Advertisement

Detection Method for Credibility Defect of Simulation Based on Sobol’ Method and Orthogonal Design

  • Zhong Zhang
  • Ke Fang
  • Fang Wu
  • Ming Yang
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 402)

Abstract

Against the defect detection problem of simulation credibility, a method based on Sobol’ method and orthogonal design is proposed. Firstly, taking acceptable range of simulation credibility as measurement standard, then credible indexes and incredible indexes of simulation system are determined. Secondly, experiment scheme is arranged according to an extended table transformed from orthogonal table, and incredible index’s defect rank is judged by experimental result analysis combining with membership function of defect rank. Thirdly, Latin Hypercube sampling is taken from relevant indexes of incredible index, and then sensitivity coefficients of relevant indexes are calculated using Sobol’ method. Finally an example is given to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords

simulation credibility defect detection Sobol’ method orthogonal design sampling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carson, J.S.: Introduction to Modeling and Simulation. In: Ingalls, R.G., Rossetti, M.D., Smith, J.S., Peters, B.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 7–13. IEEE Press, Orlando (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazilevs, Y., Hsu, M.C., Zhang, Y.: A Fully-Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Cerebral Aneurysms. Computational Mechanics 46(1), 3–16 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, W., Joos, G., Belanger, J.: Real-Time Simulation of a Wind Turbine Generator Coupled with a Battery Supercapacitor Energy Storage System. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 57(4), 1137–1145 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang, K., Wang, Z.C.: CES Net Method for Simulation System’s Credibility Evaluation. Control and Decision 26(5), 737–742 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parker, M.W., Shoop, S.A., Coutermarsh, B.A., Wesson, K.D., Stanley, J.M.: Verification and Validation of a Winter Driving Simulator. Journal of Terramechanics 46, 127–139 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robinson, S., Brooks, R.J.: Independent Verification and Validation of an Industrial Simulation Model. Simulation 86(7), 405–416 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, F., Yang, M.: An Optimal Design Method for Simulation Verification, Validation and Accreditation Schemes. Simulation 85(6), 375–386 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sobol, I.M.: On Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Matem Modelirovanie 2(1), 112–118 (1990)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong Zhang
    • 1
  • Ke Fang
    • 1
  • Fang Wu
    • 1
  • Ming Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Control and Simulation CenterHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations