another insect likely to yield an acid liquor; and partly to the bleeding of the sycamore. Phil. Trans. 5, 556–558 (1670).Google Scholar
  71. Loomis, H.F.: Egg-laying habits and larval stages of a milliped Arctobolus marginatus (Say) Cook, native at Washington. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 23, 100–101 (1933).Google Scholar
  72. Loomis, H.F.: The millipeds of Hispaniola, with descriptions of a new family, new genera, and new species. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 80, 1–191 (1936).Google Scholar
  73. Loomis, H.F.: New genera and species of millipeds from the southern peninsula of Haiti. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 31, 188–195 (1941).Google Scholar
  74. McAtee, W.L.: Effectiveness in nature of the so-called protective adaptations in the animal kingdom, chiefly as illustrated by the food habits of nearctic birds. Smithsonian Inst. Misc. Coll. 85, 22 (1932).Google Scholar
  75. McFadden, W.H.: Techniques of Combined Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1973.Google Scholar
  76. Meinwald, J., Smolanoff, J., McPhail, A., Miller, R., Eisner, T. and Hicks, K.: Nitropolyzona-mine: a spirocyclic nitro compound from the defensive glands of a milliped (Polyzonium rosalbum). Tetrahedron Lett. no. 28, 2367–2370 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Meinwald, Y.C., Meinwald, J., Eisner, T.: 1,2-Dialkyl-4(3H)-quinazolinones in the defensive secretion of a millipede (Glomeris marginata). Science 154, 390–391 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Monro, A., Chadha, M., Meinwald, J., Eisner, T.: Defense mechanisms of arthropods. VI. Para-benzoquinones in the secretion of five species of millipedes. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 55, 261–262 (1962).Google Scholar
  79. Monteiro, H.: Constituents of the secretion of Orthomorpha coarctata Schubart. An. Ass. bras. Quim. 20, 29–31 (1961).Google Scholar
  80. Moore, B.P.: Hydrogen cyanide in the defensive secretions of larval Paropsini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 6, 36–38 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Moussatche, H., Lopez Cuadra, J., Ramos, P.R., Perisse, A.C.M.: Pharmacological experiments with benzoquinones. Rev. bras. Biol. 27, 369–379 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Moussatche, H., Lopez Cuadra, J., Ramos, P.R., Perisse, A.C.M., Salles, C.A., Loureiros, E.G.: Chemistry and pharmacology of the venomous secretion of Rhinocricus varians. Rev. bras. Biol. 29, 25–34 (1969).Google Scholar
  83. Nutting, W.L., Spangler, H.G.: The hastate setae of certain dermestid larvae: an entangling defense mechanism. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 62, 763–769 (1969).Google Scholar
  84. Pallares, E.S.: Note on the poison produced by the Polydesmus (Fontaria) vicinus, Lin. Arch. Biochem. 9, 105–108 (1946).Google Scholar
  85. Penteado, C.H.S., Mauge, G.D.: Tentativa de infestação do trato alimentar de cães pelo diplopode Rhinocricus padbergi, Verhoeff. Rev. bras. Pesquisas Med. Biol. 7, 29–35 (1974).Google Scholar
  86. Percy, J.E., Weatherston, J.: Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. V. Histological studies of the defence mechanism of Narceus annularis (Raf.) (Diplopoda: Spirobolida). Canad. J. Zool. 49, 278–279 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Perisse, A.C.M., Salles, C.A.: Estudo quimico de Diplopoda Brasileiros. III. Collostreptus fulvus (Schubart, 1960). Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro 13, 95–99 (1970).Google Scholar
  88. Perisse, A.C.M., Salles, C.A., Moussatche, H.: Estudo quimico de Diplopoda Braileiros II. Spirostrophus naresi (Pocock). Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro 12, 155–156 (1968).Google Scholar
  89. Phisalix, M.C.: Un venin volatil. Secretion cutanee du Julus terrestris. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 70, 1033–1036 (1900).Google Scholar
  90. Phisalix, M.C: Animaux Venimeux et Venins Vol. I. Paris, Masson, 1922.Google Scholar
  91. Plattner, H., Salpeter, M., Carrel, J.E., Eisner, T.: Struktur and Funktion des Drusenepithels der postabdominalen Tergite von Blatta orientalis. Z. Zellforsch. 125, 45–87 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Potter, V.R.: The inhibition of sulphydryl-containing enzymes by split products of p-dimethylaminobenzene. Cancer Res. 2, 688–693 (1942).Google Scholar
  93. Rajulu, G.S.: Occurrence of an antimicrobial substance in the excrement of egg-laying millipedes Cingalobolus bugnioni. Sci. and Cult. 35, 116 (1968).Google Scholar
  94. Rettenmeyer, C.W.: The behavior of millipedes found with neotropical army ants. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 35, 377–384 (1962).Google Scholar
  95. Rimsky-Korsakow, M.: Uber Polyzonium germanicum Brandt. Trav. Soc. imp. Nat. St. Peters-bourg 25, 21–28 (1895).Google Scholar
  96. Rivers, J.J.: Description of the form of the female in a lampyrid (Zarhipis riversi Horn). Amer. Naturalist 20, 648–650 (1886).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rossi, G.: Le glandole odorifere dell’ Julus communis. Z. wiss. Zool. 74, 64–80 (1903).Google Scholar
  98. Roth, L.M., Stay, B.: The occurrence of para-quinones in some arthropods, with emphasis on the quinone-secreting tracheal glands of Diploptera punctata (Blattaria). J. Insect Physiol. 1, 305–318 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sachtleben, H.: Untersuchungen über die Nahrung des Maulwurfs. Arb. biol. Reichsanstalt Land-u. Forstwirtschaft Berlin 14, 77–96 (1926).Google Scholar
  100. Savi, P.: Bemerkungen uber Julus communis. Isis 12 and 13, 214–222 (1823).Google Scholar
  101. Schildknecht, H., Krämer, H.: Zum Nachweis von Hydrochinonen neben Chinonen in den Abwehrblasen von Arthropoden. XV. Mitteilung iiber Insekten-Abwehrstoffe. Z. Naturforsch. 17b, 701–702 (1962).Google Scholar
  102. Schildknecht, H., Maschwitz, U., Krauss, D.: Blausaure im Wehrsekret des Erdlaufers Pachy-merium ferrugineum. Naturwissenschaften 55, 230 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schildknecht, H., Maschwitz, U., Wenneis, W.F.: Neue Stoffe aus dem Wehrsekret der Diplopodengattung Glomeris. über Arthropoden-Abwehrstoffe. XXIV. Naturwissenschaften 54, 196–197 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Schildknecht, H., Weis, K.H.: Chinone als aktives Prinzip der Abwehrstoffe von Diplopoden. Z. Naturforsch. 16b, 810–816 (1961).Google Scholar
  105. Schildknecht, H., Wenneis, W.F.: Uber Arthropoden-(Insekten) Abwehrstoffe. XX. Structur-aufklarung des Glomerins. Z. Naturforsch. 21b, 552–556 (1966).Google Scholar
  106. Schildknecht, H., Wenneis, W.F.: Uber Arthropoden-Abwehrstoffe. XXV. Anthranilsaure als Precursor der Arthropoden-Alkaloide Glomerin und Homoglomerin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 1815–1818 (1967).Google Scholar
  107. Schildknecht, H., Wenneis, W.F., Weis, K.H., Maschwitz, U.: Glomerin, ein neues Arthropoden-Alkaloid. Z. Naturforsch. 21b, 121–127 (1966).Google Scholar
  108. Schubart, O.: Diplopodos de Monte Alegre. Papeis Avulsos Departm. Zool. São Paulo 6, 283–320 (1945).Google Scholar
  109. Schubart, O.: Os Diplopoda da viagen do naturalista Antenor Leitão de Carvalho aos rios Araguaiae Amazonasem 1939 e 1940. Boll. Mus. Nac. Zool. Rio de Janeiro 82, 1–74 (1947).Google Scholar
  110. Schubart, O.: Ameisen und Diplopoden in ihren gegenseitigen Beziehungen Rev. Entomol. 21, 615–622 (1950).Google Scholar
  111. Shaw, G.G.: New observations on reproductive behavior in the milliped Narceus annularis (Raf.). Ecology 47, 322–323 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Silvestri, P.: Acari Myriapoda et Scorpiones: Classis Diplopoda. Vol. I. Portìcì, 1903.Google Scholar
  113. Smolanoff, J., Demange, J.M., Eisner, T., Meinwald, J.: 1,4-Benzoquinones in African millipedes. Psyche 82, 78–80 (1975b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Smolanoff, J., Kluge, A.F., Meinwald, J., McPhail, A., Miller, R.W., Hicks, K., Eisner, T.: Polyzonimine: a novel terpenoid insect repellent produced by a milliped. Science 188, 734–736 (1975a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Stebbins, R.C.: Lizards killed by a millipede. Amer. Midl. Natur. 32, 777–778 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Tapper, B.A., Zilg, H., Conn, E.E.: 2-Hydroxyaldoximes as possible precursors in the biosynthesis of cyanogenic glucosides. Phytochemistry 11, 1047–1053 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tiemann, D.L.: Observations on the natural history of the western banded glowworm Zarhipis integripennis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Phengodidae). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 35, 235–264 (1967).Google Scholar
  118. Towers, G.H.N., Duffey, S.S., Siegel, S.M.: Defensive secretion: biosynthesis of hydrogen cyanide and benzaldehyde from phenylalanine by a millipede. Canad. J. Zool. 50, 1047–1050 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Trave, R., Garanti, L., Pavan, M.: Ricerche sulla natura chimica del veleno del miriapode Archiulus (Schizophyllum) sabulosus L. Chim. et Ind. 41, 19–29 (1959).Google Scholar
  120. Verhoeff, K.W.: Klasse Diplopoda. In: Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs (Bronn, H.G. ed.), Vol. 5 Part II Section 1 (1-6). Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1928.Google Scholar
  121. Voges, E.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Juliden. Z. wiss. Zool. 31, 127–194 (1878).Google Scholar
  122. Weatherston, J., Gardiner, E.J.: The defensive secretion of a polydesmoid millipede (Diplopoda). Canad. Entomol. 105, 1375–1376 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Weatherston, J., Percy, J.E.: Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. III. Chemical, morphological, and histological studies of the defence mechanism of Uroblaniulus canadensis (Say) (Diplopoda: Julida). Canad. J. Zool. 47, 1389–1394 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Weatherston, J., Tyrrell, D., Percy, J.E.: Long-chain alcohol acetates in the defensive secretion of the millipede Blaniulus guttulatus. Chem. Phys. Lipids 7, 98–100 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Weber, M.: Ueber eine Cyanwasserstoffsäure bereitende Druse. Arch. mikr. Anat. 21, 468–475 (1882).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Weddell, G., Miller, S.: Cutaneous sensibility. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 24, 199–222 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wheeler, J.W., Meinwald, J., Hurst, J.J., Eisner, T.: Trans-2-dodecenal and 2-methyl-1,4-quinone produced by a millipede. Science 144, 540–541 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wheeler, W.M.: Hydrocyanic acid secreted by Polydesmus virginiensis, Drury. Psyche 5, 442 (1890).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wheeler, W.M., Mann, W.M.: The ants of Haiti. Bull. Amer. Mus. Natur. His. 33, 1–61 (1914).Google Scholar
  130. Whittaker, R.H., Feeny, P.P.: Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science 171, 757–770 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wood, H.C.: Description of new genera and species of North American Myriapoda. Proc. Philad. Acad. Nat. Sci. 16, 186–187 (1864).Google Scholar
  132. Wood, W.F.: Toluquinone and 2-methoxy-3-methylbenzoquinone from the defensive secretions of three African millipedes. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 67, 988–989 (1974).Google Scholar
  133. Wood, W.F., Shepherd, J., Chong, B., Meinwald, J.: Ubiquinone-O in the defensive secretion of an African millipede. Nature (Lond.) 253, 625–626 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Woodring, J.P., Blum, M.S.: The anatomy and physiology of the repugnatorial glands of Pachydesmus crassicutus. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 56, 448–453 (1963).Google Scholar
  135. Woodring, J.P., Blum, M.S.: The anatomy, physiology and comparative aspects of the repugnatorial glands of Orthocricus arboreus (Diplopoda: Spirobolida). J. Morph. 116, 99–108 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Eisner
  • D. Alsop
  • K. Hicks
  • J. Meinwald

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations