Skip to main content

The Complexity of Clausal Fragments of LTL

  • Conference paper
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2013)

Abstract

We introduce and investigate a number of fragments of propositional temporal logic LTL over the flow of time (ℤ, <). The fragments are defined in terms of the available temporal operators and the structure of the clausal normal form of the temporal formulas. We determine the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for each of the fragments, which ranges from NLogSpace to PTime, NP and PSpace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apostol, T.: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. Springer (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M.: Reasoning over extended ER models. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 277–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Kontchakov, R., Zakharyaschev, M.: The DL-Lite family and relations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 36, 1–69 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M.: Past and future of DL-Lite. In: Proc. of AAAI, pp. 243–248 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M.: Complexity of reasoning over temporal data models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M.: The Complexity of Clausal Fragments of LTL. CoRR abs/1306.5088 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauland, M., Schneider, T., Schnoor, H., Schnoor, I., Vollmer, H.: The complexity of generalized satisfiability for linear temporal logic. Logical Methods in Computer Science 5(1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G.: Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 70–118 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3), 385–429 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, C.-C., Lin, I.-P.: The computational complexity of satisfiability of temporal Horn formulas in propositional linear-time temporal logic. Information Processing Letters 45(3), 131–136 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chrobak, M.: Finite automata and unary languages. Theoretical Computer Science 47(2), 149–158 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Demri, S., Schnoebelen, P.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics in simple cases. Information and Computation 174(1), 84–103 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon, C., Fisher, M., Konev, B.: Tractable temporal reasoning. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 318–323 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, M.: A resolution method for temporal logic. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 99–104. Morgan Kaufmann (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, M., Dixon, C., Peim, M.: Clausal temporal resolution. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2(1), 12–56 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gabbay, D., Hodkinson, I., Reynolds, M.: Temporal Logic: Mathematical Foundations and Computational Aspects, vol. 1. Oxford University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gabbay, D., Kurucz, A., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications. Elsevier (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Halpern, J., Reif, J.: The propositional dynamic logic of deterministic, well-structured programs. In: Proc. of FOCS, pp. 322–334. IEEE (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtenstein, O., Pnueli, A., Zuck, L.D.: The glory of the past. In: Parikh, R. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1985. LNCS, vol. 193, pp. 196–218. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Temporal description logics: A survey. In: Proc. of TIME, pp. 3–14. IEEE Comp. Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Markey, N.: Past is for free: On the complexity of verifying linear temporal properties with past. Acta Informatica 40(6-7), 431–458 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ono, H., Nakamura, A.: On the size of refutation Kripke models for some linear modal and tense logics. Studia Logica 39, 325–333 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Plaisted, D.: A decision procedure for combinations of propositional temporal logic and other specialized theories. Journal of Automated Reasoning 2, 171–190 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabinovich, A.: Temporal logics over linear time domains are in PSPACE. In: Kučera, A., Potapov, I. (eds.) RP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6227, pp. 29–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Reynolds, M.: The complexity of decision problems for linear temporal logics. Journal of Studies in Logic 3(1), 19–50 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sistla, A., Clarke, E.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. In: Proc. of STOC, pp. 159–168. ACM (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stockmeyer, L., Meyer, A.: Word problems requiring exponential time: Preliminary report. In: Proc. of STOC, pp. 1–9. ACM (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  28. To, A.W.: Unary finite automata vs. arithmetic progressions. Information Processing Letters 109(17), 1010–1014 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Artale, A., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., Zakharyaschev, M. (2013). The Complexity of Clausal Fragments of LTL. In: McMillan, K., Middeldorp, A., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8312. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45220-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45221-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics