Skip to main content

Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Quarterly Evidence from Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In 2003, following other developed and developing economies, the Capital Markets Board of Turkey (CMB) issued Corporate Governance Principles, in order to improve the board structure, increase shareholders rights, and enhance financial reporting quality through public disclosure and transparency in order to raise public confidence in, and restructure the Turkish capital market. One of the central issues in corporate governance is that there is no unique definition of good corporate governance practices that fit with the needs of all jurisdictions or firms. Considering Turkey’s legal environment, the effectiveness of corporate governance principles in the country is of utmost importance. The CG principles developed in the country were adapted from Corporate Governance Principles of the OECD, which is a subject of debate in terms of enhancing the firm value. Therefore, this chapter aims to present the role of corporate governance on the quality of reported earnings of the ISE listed firms. Overall, the results indicate that the role of the board on quarterly earnings management in Turkey is highly contradictory and it is related to the direction of earnings management and external audit conducted by the Big-4 accountancy firms. Therefore, as a further policy implication, the corporate governance structure of Turkish firms should be strengthened by new regulations taking into account the needs of Turkish firms and the nature of the business culture in the country.

This chapter is derived and developed from the unpublished PhD thesis “The Role of Corporate Governance on Earnings Management: Quarterly Evidence from Turkey”, submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Izmir University of Economics in December, 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In order to estimate quarterly discretionary accruals, the following models were employed; the Jones Model (Jones 1991), the Modified Jones Model (Dechow et al. 1995), the Adapted Model (Dechow et al. 2003), the Forward Looking Model (Dechow et al. 2003), the Kazsnik Model (Kazsnik 1999), the Larcker and Richardson Model (Larcker and Richardson 2004) and the Kothari et al. Model (Kothari et al. 2005). The Larcker and Richardson (2004) Model adjusted for the Adapted Model (Dechow et al. 2003) provides the most significant coefficient and highest adjusted-R2.

References

  • Ararat, M., Orbay, H., & Yurtoğlu, B. B. (2010). The effects of board independence in controlled firms, evidence from Turkey, (Working paper), [online]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 1663403. Accessed 20 Sept 2010.

  • Arslan, Ö., Karan, M. B., & Ekşi, C. (2010). Board structure and corporate performance. Managing Global Transitions, 8(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atik, A. (2009). Detecting income-smoothing behaviors of Turkish listed companies through empirical tests using discretionary accounting changes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayarlıoğlu, M. A. (2007). Kar Yönetimi Uygulamaları ve İstanbul Menkul Kiymetler Borsası’nda Test Edilmesi (Applications of earnings management and its detection in Istanbul Stock Exchange). Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Türkiye.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(2), 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsarı, Ç. K., Özkan, S., & Secer, C. (2009). Financial statement effects of adopting IFRS in Turkey: The mediating effect of inflation accounting. Journal of International Finance and Economics, 9(5), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors and financial report fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2003a). Corporate governance principles. [online]. http://www.spk.gov.tr/indexcont.aspx?action=showpage&menuid=10&pid=0. Accessed 09 July 2010.

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2003b) Communiqué on accounting standards in capital markets, (Serial: XI, No: 25), [online]. http://spk.gov.tr/apps/teblig/index.aspx?lang=T&submenuheader=-1. Accessed 07 Sept 2010.

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2004). Weekly bulletin numbered 2004/51. [online]. http://www.spk.gov.tr/apps/haftalikbulten/displaybulten.aspx?yil=2004&sayi=51&submenuheader=null. Accessed 11 Sept 2010.

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2006). Communiqué on independent auditing standards in capital markets, (Serial: X, No: 22), [online]. http://spk.gov.tr/apps/teblig/index.aspx?lang = T&submenuheader = -1. Accessed 07 Sept 2010.

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2008). Communiqué on principles for the financial reporting in capital markets, (Serial: XI, No: 29), [Online]. http://spk.gov.tr/apps/teblig/index.aspx?lang = T&submenuheader = -1. Accessed 07 Sept 2010.

  • Capital Markets Board (CMB). (2010). International economic and financial indicators June-2010. [online]. http://www.spk.gov.tr/indexcont.aspx?action=showpage&menuid=9&pid=2&submenuheader=-1. Accessed 11 Sept 2010.

  • Christie, A. A., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1994). Efficient and opportunistic choices of accounting procedures, corporate control contests. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 539–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2005). Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting and Finance, 45(2), 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 60(2), 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation, an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Review, 13(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2003). Why are earnings kinky? An examination of the earnings management explanation. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2–3), 355–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirag, I., & Serter, M. (2003). Ownership patterns and control in Turkish listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durukan, M. B., Özkan, S., & Dalkılıç, A. F. (2009). The effectiveness of the Turkish corporate governance system, CEO changes and performance measures, (Working paper), [online]. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1405251. Accessed 06 Oct 2009.

  • Elitaş, C., & Üç, M. (2009). The change on the foundations of the Turkish accounting system and the future perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(5), 674–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium, empirical tests. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Osma, B. (2006). Earnings quality, auditor monitoring and corporate governance mechanisms. Ph.D disseration, Lancaster University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S. L. (2006). Recent developments in corporate governance, an overview. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1988). One share-one vote and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacımahmutoğlu, S. (2007). The problems of minority protection and their solutions within the legal framework. Journal of Banking Regulation, 8(2), 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of International Finance (IIF). (2005). Corporate governance in Turkey, an investor perspective. [online]. www.goodprogram.org/docs/IIFCorpGovTurkey_0405.pdf. Accessed 01 Sept 2010.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeter, D. C., & Shivakumar, L. (1999). Cross-sectional estimation of abnormal accruals using quarterly and annual data, effectiveness in detecting event-specific earnings management. Accounting and Business Research, 29(4), 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. L., Krishnan, G. V., & Meleudrez, K. D. (2008). Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karacaer, S., & Özek, P. (2010). Denetim Firmasının Büyüklüğü ve Kâr Yönetimi İlişkisi: İMKB Şirketleri Üzerinde Ampirik Bir Araştırma. MUFAD Journal, 48, 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazsnik, R. (1999). On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 56–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 365–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 63–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D. F., & Richardson, S. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 625–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, C. W., & Comiskey, E. E. (2002). The financial numbers game, detecting creative accounting practices. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2000). Accrual management to meet earnings targets, UK evidence pre- and post-Cadbury. British Accounting Review, 32(4), 415–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, E. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7-8), 1311–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. Z. A., Butt, S. A., & Hasan, A. (2010). Corporate governance and earnings management an empirical evidence form Pakistani listed companies. European Journal of Scientific Research, 26(4), 624–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siregar, S. V., & Utama, S. (2008). Type of earnings management and the effect of ownership structure, firm size, and corporate governance practices: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugur, M., & Ararat, M. (2006). Does macroeconomic performance affect corporate governance? Evidence from Turkey. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(4), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, J. J. (1996). The audit committee and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11, 246–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (WEF). (2010). The global competitiveness report. [online]. http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-competitiveness. Accessed 03 Aug 2012.

  • World Federation of Exchanges (WFE). (2009). 2009 Annual reports and statistics. [online]. http://www.world-exchanges.org/files/statistics/pdf/WFE09%20final.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2010.

  • Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & Dadalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance, the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. S., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yükseltürk, O. (2006). İşletmelerde Kârı Yüksek Gösterme Yöntemleri ve Türkiye’de Hisse Senetlerinin Halka Arzı Öncesi Kârı Yüksek Gösterme Eğilimleri (Earning management methods and earnings management in companies performing initial public offerings in Turkey). Unpublished Ph.D thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Türkiye.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasemin Zengin Karaibrahimoğlu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karaibrahimoğlu, Y.Z. (2014). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Quarterly Evidence from Turkey. In: Idowu, S., Çaliyurt, K. (eds) Corporate Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45167-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics