Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction pp 159–179Cite as

Femoral Bone Tunnel Placement (Arthroscopically and with Fluoroscopy)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is critical to the success and clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction [1–11]. Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is defined as a single-bundle ACL reconstruction in which the femoral and tibial bone tunnels are positioned at the center of the native ACL femoral and tibial attachment sites [1, 3, 12, 13]. Nonanatomic ACL tunnel placement is the most common technical error leading to recurrent instability and a failed ACL reconstruction [2, 4–7, 9–11]. Proper placement of the ACL femoral tunnel is especially important because the length and tension of the ACL replacement graft is most influenced by the position of the ACL femoral tunnel [14–18]. Malposition of the ACL femoral tunnel can cause excessive tightening or loosening of the ACL graft, which may result in a loss of motion and or patholaxity of the knee [2, 4–11, 15–18]. Proper placement of the femoral tunnel during ACL reconstruction is therefore a critical part of the surgical procedure. A working knowledge of the anatomy of the ACL femoral attachment site is important to ensure anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel. The anatomy of the ACL has been discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this book. To summarize, the ACL femoral attachment site is oval in appearance and is located along the lower third of the inner wall of the lateral femoral condyle [13, 14, 19–26]. The ACL femoral attachment site is defined by two bony ridges, the lateral intercondylar and the lateral bifurcate ridges [13, 20, 22–24, 26, 27] (Fig. 19.1). The lateral intercondylar ridge is an important anatomic landmark since the native ACL always attaches inferior (arthroscopic description) or posterior (anatomic description) to the lateral intercondylar ridge [3, 20, 22–24, 26–28] (Fig. 19.1). The lateral intercondylar ridge can be identified arthroscopically in 88 % of subacute and chronic ACL-deficient knees and therefore is a consistent anatomic landmark to assist the knee surgeon with placement of the ACL femoral tunnel [29]. The lateral bifurcate ridge which can be identified arthroscopically in 48 % of subacute and chronic knees runs perpendicular to the lateral intercondylar ridge and divides the ACL femoral attachment site into the attachment site areas for the posterolateral (PL) and anteromedial (AM) bundles [3, 12, 13, 20, 22, 24, 26] (Fig. 19.1). The center of the ACL femoral attachment site is 1.7 mm deep or proximal to the bifurcate ridge and 7.3–8.5 mm superior or anterior to the inferior or posterior articular cartilage margin of the lateral femoral condyle [8, 21, 23, 28]. For anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the center of the ACL femoral attachment site is chosen as the position for the ACL femoral tunnel [1, 3, 5, 12, 13, 30–32]. Biomechanical and clinical studies have demonstrated that ACL reconstruction using a replacement graft placed at the center of the ACL femoral and tibial attachment sites is more effective at controlling anterior tibial translation and the combined motions of anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation (simulated pivot shift test) and restores knee kinematics more closely to that of the normal knee compared to “isometric” ACL femoral tunnel placement, other anatomic ACL tunnel placements, or techniques that have traditionally restored predominantly the AM bundle fibers [1, 6, 30–38].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A et al (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:199–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2. Clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sport Med 39:2016–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2012) Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry of knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 40:1551–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marchant B, Noyes F, Barber-Westin S, Fleckenstein C (2010) Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:1987–1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadoghi P, Kröpfl A, Jansson V et al (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sommer C, Friederich NF, Müller W (2000) Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament graft: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trojani C, Sbihi A, Dijan P et al (2011) Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:196–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wetzler MJ, Getelman MH, Friedman MJ, Bartolozzi AF (1998) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: etiology of failures. Oper Tech Sports Med 6:64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitehead TS (2013) Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 32:177–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP et al (2010) Descriptive epidemiology of the multicenter ACL revision study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med 38:1979–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 26:258–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yasada K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1, Basic science. Am J Sport Med 39:1789–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amis AA, Jakob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(Suppl 1):S2–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bylski-Austrow DL, Grood ES, Hefsy MS (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle of tensioning, and initial tensioning. J Orthop Res 8:522–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grood ES (1992) Placement of knee ligament grafts. In: Finerman GA, Noyes FR (eds) Biology and biomechanics of the traumatized synovial joint: the knee as a model. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hefzy MS, Grood ES (1986) Sensitivity of insertion locations on the length patterns of anterior cruciate ligament fibers. J Biomech Eng 108:73–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hefzy MS, Grood ES, Noyes FR (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: Anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:208–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Columbet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi J-P et al (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22:984–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu F (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaseta MK, DeFrate LE, Charnock BL, Sullivan RT, Garrett WE (2008) Reconstruction technique affect femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1467

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y et al (2012) The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy 28:1135–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Furaka A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ziegler CG, Pietrini SD, Westerhaus BD, Anderson CJ et al (2011) Arthroscopically pertinent landmarks for tunnel positioning in single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 39:743–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shino K, Suzuki T, Iwahashi T, Mae T et al (2010) The resident’s ridge as an arthroscopic landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1164–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zantop T, Wellman M, Fu FH, Peterson W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Eck CF, Morse KR, Lesniak BP, Kropf EJ et al (2010) Does the lateral intercondylar ridge disappear in ACL deficient patients? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1184–1188

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kato Y, Ingham SJM, Kramer S et al (2010) Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kato Y, Maeyama A, Lertwanich P, Wang JH et al (2013) Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:816–823

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA (2011) Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39:279–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27:380–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Driscoll MD, Isabell GP, Conditt MA, Ismaily BS et al (2012) Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 28:1481–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between the 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 19:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc AH et al (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions. Effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33:712–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL, Van Scyoc A et al (2004) Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 32:1825–1832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Araujo PH, van Eck CF, Macalena JA, Fu FH (2011) Advances in the three-portal technique for single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1239–1242

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen SB, Fu FH (2007) Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal. Arthroscopy 23:325.e1–325.e4

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tompkins M, Milewski MD, Carson EW et al (2013) Femoral tunnel length in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an accessory medial portal. Arthroscopy 29:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hensler D, Working Z, Illingworth K, Thorhauer E, Tashman S, Fu F (2011) Medial portal drilling: effects on the femoral tunnel aperture morphology during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2063–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bird J, Carmont M, Dhillon M, Smith N, Brown C, Thompson P, Spalding T (2011) Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-D computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 27:1259–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pietrini SD, Ziegler CG, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA et al (2011) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:792–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lobenhoffer P, Bernard M, Agneskirchner J (2003) Quality assurance in cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopie 16:202–208 (German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Passler H, Hoher J (2004) Intraoperative quality control of the placement of bone tunnels for the anterior cruciate ligament. Unfallchirurg 107:263–272 (in German)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA-Q et al (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92-A:1418–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJM, Tajima G, Horaguchi T et al (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1226–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lorenz S, Elser F, Mitterer M, Obst T, Imhoff AB (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the insertion sites of the 2 functional bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 37:2368–2376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK

    Tim Spalding & Curtis Robb

  2. International Knee and Joint Centre, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Charles H. Brown Jr.

Authors
  1. Tim Spalding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Curtis Robb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles H. Brown Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Spalding .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ATOS Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Rainer Siebold

  2. Lyon Ortho Clinic, Lyon, France

    David Dejour

  3. Istituti Ortopedico Rizzoli Clinica Ortopedica Traumatologica III, Bologna, Italy

    Stefano Zaffagnini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 ESSKA

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spalding, T., Robb, C., Brown, C.H. (2014). Femoral Bone Tunnel Placement (Arthroscopically and with Fluoroscopy). In: Siebold, R., Dejour, D., Zaffagnini, S. (eds) Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45349-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45349-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45348-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45349-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation