Advertisement

Symbiotic Simulation for the Generation and Simulation of Incident Management Strategies

  • Vinh-An Vu
  • Giho Park
  • Gary Tan
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 402)

Abstract

Since its introduction in the Workshop on Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation in Dagstuhl 2002, Symbiotic Simulation has proven its versatility in many diverse areas ranging from manufacturing to pedestrian evacuation. This paper presents a new application of Symbiotic Simulation in the simulation and generation of traffic incident management strategies. The framework for the generation and evaluation of incident management strategies is used in which Symbiotic Simulation is the core technique of the Strategy Generation Module. Preliminary experimental result shows the effectiveness of Symbiotic Simulation in helping to simulate and select the best strategy to improve the traffic condition. Challenges are also highlighted with potential research direction.

Keywords

Incident Management Strategies Symbiotic Simulation Closed- Loop Framework 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mahmassani, H.: Dynamic Network Traffic Assignment and Simulation Methodology for Advanced System Management Applications. Networks and Spatial Economics 1(3-4), 267–292 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merchant, D.K., Nemhauster, G.L.: Optimal Conditions for a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model. Transportation Science 12(3), 202–207 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ran, B., Boyce, D.E., Leblanc, L.J.: A New Class of Instantaneous Dynamic User-Optimal Traffic Assignment Models. Operations Research 41(1), 192–202 (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, H.-K., Hsueh, C.F.: A Model and an Algorithm for the Dynamic User-Optimal Route Choice Problem. Transportation Research 32B(3), 219–234 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahmassani, H., Peeta, S.: System Optimal Dynamic Assignment for Electronic Route Guidance in a Congested Traffic Network. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Capri Seminar on Urban Traffic Networks, Capri, Italy (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Bottom, J., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Mishalani, R.: Development of a Route Guidance Generation System for Real-time Application. In: Preprints of the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS Symposium on Transportation Systems, pp. 433–439 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antoniou, C., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Ben-Akiva, M., Chauhan, A.S.: Evaluation of Diversion Strategies Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Transportation Planning and Technology 34(3), 199–216 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hegyi, A., De Schutter, B., Hellendoorn, J.: Model Predictive Control for Optimal Coordination of Ramp Metering and Variable Speed Limits. Transportation Research Part C 13(3), 185–209 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Messmer, A., Papageorgiou, M.: Automatic Control Methods Applied to Freeway Network Traffic. Automatica 30(4), 691–702 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ritchie, S.G.: A Knowledge-Based Decision Support Architecture for Advanced Traffic Management. Transportation Research Part A 24(1), 27–37 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, I., Chout, S.: Developing Adaptive Driving Route Guidance Systems Based on Fuzzy Neural Network. In: IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Seattle, Wa, USA, pp. 1–8 (July 2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park, K., Bell, M.G.H., Kaparias, I., Bogenberger, K.: Adaptive Route Choice Model for Intelligent Route Guidance Using a Rule-Based Approach. In: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2000, pp. 88–97. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adler, J.L., Satapathy, G., Manikonda, V., Bowles, B., Blue, V.J.: A Multi-Agent Approach to Cooperative Traffic Management and Route Guidance. Transportation Research 39B(4), 297–318 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujimoto, R., Lunceford, W.H., Page, E.H., Uhrmacher, A.: Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation: Dagstuhl Report. Technical Report 350, Seminar No. 02351, Schloss Dagstuhl (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Low, Y.H., Lye, K.W., Lendermann, P., Turner, S.J., Leo, S., Chin, R.: An Agent-Based Approach for Managing Symbiotic Simulation of Semiconductor Assembly and Test Operations. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Autonomous Agent and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-29 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hetu, S., Tan, G.: Potential Benefits of Symbiotic Simulation to Pedestrian Evacuation. In: 2009 Asia Simulation Conference. Japan Society for Simulation Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kamrani, F., Ayani, R.: Using Online Simulation for Adaptive Path Planning of UAVs. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-time Applications, Chania, Greece, pp. 167–174 (October 2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aydt, H., Lees, M., Knoll, A.: Symbiotic Simulation for Future Electro-Mobility Transportation Systems. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vu, V.-A., Park, G., Tan, G., Ben-Akiva, M.: A Framework for the Generation and Evaluation of Incident Management Strategies. Submitted to the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinh-An Vu
    • 1
  • Giho Park
    • 2
  • Gary Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, School of ComputingNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Future Urban Mobility Interdisciplinary Research GroupSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and TechnologySingapore

Personalised recommendations