Skip to main content

MCDM Bibliography — 1975

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 123))

Abstract

Only the published works directly related to Multiple Criteria Decision Making are included. Intentionally excluded are the works dealing with multidimensional scaling and conjoint measurement, multiple cues modeling of human judgment, multiattribute attitude models of consumer behavior, statistical decision theory, and similar areas deserving bibliographies of their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refereces

  • Alessio, J.F., “Multiple Criteria in Environmental Control: Use of Economic Maximization Rules to Determine Relative Standards,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 544–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aonuma, T., “An Algorithm for Multi-Objective Programs-An Application of Generalized Linear Programming,” (In Japanese), in Proceedings of Kobe College of Commerce, 18, No. 2, 1966, 120–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., E.W. Barankin and D. Blackwell, “Admissible Points of Convex Sets,” in H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, eds., Contributions to the Theory of Games, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1953, 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimus, H.D., “De l’optimisation à l’analyse multicritère: Le Modèle de Média Planning automatisé: MOÏSE,” METRA, 9, No. 4, 1970, 531–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athans, M. and H.P. Geering, “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Differentiable Nonscalar-Valued Functions to Attain Extrema,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-18, No. 2, 1973, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J-P., “A Pareto Minimum Principle,” in H.W. Kuhn and G.P. Szegö, eds., Differential Games and Related Topics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971, 147–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J-P., “Selection de Solutions d’un Problème d’Optimisation a Critères Multiples,” Cahiers de Mathématiques de la Décision, No. 714, December, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J-P., Closest Efficient Decisions to the Shadow Minimum of a Multiobjective Problem, Working Paper 72-6, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J-P., “Multi-Games and Decentralization in Management,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J-P. and B. Näslund, “An Exterior Branching Algorithm,” Working Paper 72-42, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderston, F.E., “Optimal and Feasible Choice in Organizations Having Multiple Goals,” Working Paper No. 12, Management Science News, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, Berkeley, California, February 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bammi, D. and D. Bammi, “Land Use Planning: An Optimizing Model,” OMEGA, 3, No. 5, 1975, 583–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J.H., Individual Goals and Organizational Objectives, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, H.G., “Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Zielpolyedern,” Diskussionsschriften der Universität Heidelberg, Fachgruppe Wirtschaftswissenschaften, No. 44, Heidelberg, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. and R.C. Carlson, “Multi-Goal Optimization in Managerial Science,” OMEGA, 2, No. 5, October 1974, 607–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, T., T.R. Burns, P. DeVille, and L.D. Meeker, “A Systems Model of Conflict and Change in Planning Systems with Multi-Level, Multiple-Objective Evaluation and Decision-Making,” in A. Rapoport, ed., General Systems Yearbook, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, R.M. and W.S. Meisel, “The Optimization of Complex Systems with Respect to Multiple Criteria,” in Proceedings of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference: Joint National Conference on Major Systems, October 1971, 144-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenson, S.M. and K.C. Kapur, “An Algorithm for Solving Multicriterion Linear Programming Problems with Examples,” Operational Research Quarterly, 24, No. 1, March 1973, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R.E. and L.A. Zadeh, “Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment,” Management Science, 17, No. 4, 1970, B141–B164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., O.I. Larichev, J. de Montgolfier, and J. Tergny, “Procédures Systematiques de Programmation Linéaire Multi-Objectifs,” SEMA, METRA International, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 117, May, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., O.I. Larichev, J. de Montgolfier and J. Tergny, “Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions. The Method of Constraints,” Automation and Remote Control, 32, No. 8, 1971, 1257–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny and O.I. Larichev, “Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: STEP Method (STEM),” Mathematical Programming, 1, No. 3, 1971, 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., B. Roy and B. Sussmann, “ÉECTRE: une méthode pour guider le choix en presence de points de vue multiples,” SEMA, METRA International, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail No. 49, June 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R. and J. Tergny, “Critères Multiples en programmation mathématique: une solution dans le cas linéaire,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, 3, No. 5-2, 1969, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., J. Tergny and D. Keuneman, “Mathematical Programming with Multi-Objective Functions: A Solution by P.O.P. (Progressive Orientation Procedure),” METRA, 9, No. 2, 1970, 279–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., J. de Montgolfier, J. Tergny, and O.I. Larichev, “Programmation Linéaire avec Fonctions Economiques Multiples: Méthode STEM,” SEMA, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, no. 188, May, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstresser, K., A. Charnes and P.L. Yu, “Generalization of Domination Structures and Nondominated Solutions in Multicriteria Decision Making”, Center for Cybernetic Studies, CCS 185, University of Texas, Austin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstresser, K. and P.L. Yu, “Domination Structures and Multicriteria Problems in N-Person Games,” Center for Cybernetic Studies, CCS 234, University of Texas, Austin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berhold, M., “Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Consumer Behavior,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 570–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, G. and M.L. Besson, “Douze méthodes d’ analyse multicritère,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, 5, No. 5-3, 1971, 19–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J.S. and W.G. Mellon, “Multi-Dimensional Considerations in the Evaluation of Urban Policy,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 530–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertier, P. and J. de Montgolfier, “On Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to a Forest Management Problem,” METRA, 13, No. 1, March 1974, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidlingmaier, J., “Unternehmerische Zielkonflikte and Ansätze zu ihrer Lösung,” Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 38, No. 3, 1968, 149–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, J.W., “Empirical Evidence Regarding Business Goals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 613–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, J.S. and J.S. Ford, “The Quantity/Quality Dilemma: The Impact of a Zero Defects Program,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 517–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, D., “An Analog of the Minimax Theorem for Vector Payoffs,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 6, No. 1, 1956, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, J-M., “A General Formulation of the Multiattribute Decision Problem: Concepts and Solution Algorithms,” Working Paper 101-72, Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, J-M., “The General Concept of Multidimensional Consistency: Some Algebraic Aspects of the Aggregation Problem,” In J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bod, P., “Lineare Optimierung mittels simultan gegebener Zielfunktionen,” In A Prékopa, ed., Colloquium on Applications of Mathematics to Economics, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1965, 55-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bod, P., “Lineáris programozas több, egyidejüleg adott célfüggvény szerint”, Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Series B, 8, No. 4, 1963, 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bod, P., “On the Indifferent Programming Problems,” Szigma, 5, No. 2, 1972, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boychuk, L.M. and V.O. Ovchinnikov, “Principal Methods for Solution of Multicriteria Optimization Problems (Survey),” Soviet Automatic Control, 6, No. 3, 1973, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldur, G., “Metode Pentru Rezolvarea Problemelor Decizlonale Complexe,” Studii şi Cercetări de Calcul Economic şi Cibernetică Economică, No. 6. Bucareşti, 1969, 47-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldur, G., Procese informaţionale şi de decizie in economie, Editura Ştiinţificţ, Bucureşti, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldur, G. and I.M. Stancu-Minasian, “Méthodes de Résolution de Certains Problèmes de Programmation Linéaire Multidimensionnelle,” Revue Roumaine de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 16, No. 3, 1971, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldur, G. and I.M. Stancu-Minasian, “Programarea Linlară cu mai Multe Funcţii Obiectiv,” Studii şi Cercetări Matematice, 24, No. 8, 1972, 1169–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldur, G., Fundamentarea Complexă a procesului decizional economic, Editura Ştiiţifică, Bucureşti, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A.L. and J.F. Hair, Jr., “Optimal Decisions on Multiple Objectives Through Canonical Analysis,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 729–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briskin, L.E., “A Method of Unifying Multiple Objective Functions,” Management Science, 12, No. 10, 1966, B406–B416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskin, L.E., “Establishing a Generalized Multi-Attribute Utility Function,” In J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brucker, P., “Discrete Parameter Optimisation Problem and Essential Efficient Points,” Zeitschrift für Operations Research, 16, No. 5, 1972, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffet, P., J.P. Grémy, M. Marc and B. Sussmann, “Peut-on choisir en tenant compte de critères multiples? Une méthode (ÉLECTRE) et trois applications,” METRA, 6, No. 2, 1967, 283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and L.D. Meeker, “A Mathematical Model of Multi-Dimensional Evaluation, Decision-Making and Social Interaction,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C. 1973, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyanov, B.B. and V.M. Ozernoi, “Decision Method Using Vector Criterion,” Engineering Cybernetics, 12, No. 3, 1974, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J.R., “An Introduction to Financial Planning Through Goal Programming,” Cost and Management, 47, No. 1, January–February 1973, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candler, W., “Linear Programming in Capital Budgeting with Multiple Goals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia S.C., 1973, 416–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candler, W. and M. Boehlje, “Use of Linear Programming in Capital Budgeting with Multiple Goals,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, No. 2, 1971, 325–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantley, M.F., “The Choice of Corporate Objectives,” Long Range Planning, 3, No. 1, 1970, 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplin, D. and J.S.H. Kornbluth, “Multiobjective Investment Planning Under Uncertainty,” OMEGA, 3, No. 4, 1975, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.S.L., “General Theory of Optimal Processes,” SIAM Journal of Control, 4, No. 1, 1966, 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., R.W. Clower and K.O. Kortanek, “Effective Control Through Coherent Decentralization with Pre-emptive Goals,” Econometrica, 35, No. 2, 1967, 294–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing Under Chance Constraints,” Operations Research, 11, No. 1, 1963, 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Management Models and Industrial Application of Linear Programming,” Management Science, 4, No. 1, 1957, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1961, 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Some Network Characterizations for Mathematical Programming and Accounting Approaches to Planning and Control,” The Accounting Review, 42, No. 1, 1967, 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Constrained Extremization Models and Their Use in Developing System Measures,” in M.D. Mesarović, ed., Views on General System Theory, Wiley, New York, 1964, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Elements of a Strategy for Making Models in LP,” in R.E. Machol, W.P. Tanner and S.N. Alexander, eds., System Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965, Chapter 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Systems Evaluation and Repricing Theorems,” Management Science, 9, No. 1, 1962, 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and R.J. Niehaus, “Dynamic Multiattribute Models for Mixed Manpower Systems,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 22, No. 2, 1975, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, J.K. DeVoe, D.B. Learner and W. Reinecke, “A Goal Programming Model for Media Planning,” Management Science, 14, No. 8, 1968, B423–B430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and Y. Ijiri, “Breakeven Budgeting and Programming to Goals,” Journal of Accounting Research, 1, No. 1, 1963, 16–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, R.J. Niehaus and A. Stedry, “Static and Dynamic Assignment Models with Multiple Objectives and Some Remarks on Organization Design,” Management Science, 15, No. 8, 1969, B365–B376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and A. Stedry, “Search-Theoretic Models of Organization Control by Budgeted Multiple Goals,” Management Science, 12, No. 5, 1966, 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. et al., “An Extended Goal Programming Model for Manpower Planning,” Management Science Research Paper, No. 188, Carnegie-Mellon University, June 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, R.J. Niehaus and D. Sholtz, “An Algorithm for Multi-Attribute Assignment Models and Spectral Analyses for Dynamic Organization Design,” Research Report CCS-78, Center for Cybernetic Studies, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, K.A. Lewis and R.J. Niehaus, “A Multi-Objective Model for Planning Equal Employment Opportunities,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 110–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Goal Programming and Constrained Regression —A Comment,” OMEGA, 3, No. 4, 1975, 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau, J.P., “Towards a Multiple Criteria Approach to the Capital Budgeting Proglem of Multinational Corporations,” Working Paper, University of Montreal, Montreal, June 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, R., “Linear Programming with Vector-Valued Cost Function,” Technical Report, 70-3, The Aloha System, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, R., “Well Posed Linear Programs with Vector-Valued Cost Functions,” Technical Report, Part 1, 70-4, The Aloha System, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, R., “Well Posed Linear Programs with Vector-Valued Cost Functions,” Technical Report, Part 2, 70-5, The Aloha System, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, K.C., “On the Noninferior Set for the Systems with Vector-Valued Objective Function,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-15, No. 5, 1970, 591–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W., “Morality as a Value Criterion,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chyung, D.H., “Optimal Systems with Multiple Cost Functionals,” SIAM Journal of Control, 5, No. 3, 1967, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J.L. and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J.L. and D.H. Marks, “Multiobjective Screening Models and Water Resources Investment,” Water Resources Research, 9, No. 4, August 1973, 826–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J.L. and D.H. Marks, “A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Programming Techniques,” Water Resources Research, 11, No. 7, April 1975, 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J.L., “Applications of Multiple Objectives to Water Resources Problems,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, 1975, 252-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.C., W.S. Meisel and M.D. Teener, “Multi-Objective Evaluation of a Traffic Restriction Policy for Air Pollution Episode Control,” Technology Service Corporation Report, TSC-030, Santa Monica, California, November 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.C., W.S. Meisel and A. Jain, “A Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Alternative Nursing Resource Allocation Algorithms,” Technology Service Corporation Report, TSC-40, Santa Monica, California, July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.C., W.S. Meisel and H.J. Payne, “Multi-Objective Control Theory,” Technology Service Corporation, TSC-PD-106-1, Santa Monica, California, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D.C., “Applications of Multiple Criteria Evaluation to Decision Aiding,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 477–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B., “A Stochastic Approach to Goal Programming,” Operations Research, 16, No. 3, 1968, 576–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B. and S. Zionts, “Restricted Bargaining for Organizations with Multiple Objectives,” Econometrica, 36, No. 2, 1968, 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini, B.M., “A Decision Model Under Uncertainty with Multiple Payoffs,” in A. Mensch, ed., Theory of Games; Techniques and Applications, Elsevier, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, J.F., T.D. Klastorin and T.W. Ruefli, “A Goal Programming Approach to Urban-Suburban Location Preferences,” Management Science, 18, No. 6, 1972, B258–B268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A.B., “Impact Analysis using Differentially Weighted Evaluative Criteria,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 732–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, B.W., and P.R. Kleindorfer, “Coordinating Multi-Project Networks,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C, 1973, 668–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha, N.O. and E. Polak, “Constrained Minimization under Vector-Valued Criteria in Finite Dimensional Spaces,” ERL-188, Electronic Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha, N.O. and E. Polak, “Constrained Minimization Under Vector-Valued Criteria in Finite Dimensional Spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 19, No. 1, 1967, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha, N.O. and E. Polak, “Constrained Minimization Under Vector-Valued Criteria in Linear Topological Spaces,” in A.V. Balakrishnan and L.W. Neustadt, eds., Mathematical Theory of Control, Academic Press, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N.C., “Group Decision Analysis,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 44–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilina, G.P. and V.S. Bovel, “A Certain Nonlinear Model with Several Specific Functions,” (In Russian), Vestnik Akademii Nauk Kazah., 25, No. 2, 1969, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, P.C. and R.R. Sharma, “On Optimal Controls with Vector-Valued Cost Functional,” Revue Roumaine de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 16, No. 3, 1971, 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R.H. and S.M. Robinson, “Economic Decisions with L** Utility,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia S.C., 1973, 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M., “Objective Optimization under Multiple Subjective Functions,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, 1973, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. and B. Corrigan, “Linear Models in Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin, 81, No. 2, 1974, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. and J. Eagle, “Multivariate Selection of Students in a Racist Society: A Systematically Unfair Approach,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neufville, R. and R.L. Keeney, “Use of Decision Analysis in Airport Development for Mexico City,” in A.W. Drake, R.L. Keeney and P.M. Morse, eds., Analysis of Public Systems, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1972, Chapter 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neufville, R. and R.L. Keeney, “Multiattribute Preference Analysis for Transportation Systems Evaluation,” Transportation Research, 7, March 1973, 63-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Roccaferrera, G.M.F., “Behavioral Aspect of Decision Making under Multiple Goals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C, 1973, 635–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., “Die Maximierung eines Quotienten zweier linearer Funktionen unter linearen Nebenbedingungen,” Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie and verwandte Gebiete, 1, No. 2, 1962, 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., “Entscheidungen bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung and die Problematik der Zielwichtung,” in W. Busse von Colbe and P. Meyer-Dohm, eds., Unternehmerishche Planung und Entscheidung, Bertelsmann, Bielefeld, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., Sensitivitätsanalysen und Parametrische Programmierung, Chapter 6, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., “Über einen Lösungsansatz zum Vektormaximumproblem,” in M. Beckman and H.P. Künzi, eds., Unternehmensforschung-Heute, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., “Unternehmerische Entscheidungen bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung,” Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 32, No. 12, 1962, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W., “Zur Frage Unternehmerischer Zielsetzungen bei Entsheidungen unter Risiko,” Universität Regensburg Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Serie A., No. 1, April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W. and W. Dürr, “Effizienzaussagen bei Ersatzprogrammen zum Vektormaximumproblem,” in H.P. Künzi and H. Schubert, eds., Operations Research Verfahren, 12, Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim, 1972, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelbach, W. and H. Isermann, “On Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria and Under Incomplete Information,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drăguşin, C., “Asupra Optimizarii Pareto,” Studii şi Cercetări Matematice, 26, No. 10, 1974, 1293–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubov, Y.A., and B.L. Shmulyan, “Improvement of the Solution of Discrete Multicriterion Problem,” Automation and Remote Control, 34, No. 12, December 1973, 1953–1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürr, W., “Einige Theoreme zum Vektormaximumproblem,” Regensburger Disskussionbeiträge zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Serie B., No. 1, Regensburg, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., “Interactive Goal Programming,” Management Science, 19, No. 1, 1972, 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., “A Time-Sharing Computer Program for the Solution of the Multiple Criteria Problem,” Management Science, 19, No. 12, August, 1973, 1379–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., “An Empirical Investigation of a Man-Machine Interactive Approach to the Solution of the Multiple Criteria Problem,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., “A Procedure for Selecting Educational Goal Areas for Emphasis,” Operations Research, 21, No. 3, May–June, 1973, 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., W. Farrell and P. Bradley, “Utility Functions for Test Performance,” Management Science, 20, No. 4, December 1973, 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S., “The Effects of Errors in the Estimation of the Gradient on the Frank-Wolfe Algorithm with Implications for Interactive Programming,” Operations Research, 22, No. 1, January 1974, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S. and R.F. Miles, Jr., “Trajectory Selection for the Mariner Jupiter/Saturn 1977 Project,” Technical Memorandum 33-706, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, October 15, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, A., “One-of-a-Kind Decisions Involving Weighted Multiple Objectives and Disparate Alternatives,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 657–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, A., Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, John Wiley, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckenrode, R.T., “Weighting Multiple Criteria,” Management Science, 12, No. 3, 1965, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, J.G. and I.A. Kouada, “Finding Efficient Points for Linear Multiple Objective Programs,” Mathematical Programming, 8, No. 3, 1975, 375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilon, S., “Goals and Constraints in Decision Making,” Operational Research Quarterly, 23, No. 1, 1972, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H.M. and R.L. Keeney, “A Rational Approach for Government Decisions Concerning Air Pollution,” in A.W. Drake, R.L. Keeney and P.M. Morse, eds., Analysis of Public Systems, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1972, Chapter 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emeljanov, S.V., V.I. Borisov, A.A. Malevic and A.M. Cercasin, “Models and Methods of Vector Optimization,” Engineering Cybernetics, 11, No. 5, 1973, 386–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.P. and R.E. Steuer, “A Revised Simplex Method for Linear Multiple Objective Programs,” Mathematical Programming, 5, No. 1, 1973, 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.P., and R.E. Steuer, “Generating Efficient Extreme Points in Linear Multiple Objective Programming: Two Algorithms and Computing Experience,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G., Optimale Entscheidung bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G., “A Multiple-Objective Programming Algorithm for the Distribution of Resources among Teaching and Research,” Working Paper, Institut für Gesselschafts-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bonn, Bonn, August 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G. and J. Wilhelm, “Zur Entscheidungstheorie bei Mehrfacher Zielsetzung,” Working Paper, Institut für Gesselschafts-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universität Bonn, Bonn, November 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G. and W. Jochen, “Das Vektormaximumproblem bei Sicherheit und Unsicherheit,” Working Paper, Institut für Gesselschafts-und Wirtschaftswisenschaften der Universität Bonn, Bonn, January 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G., “Lösungsprinzipien and Lösungsalgorithmen zum Vektormaximum-problem bei Sicherzeit und Unsicherzeit,” Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 45, No. 6, 1975, 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P.H., “Fractional Hypercube Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions,” Technical Report No. 222, Dept. of Operations Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., August, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P.H., “A Fractional Hypercube Decomposition Theorem for Multiattribute Utility Functions,” Operations Research, 23, No. 5, September–October, 1975, 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, P.H., “Pyramid and Semicube Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions,” P-5323, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California, November, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, A., “An Experimental Investigation of an Interactive Approach for Multicriterion Optimization with an Application to Academic Resource Allocation,” Working Paper No. 186, Western Management Science Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, March 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.E., “The Theory of Multidimensional Utility Analysis in Relation to Multiple Goal Business Behavior: A Synthesis,” Southern Economic Journal, 32, No. 2, 1965, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C.E. and R. Blair, “Inferior Factors, Externalities and Pareto Optimality,” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 11, No. 3, Autumn, 1971, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, T.D.H., M.L. Podrebarac and S.S. Sengupta, “Probabilities of Optima in Multiobjective Linear Programmes,” Working Paper No. 63, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firstman, S.I. and D.S. Stoller, “Establishing Objectives, Measures and Criteria for Multi-Phase Complementary Activities,” Operations Research, 14, No. 1, 1966, 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.W., “Four Methods for Assessing Multi-Attribute Utilities: An Experimental Validation,” Technical Report No. 037230-6-T, Engineering Psychology Laboratory, University of Michigan, September, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Additive Representation of Real-Valued Functions on Subsets of Product Sets,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 1971, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Applications to Priorities and Assignments,” Operations Research, 15, No. 3, 1967, 537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Additivity in Utility Theory with Denumerable Product Sets,” Econometrica, 34, No. 2, 1966, 500–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets,” Operations Research, 13, No. 1, 1965, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Methods of Estimating Additive Utilities,” Management Science, 13, No. 7, 1967, 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Utility Theory,” Management Science, 14, No. 5, 1968, 335–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Bernoullian Utilities for Multiple-Factor Situations,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Lexicographic Orders, Utilities, and Decision Rules: A Survey,” Management Science, 20, No. 11, July 1974, 1442–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Noncompensatory Preferences,” Report TR-11, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. and R.L. Keeney, “Generalized Utility Independence and some Implications,” Operations Research, 23, No. 5, September–October, 1975, 928–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., “Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Functions on Two Attributes,” Operations Research, 22, No. 1, 1974, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. and R.L. Keeney, “Seven Independence Concepts and Continuous Multiattribute Utility Functions,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 11, 1974, 294–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiszel, H., “Uwzglednienie w rachunku optymalizacji wiecej niz jednej funkcjikryterium,” Przeglad Statystyczny, 11, No. 4, 1964, 401–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focke, J., “Vektormaximumprobleme und Parametrische Optimierung,” Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik, 4, No. 5, 1973, 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, J.D., “Utilization of Goal Programming in Production and Capital Expenditure Planning,” CORS Journal, 7, No. 2, 1969, 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, J.D. and D.J. Laughhunn, “Capital Rationing in the Face of Multiple Organizational Objectives,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourgeaud, C., Lenclud and P. Sentis, “Critère de choix en avenir partiellement certain,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, 2, No. 14, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D.G., “Multiple Objectives in Bayesian Analysis. An Applied Case,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 736–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, H.T. and Y.Y. Haimes, “The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method in Dynamic Multiple Objective Problems,” Systems Research Center, Tech. Memo 52, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A.M. III and R.H. Haveman, “Benefit-Cost Analysis and Multiple Objectives: Current Issues in Water Resources Planning”, Water Resources Research, 6, No. 6, 1970, 1533–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frehel, J., “Problèmes Multicritères. Théorie de la Domination de Yu et Efficacité de Pareto,” METRA, 13, No. 1, March, 1974, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freimer, M. and P.L. Yu, “The Application of Compromise Solutions to Reporting Games,” Systems Analysis Program Series, No. F 7220, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freimer, M. and P.L. Yu, “An Approach Toward Decision Problems with Multiobjectives,” Center for Systems Science, 72-03, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freimer, M. and P.L. Yu, “Some New Results on Compromise Solutions for Group Decisions Problems,” Systems Analysis Program, F-7221, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freimer, M. and P.L. Yu, “The Application of Compromise Solutions to Reporting Games,” in A. Rapoport, ed., Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland, 1974, 235–260.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gaft, M.G. and V.M. Ozernoi, “Isolation of a Set of Noninferior Solutions and their Estimates in Decision-Making Problems with a Vector-Valued Criterion,” Automation and Remote Control, 34, No. 11, 1973, 1787–1795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, T., “A Note on Interactive Multicriteria Programming,” Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der RWTH Aachen, No. 75/13, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearing, C.E. and B.H. Adams, “Determining an Optimal Set of Research Experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-21, No. 1, February 1974, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geering, H.P. and M. Athans, “The Infimum Principle,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, No. 5, 1974, 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., “A Parametric Programming Solution to the Vector Maximum Problem, with Applications to Decisions Under Uncertainty,” Technical Report No. 11, Operations Research Programs, Stanford University, February 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., “Proper Efficiency and the Theory of Vector Maximization,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 22, 1968, 618–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., “Solving Bicriterion Mathematical Programs,” Operations Research, 15, No. 1, 1967, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., “Vector Maximal Decomposition Programming,” Working Paper No. 164, Western Management Science Institute, University of California at Los Angeles, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., J.S. Dyer and A. Feinberg, “An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department,” Management Science, 19, No. 4, 1972, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M. and W.W. Hogan, “Coordination of Two-Level Organizations with Multiple Objectives,” in A.V. Balakrishnan, ed., Proceedings of the Fourth IFIP Colloquium on Optimization Techniques, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, T.E., “Goal Programming,” Journal of Systems Management, 24, No. 5, May, 1973, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, J.C., “A Generalization of a Result in Linear Programming,” Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, 1967, 193-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, X., “Méthodologie de l’analyse multicritère appliquée aux transports urbains,” Rapport de recherche, No. 9, IRT, décembre, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D.A., “A Goal Programming Approach to Aggregate Planning of Production and Work Force,” Management Science, 20, No. 12, August, 1974, 1569–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorokhovik, V.V., “On the Problem of Vector Optimization,” Engineering Cybernetics, 10, No. 6, 1972, 995–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and Y. Wind, Multiattribute Decisions in Marketing: A Measurement Approach, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., “Multidimensional Scaling and Conjoint Measurement in the Study of Choice among Multiattribute Alternatives,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 577–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolleau, J.L. and J. Tergny, “Manuel de référence du programme ÉLECTRE II (Méthode de classement ÉLECTRE II en présence de critères multiples),” Groupe METRA, Direction Scientifique, Document Technique No. 24, December 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbström, R.W., Market Cybernetic Processes, Almquist & Wiksell Förlang AB, Stockholm, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guigou, J.L., Analyse des données et choix à critères multiples, Dunod, Paris, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, L.S., “Some Aspects of Vectorial Optimisation,” (In Russian), Avtomatika i Vychislitelnaya Tekhnika, No. 4, 1974, 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y., L.S. Lasdon and D.A. Wismer, “On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-1, No. 3, 1971, 296–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y. and H.T. Freedman, “The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method in Static Multiple Objective Problems,” Systems Research Center, Tech. Memo 53, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y. and W.A. Hall, “Multiobjectives in Water Resources Systems Analysis: The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method,” Water Resources Research, 10, No. 4, 1974, 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y., W.A. Hall, and H.T. Freedman, Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources Systems, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y.Y., “Integrated System Identification and Optimization,” in C.T. Leondes, ed., Advances in Control Systems Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1973, 435–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W.A. and Y.Y. Haimes, “The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method with Multiple Decision-Makers,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 206–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K.R., “Externalizing the Parameters of Quasirational Thought,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 74–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanieski, F.J., “Technological Change as the Optimization of a Multidimensional Product,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 550–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnett, R.M. and J.P. Ignizio, “A Heuristic Program for the Covering Problem with Multiple Objectives,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 738–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatry, H.P., “Measuring the Effectiveness of Non-Defense Public Programs,” Operations Research, 18, No. 5, 1970, 772–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haurie, A., “On Pareto Optimal Decisions for a Coalition of a Subset of Players,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-18, No. 2, 1973, 144–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C.A., and R.A. Adams, “A Goal Programming Model for Capital Budgeting,” Financial Management, 3, No. 1, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hax, H., “Bewertungsprobleme bei der Formulierung von Zielfunktionen für Entscheidungsmodelle,” Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 19, 1967, 749–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, G.G. and A.C. Stedry, “The Elementary Redundancy-Optimization Problem: A Case Study in Probabilistic Multiple Goal Programming,” Operations Research, 22, No. 3, May-June, 1974, 610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., “Goals-Achievement Matrix for Evaluating Alternative Plans,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34, No. 1, 1968, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, T.J., “QC Optimization through Goal Programming,” Quality Progress, 6, No. 12, 1973, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, C.J., “On the Choice of Objectives in Systems Studies,” in D.P. Eckman, ed., Systems, Research and Design, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, C., “Sub-Optimization in Operations Research,” Operations Research, 1, No. 3, 1953, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoag, W.M., “The Relevance of Cost in Operations Research,” Operations Research, No. 4, 1956, 448–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D.S.P., J-C. Larréché and W.F. Massy, “Multiattribute Preference Functions of University Administrators,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, 1975, 284-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.C., “Note on the Mean-Square Strategy of Vector Values Objective Function,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 9, No. 5, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P., “Methods for Quantifying Subjective Probabilities and Multi-attribute Utilities,” Decision Sciences, 5, 1974, 430–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P., “Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies,” Management Science, 20, No. 10, June 1974, 1393–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A.R. and P.C. Humphreys, “An Investigation of Subjective Preference Orderings for Multiattributed Alternatives,” in D. Wendt and C. Vlek, eds., Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyenne, J. and J. Moscarola, “Méthode Trichotomique de Choix Multicritères,” Mémoire 3, Cycle Science des Organisations, Université Paris-Dauphine, July, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y., Management Goals and Accounting for Control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y., “A Historical Cost Approach to Aggregation of Multiple Goals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isermann, H., “Proper Efficiency and the Linear Vector Maximum Problem” Operations Research, 22, No. 1, January–February, 1974, 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isermann H., “Lösungsansätze zum Entscheidungsproblem des Satisfizierers bei mehrfacher Zielsetzung,” in P. Gessner, R. Henn, V. Steinecke and H. Todt, eds., Proceedings in Operations Research 3, Physica Verlag, Würzburg, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen, V., “A Goal Programming Model of Aggregate Production Planning,” Swedish Journal of Economics, 71, No. 1, March 1969, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jääskeläinen, V., “Strategic Planning with Goal Programming,” Management Informatics, 1, No. 1, February, 1972, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze, E., “How We Can Use the Notion of Semiorders to Build Outranking Relations in Multicriteria Decision Making,” METRA, 13, No. 1, March, 1974, 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaikumar, R., “A Heuristic 0–1 Algorithm with Multiple Objectives and Constraints,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 745–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasilionis, R.J. and P.E. Rybakovaite, “The Connection between the Vector Minimising Problem and Convex Programming Problem” (in Russian), Litovskii Matematicheskii Sbornik, 10, 1970, 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, E., Studies in Multiobjective Decision Models, Studentlitteratur, Lund, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, E., “Experiences in Multiobjective Management Processes,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, 1975, 134-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joksch H. C., “Mathematical Aspects of a Multi-Objective Optimizing Model Proposed by Leininger et al.,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 3, No. 3, 1971, 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joksch H. C., “Constraints, Objectives, Efficient Solutions and Suboptimization in Mathematical Programming,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 122, No. 1, 1966, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttler H., “Linejnaja model s neskolkimi celovimi funkcijami” (in Russian), Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, 3, No. 3, 1967, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantariya G. V., “Optimal Choice of Strategy Based on Compromise Agreement among Alternative Selection Criteria,” Engineering Cybernetics, 12, No. 1, 1974, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan M and S. Schwartz, Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and Mathematical Approaches, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur K. C., “Mathematical Methods of Optimization for Multi-Objective Transportation Systems,” Socio-Economic Planning Science, 4, No. 4, 1970, 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S. Mathematical Methods and Theory in Games, Programming and Economics, Vol. 1, Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass., 1959, 216–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpelevich, F.I. and V.A. Mukhina, “On One Method for Solving Multi-Objective Linear Programming Problems,” (In Russian), Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 7, 1975, 153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpelevich, F.I. and V.A. Mukhina, “On Some Solution Methods of Multiobjective Problems,” (In Russian), Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, 11, No. 2, 1975, 399–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Multiplicative Utility Functions,” Technical Report No. 70, Operations Research Center, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts, March 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Quasi-Separable Utility Functions,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 15, No. 4, 1968, 551–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Evaluating Multidimensional Situations Using a Quasi-Separable Utility Function,” IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, MMS-9, 1968, 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “An Illustrated Procedure for Assessing Multiattributed Utility Functions,” Sloan Management Review, 14, No. 1, 1972, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Multidimensional Utility Functions: Theory Assessment and Application,” Technical Report No. 43, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Utility Functions for Multi-Attributed Consequences,” Management Science, 18, No. 4, 1972, 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Utility Independence and Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences,” Operations Research, 19, No. 4, 1971, 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Risk, Independence and Multiattributed Utility Functions,” Econometrica, 41, No. 1, January, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and C.W. Kirkwood, “Group Decision Making Using Cardinal Social Welfare Functions,” Technical Report No. 83, Operations Research Center, M.I.T., October, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Concepts of Independence in Multiattribute Utility Theory,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “A Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives: the Mexico City Airport,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, No. 1, 1973, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “Multiplicative Utility Functions,” Operations Research, 22, No. 1, 1974, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., “A Utility Analysis for Response Times of Engines and Ladders to Fires,” Urban Analysis, 1, 1973, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and A. Sicherman, “An Interactive Computer Program for Assessing and Analyzing Preferences concerning Multiple Objectives,” IIASA Research Memorandum, RM-75-12, Laxenburg, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killough, L. and T. Sanders, “A Goal Programming Model for Public Accounting Firms,” The Accounting Review, 48, 1973, 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, C. G., “Parametrically Dependent Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Col., November, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr C. N., “Multiple Objectives in Mathematical Programming,” Operations Research, 6, No. 6, 1958, 849–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr D., “Decision Making in a Complex Environment: The Use of Similarity Judgments to Predict Preferences,” Management Scxence, 15, No. 11, 1969, 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger A “Improper Solutions of the Vector Maximum Problem,” Operations Research, 15, No. 3, 1967, 570–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger A., “Vector-Valued Performance Criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-9, No. 1, 1964, 117–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofler, E., “O zagadnieniu optymalizacji wielocelowej,” Przeglad Statystyczny, 14, No. 1, 1967, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, B.O., “Fallacies in Operations Research,” Operations Research, 4, No. 4, 1956, 422–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, B.O., “The Optimum Distribution of Effort,” Operations Research, 1, No. 2, 1953, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission Monograph, No. 13, Wiley, New York, 1951, 33–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C., “Objectives, Constraints, and Outcomes in Optimal Growth Models,” Econometrica, 35, 1967, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornbluth, J.S.H., “A Survey of Goal Programming,” OMEGA, 1, No. 2, April 1973, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornbluth J.S.H., “Duality, Indifference and Sensitivity Analysis in Multipie objective Linear Programming,” Operational Research Quarterly, 25, No. 4, December, 1974, 599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornbluth, J.S.H., “Accounting in Multiple Objective Linear Programming,” The Accounting Review, 49, No. 2, April, 1974, 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körth, H., “Zur Beriicksichtigung mehrerer Zielfunktionen bei der Optimierung von Produktionsplänen,” Mathematik und Wirtschaft, Band 6, Die Wirtschaft, Berlin, 1969, 184-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn H.W. and A.W. Tucker, “Nonlinear Programming,” in J. Neyman ed., Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1951, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzimin I.V., E.O. Dedikov and B.Y. Kukharev, “Choice of Global Solution Criterion in Problems with Several Objective Functions,” Soviet Automatic Control, 7, No. 4, 1974, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev, O.I., “Man-Machine Procedures for Decision Making (Review),” Automation and Remote Control, 32, No. 12, 1971, 1973–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larichev O.I. “Method for Evaluating R & D Projects,” Automation and Remote Control, 33, No. 8, 1972, 1356–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D.O., B.E. Moore, D. Sholtz and W.E. Trimble, “A Prototype Test of a Static Multi-Attribute Assignment Model,” Office of Civilian Manpower Management, OCMM Research Report No. 15, Washington, D.C., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedev, B.D., V.V. Podinovskii and R.S. Styrikovic, “An Optimization Problem with Respect to the Ordered Totality of Criteria,” (In Russian), Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, 7, 1971, 612–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and M.M. Bird, Jr., “A Goal Programming Model for Sales Effort Allocation,” Business Perspectives, 6, No. 4, 1970, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M., “Decision Analysis Through Goal Programming,” Decision Sciences, No. 2, 1971, 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M., “Goal Programming for Decision Analysis of Multiple Objectives,” Sloan Management Review, 14, No. 2, 1973, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and E.R. Clayton, “A Goal Programming Model for Academic Resource Allocation,” Management Science, 18, No. 8, 1972, B395–B408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and V. Jääskeläinen, “Goal Programming Management’s Math Model,” Industrial Engineering, 3, No. 2, 1971, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M., Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, Auerbach Publishers, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and R. Nicely, “Goal Programming for Marketing Decisions: A Case Study,” Journal of Marketing, 38, No. 1, 1974, 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and A.J. Lerro, “Optimizing the Portfolio Selection for Mutual Funds,” Journal of Finance, 28, No. 5, 1973, 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and A.J. Lerro, “Capital Budgeting for Multiple Objectives,” Financial Management, 3, No. 1, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M. and L.J. Moore, “Optimizing Transportation Problems with Multiple Objectives,” AIIE Transactions, 5, No. 4, December 1973, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, R. and W. Oettli, “The Theorem of the Alternative, The Key-Theorem, and the Vector-Maximum Problem for Non-Polyhedral Ordering Cones,” Report No. 7428, Institut für Ökonometrie und Operations Research, Universität Bonn, Bonn, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, R. and W. Oettli, “The Theorem of the Alternative, the Key-Theorem, and the Vector-Maximum Problem,” Mathematical Programming, 8, No. 3, 1975, 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitmann, G. and W. Schmitendorf, “Some Sufficient Conditions for Pareto-Optimal Control,” Journal of Dynamical Systems, Measurement and Control, 95, No. 3, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letov, A.M. and Y.A. Rozanov, “On Optimal Compromise for Multidimensional Resource Distribution,” IIASA Research Report, RR-74-8, Laxenburg, June, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.A.Y., “Dynamic Growth of the Firm under Uncertainty with Multiple Goals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 755–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loś, J., “Uwagi o lacznej optymalizacji kilku wielkości”, Przeglad Statystyczny, 12, No. 3, 1965, 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R., “Decision Making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach,” RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA, December 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R., “Improving the System Design and Evaluation Process by the Use of Trade-Off Information: An Application to Northeast Corridor Planning,” RAND Memorandum, RM-5877-DOT, April 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K.R., “An Overview of Multiple Ojective Decision Making,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 18–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, F.J., III, “The Design of Regression Experiments with Multiple Objectives,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 760–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D.C., “Benefit-Cost Ratios for Projects in Multiple Objective Investment Programs,” Water Resources Research, 6, No. 5, 1969, 1174–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, D.C., et al., “Multiple Objective Redesign of the Big Walnut Project,” Water Resources Council — M.I.T. Cooperative Agreement, WRC-69-3, April 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D.C. “Multiobjective Redesign of the Big Walnut Project,” in R. de Neufville and D.H. Marks, eds., Systems Planning and Design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974, 322–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, M.L. and F.L. Hall, “Abstract Representation of Goals,” P-67-24, Department of Civil Engineering, M.I.T., January 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J., “Guided Soul-Searching for Multi-Criterion Decisions,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marusciac, I. and M. Radulescu, “Un Problème Général de la Programmation Linéaire à Plusieurs Fonctions Économiques,” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, 2, 1970, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marusciac, I. and M. Radulescu, “Un Problème de la Programmation Quadratique à Plusieurs Fonctions,” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, 1, 1970, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marusciac, I. and M. Radulescu, “Sur l’Ensemble des Points Efficients d’un Problème de la Programmation Mathématique,” Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatu ‘Al.I.Cuza’ din Iasi,, 18, No. 1, 1972, 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masakazu, K., “Vector Maximum Problems,” Keio Engineering Report, 24, 1971, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, W.S., “Tradeoff Decisions in Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.W. and M.K. Starr, Executive Decisions and Operations Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.L. and D.M. Byers, “Development and Display of Multiple-Objective Project Imports,” Water Resources Research, 9, No. 1, February 1973, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnehan, F.R., “Multiple Objectives and Multigroup Decision Making in Physical Design Situations,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 506–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monarchi, D.E., C.E. Kisiel and L. Duckstein, “Interactive Multiobjective Programming in Water Resources: A Case Study,” Water Resources Research, 9, No. 4, August 1973, 837–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monarchi, D.E., J.E. Weber and L. Duckstein, “An Interactive Multiple Objective Decision Making Aid Using Nonlinear Goal Programming,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgolfier, J. de and J. Tergny, “Les décisions partiellement rationalisables (avenir incertain et critères multiples),” METRA, 10, No. 2, 1971, 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., “On Multiple Criteria Scoring Models,” Management Science, 17, No. 4, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y., “On Some Implications of Maximization with Several Objective Functions,” Working Paper 7006, The Center for Agricultural Economic Research, Rehovot, Israel, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y., “Maximization with Several Objective Functions,” Reprint Series No. 5, The Center for Agricultural Economic Research, Rehovot, Israel, November, 1971, 441-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. and Z. Volcani, “The Correspondence of Efficiency Frontier as a Generalization of the Cost Function,” International Economic Review, 14, No. 1, February 1973., 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, R. and Y.C. Ho, “A Piecewise-closed Form Algorithm for a Family of Minmax and Vector Criteria Problems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-20, No. 3, 1975, 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, H., Y. Sawaragi and H. Sayama, “On an Optimization Problem with Min-Constraints,” International Journal of System Science, 5, No. 10, 1974, 995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykowski, I., “Multi-Criterium Linear Models,” Ekonomista, 4, 1970, 721–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykowski, I., “Problem pogodzenia kilku kryteriów w jednym programie liniowym,” Przeglad Statystyczny, 13, No. 4, 1966, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olech, C., “Existence Theorems for Optimal Problems with Vector-Valued Cost Function,” Transactions of American Mathematical Society, 136, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ören, T.I. and C.Y. Ören, “Solution Selection Techniques for Decision Making in Complex Systems,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 764–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osteryoung, J.S., “Multiple Goals in the Capital Budgeting Decision,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovchinnikov, V.O. and L.M. Boychuk, “Solving the Vector Optimization with a Supplementary Criterion,” (In Russian), Kibernetika i Vychislitelnaya Tekhnika, No. 23, 1974, 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paseual, L.D. and A. Ben-Israel, “Vector-Valued Criteria in Geometric Programming,” Operations Research, 19, No. 1, 1971, 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak, H. and U. Passy, “Bicriterion Mathematical Programs with Boolean Variables,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak, H. and U. Passy, “Finding Global Optimum of Bicriterion Mathematical Programs,” Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Operationelle, 16, No. 1, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, H.J., E. Polak, D.C. Collins and W.S. Meisel, “An Algorithm for Bicriteria Optimization Based on the Sensitivity Function,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-20, No. 4, August 1975, 546–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, M.D., “Jensen’s Inequality for a Convex Vector-Valued Function on an Infinite-Dimensional Space,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 4, 1974, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip, J., “An Algorithm for Combined Quadratic and Multiobjective Programming,” Department of Mathematics, TRIRAR-MAT-1973-5, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, J., “An Algorithm for Determining the Combinatorial Type of a Polytope,” Department of Mathematics, TRITA-MAT-1974-18, Royal Insitute of Technology, Stockholm, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip, J., “Algorithms for the Vector Maximization Problem,” Mathematical Programming, 2, No. 2, 1972, 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippatos, G.C., “On the Specification of Viable Financial Goals,” Managerial Planning, 20, No. 1, 1971, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, V., “Problemes Multicritères,” Cahiers du Centre D’Etudes de Recherche Opérationelle, 16, No. 4, 1974, 425–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podrebarac, M.L. and S.S. Sengupta, “On a Representation of Bargaining and Multi-Agency Action,” Working Paper No. 59, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podrebarac, M.I. and S.S. Sengupta, “Parametric Linear Programming: Some Extensions,” INFOR, 9, No. 3, 1971, 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, E., “On the Approximation of Solutions to Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, 1975, 268-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, W.L. and W.G. Pisker, “The Application of Goal Programming to Manpower Planning,” INFOR, 10, No. 3, 1972, 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P.M. and J.T.R. Jackson, “On the Development of Utility Spaces for Multi-Goal Systems,” Erhvervsokonomisk Tidsskrift, 27, No. 4, 1963, 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzikowski, W., “Die Berücksichtigung mehrerer Zielfunktionen bei Aufgaben der Linearen Optimierung,” Wirtschaftswissenschaft, 5, 1967, 797–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, A.N., “A Note on the Solution of Goal Programming Problems with Preemptive Priority,” New Zealand Operational Research, 2, No. 1, January 1974, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., “Preference for Multi-Attributed Alternatives,” RAND Memorandum, RM-5868-DOT/RC, December 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., “Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, M.G. and F.E. Marchetti, “The Pseudometric View in Problems Involving Vector-Valued Performance Criteria,” Alta Frequenza, 43, No. 7, July 1974, 462–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R.W. and S.J. Citron, “On Noninferior Performance Index Vectors,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 7, No. 1, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R.W. and V. Vemuri, “On the Non-Inferior Index Approach to Large Scale Multi-Criteria Systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 291, No. 4, 1971, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resa, I.D. and L. Ladar, “Consideratii Privind Cumularea Criteriilor de Optimizat in Programerea Liniara,” Revista de Statistica, 8, August, 1973, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzman, L.P. and L.J. Krajewski, “Multiple Objectives in Linear Programming—an Example in Scheduling Postal Resources,” Decision Sciences, 4, No. 3, 1973, 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roba, E., B. Sussmann and M. Theys, “Les méthodes de choix multicritères appliquées à la sélection du personnel,” in Models of Manpower, The English University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, 2, No. 8, 1968, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “Pourquoi des approches multi-critères et comment?” SEMA, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 108, November 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “Problems and Methods with Multiple Objective Functions,” Mathematical Programming, 1, No. 2, 1971, 239–266 (French version in METRA, 9, No. 1, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and P. Bertier, “La méthode ÉLECTRE II (une méthode de classement en présence de critères multiples),” SEMA, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 142, April 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “How Outranking Relation Helps Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “La modélisation des préférences: un aspect crucial de l’aide à la decision,” METRA, No. 2, 1974, 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “Critères multiples et modélisation des préférences,” Revue d’Économie Politique, 84, No. 1, 1974, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., “Why Multicriteria Decision Aid may not Fit in with the Assessment of a Unique Criterion,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, 1975, 280-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudeanu, S., “Programmation bivalente à plusieurs fonctions économiques,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, 3, No. 5-2, 1969, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruefli, T.W., “A Generalized Goal Decomposition Model,” Management Science, 17, No. 8, 1971, B505–B518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruefli, T.W., “Linked Multi-Criteria Decision Models,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 406–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusu, I., “O Metode de Rezolvarea a Problemelor de Programarea Liniară cu mai Multe Funcţii Scop,” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Serie Oeconomica, Fasciculus 1, 1973, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa, M. and Y. Sawaragi, “Multiple-objective Optimization for Environment Development Systems,” Journal of Systems Science, 6, No. 2, 1975, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A.I.A. and V. Gaurishankar, “Optimal Control of Systems with a Single Control and Several Cost Functionals,” International Journal of Control, 14, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama, A.I.A. and M.H. Hamza, “On the Optimization of Static Systems with Several Cost Measures,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-17, No. 1, 1972, 170–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salukvadze, M.E., “Linear Programming Problem with a Vector-Valued Performance Criterion,” Automation and Remote Control, 33, No. 6, 1972, 794–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salukvadze, M.E., “Optimization of Vector Functionals. I, The Programming of Optimal Trajectories,” Automation and Remote Control, 32, No. 8, 1971, 1169–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salukvadze, M.E., “Optimization of Vector Functionals. II. The Analytic Construction of Optimal Controls,” Automation and Remote Control, 32, No. 9, 1971, 1347–1357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salukvadze, M.E., “On the Existence of Solutions in Problems of Optimization Under Vector-Valued Criteria,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 13, No. 1, 1974, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartoris, W.L. and M.L. Spruill, “Goal Programming and Working Capital Management,” Financial Management, 3, No. 1, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saska, J., “Lineární Multiprogramování,” Ekonomicko-Matematický Obzor, 4, No. 3, 1968, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savir, D., “Multi-objective Linear Programming,” Operations Research Center, College of Engineering, No. ORC 66-21, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayeki, Y. and K.H. Vespers, “Allocation of Importance in Hierarchical Goal Structure,” Management Science, 19, No. 6, 1973, 667–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.W. and G.K. Bennett, “Economic Multiattribute Acceptance Sampling,” AIIE Transactions, 4, No. 3, 1972, 194–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitendorf, W.E., “Cooperative Games and Vector-Valued Criteria Problems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-18, No. 2, 1973, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönfeld, P., “Some Duality Theorems for the Non-Linear Vector Maximum Problem,” Unternehmensforschung, 14, No. 1, 1970, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L.E., “Uncertainty Reduction Over Time in the Theory of Multiattributed Utility,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld, J.H. and W.Z. McBride, “Optimization with Multiple Performance Criteria,” I & EC Process Design and Development, 9, No. 1, 1970, 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, S.S., M.L. Podrebarac, and T.D.H. Fernando, “Probabilities of Optima in Multi-Objective Linear Programmes,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelly, M.W. and G.L. Bryan, eds., Human Judgment and Qptimality, Wiley, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R.N., “On Subjectively Optimum Selection Among Multiattribute Alternatives,” in M.W. Shelly and G.L. Bryan, eds., Human Judgment and Optimality, Wiley, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J.K. and J. Siegel, “Quadratic Preferences and Goal Programming,” Decision Sciences, 6, No. 4, 1975, 662–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K. and Y. Anzai, “Optimisation for a Hierarchical System with Independent Local Objectives,” (In Japanese), Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 10, No. 1, 1974, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K., S. Hiyoshi and T. Hirose, “Multiple Objective Programming-Optimization Algorithms for Multiple Objective Systems,” (In Japanese), No. 2, 1975, 152–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, J. and G.B. Hatfield, “A Theoretical Approach to Multiobjective Problems,” Working Paper, Navy Personel Research and Development Center, San Diego, California, September, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, N.K., V. Temple and J-C. Rey, “A Vector Cost Function for Efficient Adaptation,” International Journal of Control, 16, No. 6, 1972, 1107–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, S., “Global Analysis and Economics I. Pareto Optimum and a Generalization of Morse Theory,” in M. Pexieto, ed., Dynamical Systems, Academic Press, New York 1973, 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.H., R.W. Lawless and B. Shenoy, “Evaluating Multiple Criteria — Models for Two Criteria Situations,” Decision Sciences, 5, No. 4, 1974, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solich, R., “Zadanie programowania liniowego z wieloma funkcjami celu,” Przeglad Statystyczny, 16, Nos. 3-4, 1969, 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosinka, J., “Optimum Pareto dla Programow Liniowych i Kryteriow Rozlaeznych,” Przeglad Statystyczny, 18, Nos. 3-4, 1971, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, W.A. and H. Tamura, “Goal Programming in Econometrics,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 17, No. 2, 1970, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V. and G.L. Thompson, “Alternate Formulations for Static Multi-Attribute Assignment Models,” Management Science, 20, No. 2, October, 1973, 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalbo, A.K., “Automatic Control System Optimisation with Several Criteria,” (In Russian), Avtomatika i Sistemy Upravlenia, No. 1, 1974, 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalford, H.L., “Criteria for Pareto Optimality in Cooperative Differential Games,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 9, No. 6, 1972, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancu-Minasian, I.M., “A Selected Bibliography of Works Related to the Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” Preprint No. 2, Academy of Economic Studies, Department of Economic Cybernetics, Bucharest, Romania, February 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancu-Minasian, I.M., “Analiza Unor Puncte de Vedere in Programarea Maternatica cu mai Multe Functii Obiectiv,” Studii şi Cercetări de Calcul Economic şi Cybernetică Economică, No. 3, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancu-Minasian, I.M., “Stochastic Programming with Multiple Objective Functions,” Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 1, 1974, 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankard, M.F., C. Maier-Rothe and S.K. Gupta, “Choosing Between Multiple Objective Alternatives: A Linear Programming Approach,” Management Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedry, A.C. and A. Charnes, “Investigations in the Theory of Multiple Budgeted Goals,” in C.P. Bonini, R.K. Jaedicke and H.M. Wagner, eds., Management Controls: New Directions in Basic Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964, 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R.J. and A. Ben-Israel, “An Interior Penalty Function Method for the Construction of Efficient Points in a Multiple-Criteria Control Problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 46, No. 3, 1974, 768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R.J. and A. Ben-Israel, “On Linear Optimal Control Problems with Multiple Quadratic Criteria,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E., “ADEX: An Adjacent Efficient Extreme Point Algorithm for Solving Vector-Maximum and Interval Weighted-Sums Linear Programming Problems,” Distribution Code 360D-15.2.014, SHARE Program Library Agency, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffaes, C., “Analyse multicritère, optimalité des choix collectifs et marché des mariages,” Théorie de la Décision, Actes du Séminaire de Beaulieu Sainte-Assise, 6–7 décembre 1973, Ed. CESMAP, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szaniawski, K., “Some Remarks Concerning the Criterion of Rational Decision Making,” Studia Logica, 9, 1960, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M.J. and A. Reisman, “A Proposed Generalized Heuristic Algorithm for Scheduling with Respect to N-Interreltated Criterion Functions,” The International Journal of Production Research, 5, No. 2, 1966, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamm, M.I., “Linear Programming Problem Solution with Several Objective Functions,” (In Russian), Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, 9, No. 2, 1973, 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, K., “Linear Optimal Problems with a Vector-valued Performance Index,” (In Japanese), Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 10, No. 6, 1974, 749–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.L., “Consistent Multiattributed Decision Procedures,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 774–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tell, B., “A Comparative Study of Four Multiple Criteria Evaluation Methods,” Working Paper 6028, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, January, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terny, G., “D’une rationalisation des décisions économiques de l’état à la fonction de préférence étatique,” Analyse et Prévision, 10, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, H., “Comparative Evaluation of Performance Using Multiple Criteria,” Management Science, 9, No. 3, 1963, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuessen, J.G., “A Study of Public Attitudes and Multiple Objective Decision Criteria for Water Pollution Control Projects,” School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, June, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, H.M., “Aggregation of Attributes for Multi-Attributed Utility Assessment,” Technical Report No. 66, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischchenko, V.N., “Vector Optimization of an Ordered Set of Criteria,” (In Russian), Problemy Bioniki, No. 13, 1974, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatcu, M., “O Metoda de Rezolvare a Unie Probleme de Programarea Liniară cu mai Multe Functii Obiectiv,” Studii şi Cercetări de Calcul Economic şi Cybernetica Economică, No. 2, 1975, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, J.N., “Multiattribute Decision Making Under Uncertainty Using Bounded Intervals,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, J., “Planning Problems with Multidimensional Consequences,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 36, No. 2, 1970, 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehovec, M., “Simple Criterion for the Global Regularity of Vector-Valued Functions,” Electronics Letters, 5, 1969, 680–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradskaya, T.M. and M.G. Gaft, “An Exact Upper Bound for the Number of Nonsubordinate Solutions in Multicriterion Problems,” Automation and Remote Control, 35, No. 9, 1974, 1474–1481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich, V.L. and L.F. Darheyko, “On One Algorithm of Choosing a Compromise Solution for Linear Criteria,” (In Russian), Kibernetika, No. 5, 1972, 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich, V.L. and M.F. Radomskiy, “Preliminary Sifting of Nonpromising Versions of Complex Control Systems by Criteria in the Form of Concave Functions,” Soviet Automatic Control, 8, No. 1, 1975, 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich, V.L. and A.P. Gorchinskiy, “Construction of Compromise Set and Taking a Complex Decision on a Given Set of Versions,” (In Russian), Preprint 71-30, Inst. Cybern., Academy of Sciences UKrSSR, Kiev, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich, V.L., “Multicriteria Problems and their Methods of Solution,” (In Russian), Coll. Cybernetics and Computing Techniques, No. 1, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich, V.L. and A.P. Gorchinskiy, “An Algorithm for Ordering the Versions of a Complex System on the Basis of Additive Criteria,” (In Russian), Coll. Cybernetics and Computing Techniques, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J., “Comparative Evaluation of some Interactive Approaches to Multi-Criterion Optimization,” Working Paper, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J. and S. Zionts, “Some Tests of an Interactive Programming Method for Multicriterion Optimization and an Attempt at Implementation,” Working Paper 75-3, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J., “Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization,” Management Science, 21, No. 12, August 1975, 1387–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J., Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Methods: An Investigation and An Approach, Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis, Series A: 14, The Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, F.M., “An Engineering Approach: Hierarchical Optimization Criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-12, 1967, 179–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N.S., “Multiple Incentive Fee Maximization: An Economic Model,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, No. 4, 1963, 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C.M., “Multiple Goals in the Theory of the Firm,” in K.E. Boulding and W.A. Spivey, eds., Linear Programming and the Theory of the Firm, Macmillan, New York, 1960, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, J.W., A Method for Measuring Decision Assumptions, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F.E., “On the Evaluation of Intertemporal Outcomes,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterfeldt, D. von and G.W. Fischer, “Multiattribute Utility Theory: Models and Assessment Procedures,” Technical Report No. 011313-7-T, Engineering Psychology Laboratory, University of Michigan, November, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterfeldt, D. von and W. Edwards, “Evaluation of Complex Stimuli Using Multiattribute Utility Procedures,” Technical Report No. 011313-2-T, Engineering Psychology Laboratory, University of Michigan, October, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterfeldt, D. von and G.W. Fischer, “Multi-attribute Utility Theory: Models and Assessment Procedures,” in D. Wendt and C. Vlek, eds., Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “A Class of Solutions for Group Decisions Problems,” Center for System Science, 71-06, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives,” Center for System Science, 72-02, Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “Nondominated Investment Policies in Stock Market (Including an Empirical Study),” Systems Analysis Program, Graduate School of Management, F 7222, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “The Set of All Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives,” System Analysis Program, Working Paper Series, No. F 71-32, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and M. Zeleny, “On Some Linear Multi-Parametric Programs,” Center for System Science, CSS 73-05, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and M. Zeleny, “The Set of all Nondominated Solutions in Linear Cases and a Multicriteria Simplex Method,” Center for System Science, CSS 73-03, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., and G. Leitmann, “Nondominated Decisions and Cone Convexity in Dynamic Multicriteria Decision Problems,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 14, No. 5, 1974, 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points, and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems with Multiobjectives,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 14, No. 3, 1974, 319–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and G. Leitmann, “Compromise Solutions, Domination Structures, and Salukvadze’s Solution,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 13, No. 3, 1974, 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and M. Zeleny, “The Techniques of Linear Multiobjective Programming,” Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Operationelle, 8, November 1974, No. 5-3, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “Introduction to Domination Structures in Multicriteria Decision Problems,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and M. Zeleny, “The Set of All Nondominated Solutions in Linear Cases and a Multicriteria Simplex Method,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 49, No. 2, 1975, 430–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “Domination Structures and Nondominated Solutions,” Working Paper 74-11, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and G. Leitmann, “Confidence Structures in Decision Making,” Center for Cybernetic Studies, CCS 231, University of Texas, Austin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L., “A Class of Solutions for Group Decisions Problems,” Management Science, 19, No. 8, 1973, 936–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. and G. Leitmann, “Compromise Solutions, Domination Structures and Salukvadze’s Solution,”. Problems of Control and Information Theory, 2, No. 3–4, 1973, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A., “Optimality and Nonscalar-Valued Performance Criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-8, No. 1, 1963, 59–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A., “Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 686–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zak, Y.A., “Models and Methods of Constructing Compromise Plans in Problems of Mathematical Programming with Several Objective Functions,” (In Russian), Kibernetika, No. 4, 1972, 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangemeister, C., Nutzwertanalyse in der Systemtechnik, Wittemansche Buchhandlung, Munchen, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “The Theory of the Displaced Ideal,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 151–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. and J.L. Cochrane, “A Priori and A Posteriori Goals in Macroeconomic Policy Making,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “A Selected Bibliography of Works Related to the Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 779–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “Compromise Programming,” in J.L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny, eds., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C., 1973, 262–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., Linear Multiobjective Programming, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “A Concept of Compromise Solutions and the Method of the Displaced Ideal,” Computers and Operations Research, 1, No. 4, 1974, 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., “Multicriteria Simplex Method: A FORTRAN Routine,” in M. Zeleny, ed., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Kyoto 1975, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975, 318–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zionts, S. and J. Wallenius, “A Simplex-Type Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem,” Working Paper 73-44, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zionts, S. and J. Wallenius, “On Finding the Subset of Efficient Vectors of an Arbitrary Set of Vectors,” Working Paper 75-4, European Institute for Advanced Stuides in Management, Brussels, January, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zionts, S. and J. Wallenius, “An Interactive Linear Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem,” Working Paper 74-10, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zrnovský, P., “The Possibilities of Multigoal Optimization in Network Analysis,” Ekonomicko-Matematický Obzor, 2, 1972, 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeleny, M. (1976). MCDM Bibliography — 1975. In: Zeleny, M. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making Kyoto 1975. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 123. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45486-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45486-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-07684-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45486-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics