Skip to main content

Abstract

This topic is not only of deep-rooted theoretical interest; it also has a practical aspect. Research funds are dwindling rapidly throughout the world. The competition between the different fields of science will become stronger. Some fields will disappear completely. Departments will be closed. Under these circumstances, a fair comparison of the logical status of competing disciplines becomes crucial. If scientists are not willing to describe clearly the structure of and the relationship between the different fields, the future of science will be determined by prejudice and incidental experience of the members of legislatures, granting agencies, and governmental administrations. This implies a great risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stent, G. S.: Molecular biology and metaphysics. Nature (Lond.) 248, 779 (1974)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. for an excellent, conventional treatment of the problem I refer to Ruse, M.: The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchinson, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. and to Hull, D. L.: Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  4. Among the philosophers of science, Ernest Nagel has been a strong believer in the possibility of theory-reduction. See Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhn, T. S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feyerabend, P. K.: Explanation, reduction, and empiricism. In: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Feigl, H., Maxwell, G. (eds.). Minneapolis: Univ. Minnesota Press, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  7. Woodger, J. H.: Biology and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watson, J. D., Crick, F. H.: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature (Lond.) 171, 737 (1953)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacob, F., Monod, J.: Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 3, 318 (1961)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polanyi, M.: Life’s irreducible structure. Science 160, 1308 (1968)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hess, B.: Organization of glycolysis: Oscillatory and stationary control. In: Rate Control of Biological Processes. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol., Symp. XXVII. London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Estes, W. K.: Human behavior in mathematical perspective. Am. Scientist, 63, 649 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  13. quoted from Stent, G. S.: Molecular biology and metaphysics. Nature (Lond.) 248, 779 (1974)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. quoted from Jeuken, M.: The biological and philosophical definitions of life. Acta Biotheoretica 24, 14 (1975)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dombrowski, H. J.: Lebende Bakterien aus dem Paläozoicum. Biol. Z. 82, 477 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bohr, N.: Das Quantenpostulat und die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik. Naturwissenschaften 16, 245 (1928)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dewar, M. J. S.: Quantum organic chemistry. Science 187, 1037 (1975)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson, A. L.: Chemical dynamics: Accurate quantum calculations at last. Science 191, 275 (1976)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heisenberg, W.: Tradition in science. In: The Nature of Scientific Discovery. Gingerich, O. (ed.). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Inst. Press, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lauffer, M. A.: Entropy-driven Processes in Biology: Polymerization of Tobacco Mosaic Virus Protein and Similar Reactions. New York: Springer, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eigen, M.: Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58, 465 (1971)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rychlak, J. F.: A Philosophy of Science for Personality Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mohr, H. (1977). Physics and Biology: The Problem of Reduction. In: Lectures on Structure and Significance of Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45496-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45496-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45498-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45496-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics