Abstract
Basic psychophysics tells us that decisions are rarely perfect: even with identical stimuli choice accuracy fluctuates and errors are often made. Metacognition allows appraisal of this uncertainty and correction of errors. For more complex value-based choices, however, metacognitive processes are poorly understood. In particular, how subjective confidence and valuation of choice options interact at the level of brain and behaviour is unknown. In this chapter, we summarise and discuss the results of a study designed to investigate this relationship. Subjects were asked to choose between pairs of snack items and subsequently provide a confidence rating in their choice. As predicted by a computational model of the decision process, confidence reflected the evolution of a decision variable over time, explaining the observed relation between confidence, value, accuracy and reaction time (RT). Furthermore, fMRI signal in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) reflected both value comparison and confidence in the value comparison process. In contrast, individuals’ metacognitive ability was predicted by a measure of functional connectivity between vmPFC and rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (rlPFC), a region that responded to changes in confidence but was not involved in representing the values used to guide choice. These results provide a novel link between noise in value comparison and metacognitive awareness of choice, extending the study of metacognition to value-based decision-making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baranski JV, Petrusic WM (2001) Testing architectures of the decision-confidence relation. Can J Exp Psychol 55(3):195–206
Basten U et al (2010) How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21767–21772
Beck JM et al (2012) Not noisy, just wrong: The role of suboptimal inference in behavioral variability. Neuron 74(1):30–39
Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav Sci 9(3):226–232
Bogacz R et al (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113(4):700–765
Daniel R, Pollmann S (2012) Striatal activations signal prediction errors on confidence in the absence of external feedback. NeuroImage 59(4):3457–3467
Daw N (2011) Trial-by-trial data analysis using computational models. In: Delgado MR, Phelps EA, Robbins TW (eds) Decision making, affect, and learning: Attention and performance XXIII. Oxford University Press, Oxford
De Martino B et al (2013) Confidence in value-based choice. Nat Neurosci 16(1):105–110
De Martino B et al (2009) The neurobiology of reference-dependent value computation. J Neurosci 29(12):3833–3842
Faisal AA, Selen LPJ, Wolpert DM (2008) Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(4):292–303
FitzGerald THB, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2009) The role of human orbitofrontal cortex in value comparison for incommensurable objects. J Neurosci 29(26):8388–8395
Fleming SM et al (2010) Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329(5998):1541–1543
Fleming SM, Huijgen J, Dolan RJ (2012) Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 32(18):6117–6125
Friston K (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11(2):127–138
Glimcher PW (2005) Indeterminacy in brain and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 56:25–56
Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2006) Random expected utility. Econometrica 74(1):121–146
Hare TA et al (2008) Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. J Neurosci 28(22):5623–5630
Hare TA, Malmaud J, Rangel A (2011) Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. J Neurosci 31(30):11077–11087
Hunt LT et al (2012) Mechanisms underlying cortical activity during value-guided choice. Nat Neurosci 15:470–476
Insabato A et al (2010) Confidence-related decision making. J Neurophysiol 104(1):539–547
Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2007) The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 10(12):1625–1633
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory—analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291
Kepecs A et al (2008) Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455(7210):227–231
Kiani R, Shadlen M (2009) Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324(5928):759
Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27(12):712–719
Koriat A (1997) Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. J Exp Psychol Gen 126(4):349
Koriat A, Goldsmith M (1996) Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychol Rev 103(3):490–517
Lau H, Rosenthal D (2011) Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 15(8):365–373
Louviere J et al (2002) Dissecting the random component of utility. Mark Lett 13(3):177–193
Maniscalco B, Lau H (2012) A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious Cogn 21(1):422–430
Maniscalco B, Lau H (2010) Comparing signal detection models of perceptual decision confidence. J Vis 10(7):213
McCurdy LY et al (2013) Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. J Neurosci 33(5):1897–1906
McFadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J Bus pp S13–S29
Milosavljevic M et al (2010) The drift diffusion model can account for value-based choice response times under high and low time pressure. Judgement Decis Making 5:437–449
Moreno-Bote R (2010) Decision confidence and uncertainty in diffusion models with partially correlated neuronal integrators. Neural Comput 22(7):1786–1811
Nelson TO, Narens L (1990) Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychol Learn Motiv 26, 125–322
Pasquali A, Timmermans B, Cleeremans A (2010) Know thyself: Metacognitive networks and measures of consciousness. Cognition 117(2):182–190
Plassmann H, O’Doherty J, Rangel A (2007) Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J Neurosci 27(37):9984–9988
Pleskac TJ, Busemeyer JR (2010) Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychol Rev 117(3):864–901
Rangel A, Hare T (2010) Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(2):262–270
Ratcliff R, Rouder JN (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 9(5):347–356
Ratcliff R, Starns JJ (2009) Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychol Rev 116(1):59–83
Rolls ET, Grabenhorst F, Deco G (2010) Choice, difficulty, and confidence in the brain. NeuroImage 53(2):694–706
Rounis E et al (2010) Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness. Cogn Neurosci 1(3):165–175
Rushworth MFS et al (2011) Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making. Neuron 70(6):1054–1069
Smith DV et al (2010) Distinct value signals in anterior and posterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 30(7):2490–2495
Soltani A, De Martino B, Camerer C (2012) A range-normalization model of context-dependent choice: A new model and evidence. PLoS Comput Biol 8(7):e1002607
Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2005) Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(5):363–375
Summerfield C, Tsetsos K (2012) Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: Neural and computational mechanisms. Frontiers Neurosci 6:70
Usher M, McClelland JL (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108(3):550–592
Vickers D (1979) Decision processes in visual perception. Academic Press, New York
Wang S et al (2012) The role of risk aversion in non-conscious decision making. Frontiers Psychol 3
Yokoyama O et al (2010) Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance. Neurosci Res 68(3):199–206
Zylberberg A, Barttfeld P, Sigman M (2012) The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision. Frontiers Integr Neurosci 6
Acknowledgments
The research reviewed in this chapter was supported by the Wellcome Trust. SMF is supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship (WT096185). BDM is supported by a UCL early career fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleming, S.M., De Martino, B. (2014). Metacognition and Confidence in Value-Based Choice. In: Fleming, S., Frith, C. (eds) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45189-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45190-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)