Advertisement

Reliability Analysis Method Using Dynamic Reliability Block Diagram Based on DEVS Formalism

  • Sol Ha
  • Namkug Ku
  • Myung-Il Roh
  • Ju-Hwan Cha
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 402)

Abstract

This paper adopted the system configuration to assess the reliability of a target system instead of making a fault tree (FT), which is a traditional method to analyze reliability of a certain system; this is the reliability block diagram (RBD) method. The RBD method is a graphical presentation of a system diagram connecting the subsystems of components according to their functions or reliability relationships. The equipment model for the reliability simulation is modeled based on the discrete event system specification (DEVS) formalism.

Keywords

Reliability analysis dynamic reliability block diagram DEVS(Discrete Event System Specification) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bang, K.W.: Combined discrete event and discrete time simulation framework for shipbuilding process planning. Master Thesis, Seoul National University (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., Ciancamerla, E.: Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71(3), 249–260 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, M.A.: Dynamic Fault Tree Models: Techniques for Analysis of Advanced Fault-Tolerant Computer Systems. Doctoral Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Duke Univ. (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cha, J.H., Lee, K.Y., Ham, S.H., Roh, M.I., Park, K.P., Suh, H.W.: Discrete event/discrete time simulation of block erection by a floating crane based on multibody system dynamics. In: Proceedings of 19th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), pp. 678–685. Osaka International Convention Center, Osaka (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, K.P., Rausand, M., Vatn, J.: Reliability assessment of reliquefaction systems on LNG carriers. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93(9), 1345–1353 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Distefano, S., Puliafito, A.: Dependability evaluation with dynamic reliability block diagrams and dynamic fault trees. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 6(1), 4–17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stamatelatos, M.: Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications Version 1.1 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault tree handbook, NUREG-0492, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zeigler, B.P.: Object-oriented simulation with hierarchical, modular models. Academic Press, Inc. (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zeigler, B.P., Praehofer, H., Kim, T.G.: Theory of modeling and simulation. Academic Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sol Ha
    • 1
  • Namkug Ku
    • 1
  • Myung-Il Roh
    • 2
  • Ju-Hwan Cha
    • 3
  1. 1.Engineering Research InstituteSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Ocean EngineeringMokpo National UniversityMuan-gunSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations