Skip to main content

2COMM: A Commitment-Based MAS Architecture

  • Conference paper
Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8245))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social expectations and social dependencies are a key characteristic of interaction, which should be explicitly accounted for by the agent platform, supporting the coordination of the involved autonomous peers. To this aim, it is necessary to provide a normative characterization of coordination and give a social meaning to the agents’ actions. We focus on one of the best-known agent platforms, Jade, and show that it is possible to account for the social layer of interaction by exploiting commitment-based protocols, by modifying the Jade Methodology so as to include the new features in a seamless way, and by relying on the notion of artifact, along the direction outlined in the Mercurio proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. FIPA specifications, http://www.fipa.org

  2. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C.: Some Thoughts about Commitment Protocols. In: Baldoni, M., Dennis, L., Mascardi, V., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) DALT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7784, pp. 190–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Bergenti, F., Marengo, E., Mascardi, V., Patti, V., Ricci, A., Santi, A.: An interaction-oriented agent framework for open environments. In: Pirrone, R., Sorbello, F. (eds.) AI*IA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6934, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Marengo, E., Patti, V., Ricci, A.: Back to the future: An interaction-oriented framework for social computing. In: First Int. Workshop on Req. Eng. for Social Computing, RESC, pp. 2–5. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Capuzzimati, F., Marengo, E., Patti, V.: A generalized commitment machine for 2CL protocols and its implementation. In: Baldoni, M., Dennis, L., Mascardi, V., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) DALT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7784, pp. 96–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Marengo, E., Patti, V., Capuzzimati, F.: Engineering commitment-based business protocols with 2CL methodology. J. of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (to appear, August 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baldoni, M., Boella, G., Genovese, V., Mugnaini, A., Grenna, R., van der Torre, L.: A Middleware for Modeling Organizations and Roles in Jade. In: Braubach, L., Briot, J.-P., Thangarajah, J. (eds.) ProMAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5919, pp. 100–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Baldoni, M., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Bridging agent theory and object orientation: Agent-like communication among objects. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4411, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldoni, M., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Interaction between Objects in powerjava. Journal of Object Technology 6(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A.: JADE A FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: Developing multi-agent systems with a FIPA-compliant agent framework. Software-Practice and Experience, 103–128 (July 1999, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernon, C., Gleizes, M.P., Peyruqueou, S., Picard, G.: Adelfe: A methodology for adaptive multi-agent systems engineering. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2577, pp. 156–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: An agent oriented ontology of social reality. In: Procs. of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems (FOIS). IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: The ontological properties of social roles in multi-agent systems: definitional dependence, powers and roles playing roles. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15(3), 201–221 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boissier, O., Bordini, R.H., Hbner, J., Ricci, A., Santi, A.: Multi-agent oriented programming with jacamo. Science of Computer Programming (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caire, G., Coulier, W., Garijo, F.J., Gomez, J., Pavón, J., Leal, F., Chainho, P., Kearney, P.E., Stark, J., Evans, R., Massonet, P.: Agent Oriented Analysis Using Message/UML. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 119–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Caire, G., Gotta, D., Banzi, M.: Wade: a software platform to develop mission critical applications exploiting agents and workflows. In: AAMAS (Industry Track), pp. 29–36. IFAAMAS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Castelfranchi, C.: Principles of Individual Social Action. In: Contemporary Action Theory: Social Action, vol. 2, pp. 163–192. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: An Architecture for Multiagent Systems: An Approach Based on Commitments. In: Proc. of ProMAS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chopra, A.K.: Commitment Alignment: Semantics, Patterns, and Decision Procedures for Distributed Computing. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F.: Autonomous Norm Acceptance. In: Papadimitriou, C., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 99–112. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Dastani, M., Grossi, D., Meyer, J.-J.C., Tinnemeier, N.: Normative multi-agent programs and their logics. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Broersen, J. (eds.) KRAMAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5605, pp. 16–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietz, J.L.G.: Understanding and Modeling Business Processes with DEMO. In: Akoka, J., Bouzeghoub, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Métais, E. (eds.) ER 1999. LNCS, vol. 1728, pp. 188–202. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. El-Menshawy, M., Bentahar, J., Dssouli, R.: Symbolic model checking commitment protocols using reduction. In: Omicini, A., Sardina, S., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) DALT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6619, pp. 185–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Colombetti, M.: Agent communication and artificial institutions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(2), 121–142 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: Artificial institutions: a model of institutional reality for open multiagent systems. Artif. Intell. Law 16(1), 89–105 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hubner, J.F., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents: “Giving the organisational power back to the agents”. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. Inf. Soc. 9(4), 391–404 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen, M.T., Fuhrer, P., Pasquier-Rocha, J.: Enhancing e-health information systems with agent technology. Int. J. Telemedicine Appl. 2009, 1:1–1:13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nikraz, M., Caire, G., Bahri, P.A.: A Methodology for the Analysis and Design of Multi-Agent Systems using JADE (May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Okouya, D., Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: An infrastructure for the design and development of open interaction systems. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) EMAS 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8245, pp. 217–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ricci, A., Piunti, M., Viroli, M.: Environment programming in multi-agent systems: an artifact-based perspective. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 23(2), 158–192 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodrigues, T.F., da Rocha Costa, A.C., Dimuro, G.P.: A Communication Infrastructure Based on Artifacts for the JaCaMo Platform. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) EMAS 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8245, Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Singh, M.P.: An Ontology for Commitments in Multiagent Systems. Artif. Intell. Law 7(1), 97–113 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS, vol. 1916, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh, M.P.: LoST: Local Transfer - An Architectural Style for the Distributed Enactment of Business Protocols. In: Proc. of the 9th Internactional Conference on Web Services, pp. 57–64. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Telang, P.R., Singh, M.P.: Specifying and Verifying Cross-Organizational Business Models: An Agent-Oriented Approach. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design. Addison-Wesley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wood, M.F., DeLoach, S.A.: An overview of the multiagent systems engineering methodology. In: Ciancarini, P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) AOSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1957, pp. 207–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Designing and executing protocols using the event calculus. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents, AGENTS 2001, pp. 27–28 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Commitment Machines. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 235–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Yolum, P.: Design time analysis of multiagent protocols. Data Knowledge Engineering 63(1), 137–154 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: The gaia methodology. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 12(3), 317–370 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Capuzzimati, F. (2013). 2COMM: A Commitment-Based MAS Architecture. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45343-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics