Abstract
Emerging economies are characterized by a reduced level of transparency and accountability of their business environment. Previous research on corporate governance practices in these economies has highlighted the difficulties of implementing corporate governance codes, the reduced level of compliance with these codes and the reluctance of local businesses to change the manner in which they are managed. In this context, multinational corporations (MNCs) are often perceived as “knowledge transfer” agents contributing to the improvement of local practices. However, the transfer is not unilateral, but it should be rather seen as a process of mutual transformation and adaptation. The aim of this chapter is to investigate the role of multinationals in improving corporate governance practices in emerging economies. We conduct a case study on the privatization of Petrom, the largest company listed on the Romania's Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE). The case suggests that the alignment of Petrom’s practices with the new owner’s (Austrian company OMV) vision and strategy, besides contributing to superior performance and accountability of the company itself, led to a significant improvement of the local corporate governance. This is a story of successful privatization which sheds light on the mechanisms of globalization and on how economic progress is obtained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
With freedom of movement, the MNCs might be tempted to choose the less restrictive settings, from an employee protection point of view (e.g. the case of Viking, and Laval in EU).
References
Abe, N., & Iwasaki, I. (2010). Organisational culture and corporate governance in Russia: A study of managerial turnover. Post-Communist Economies, 22(4), 449–470.
Aguilera, R. V., & Yip, G. S. (2004). Corporate governance and globalization: Toward an actor-centered institutional analysis. In A. Arin, P. Ghemawat, & J. E. Ricard (Eds.), Creating value through international strategy (pp. 55–77). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Albu, N., Albu, C. N., Bunea, S., Calu, D. A., & Gîrbină, M. M. (2011). A story about IAS/IFRS implementation in Romania – An institutional and structuration theory perspective. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(1), 76–100.
Annual Report. (2004). Petrom’s annual report. http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Raport_Anual. Accessed 12 June 2010.
Annual Report. (2005). Petrom’s annual report. http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Raport_Anual. Accessed 12 June 2010.
Annual Report. (2006). Petrom’s annual report. http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Raport_Anual. Accessed 12 June 2010.
Annual Report. (2007). Petrom’s annual report. http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Raport_Anual. Accessed 7 May 2011.
Becht, M., Bolton, P., & Röell, A. (2005). Corporate governance and control. ECGI Working paper series in, Finance, 2, www.ecgi.org/wp. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.
Black, B. S., de Carvalho, A. G., & Gorga, E. (2012). What matters and for which firms for corporate governance in emerging markets? Evidence from Brazil (and other BRIK countries). Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 934–952.
Boytsun, A., Deloof, M., & Matthyssens, P. (2011). Social norms, social cohesion, and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(1), 41–60.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Pohl, G. (1997). Ownership and corporate governance. Evidence from the Czech Republic. Policy Research Working Paper 1737. World Bank.
Cojocar, A. (2013) Industria trece printr-un val de închideri care afectează creşterea economică. Care sunt cauzele dezindustrializării de după’89 şi unde s-a greşit? Am privatizat prea mult sau prea puţin? De ce nu am atras destui noi investitori? (in Romanian) [The industry undergoes a wave of shut-downs which affect the economic growth. What are the causes of de-industrialization after’89 and what went wrong? Have we privatized too much or not enough? Why did we not attract more investors?], Ziarul Financiar, 7 Mar 2013.
Corporate News. (2005). Petrom corporate news, 26 May 2005. http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Relatia_cu_investitorii/Noutati_investitori/Noutati_investitori_2005. Accessed 11 Dec 2008.
Corporate News. (2006). Petrom launches a new line of fuels [10 Apr 2006], http://www.petrom.com/portal/01/petromcom/petromcom/Petrom/Biroul_de_presa/Arhiva_presa/Arhiva_2006. Accessed on 2 Feb 2008.
Costello, A. O., & Costello, T. G. (2004). Corporate governance in multinational corporations. Midwest Academy of Management annual conference, Minneapolis.
Cuc, S., & Kanya, H. (2009). Corporate governance – A transparency index for the Romanian listed companies. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2(1), 60–66.
Curentul. (2006). Garda Naţională de Mediu "arde" Petromul [in Romanian]. http://www.curentul.ro/curentul.php?numar=20061020&cat=7&subcat=100&subart=45534. Accessed 15 June 2011.
Denisova, I., Eller, M., Frye, T., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2012). Everyone hates privatization, but why? Survey evidence from 28 post-communist countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(1), 44–61.
Djankov, S., & Murrell, P. (2002). Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 739–792.
Dyck, A. (2001). Privatization and corporate governance: Principles, evidence, and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 59–84.
Earle, J. S., & Sapatoru, D. (1994). Incentive contracts, corporate governance, and privatization funds in Romania. Atlantic Economic Journal, 22(2), 61–79.
Ezzamel, M., & Xiao, J. (2011). Accounting in transitional and emerging market economies. European Accounting Review, 20(4), 625–637.
Gołębiowska-Tataj, D., & Klonowski, D. (2009). When East meets West: corporate governance challenges in emerging markets of Central and Eastern Europe – The case of Polish Aggregate Processors. Post-Communist Economies, 21(3), 361–371.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Lupu (Ioan), I., & Sandu, R. (2010). Legitimacy strategies in the annual reports – What turn to social responsibility in post-privatization context. 33rd European Accounting Association (EAA) Annual Congress, Istanbul [working paper].
Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–389.
Mennicken, A. (2008). Connecting worlds: The translation of international auditing standards into post-Soviet audit practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 384–414.
Mickiewicz, T. M. (2009). Hierarchy of governance institutions and the pecking order of privatization: Central-Eastern Europe and Central Asia reconsidered. Post-Communist Economies, 21(4), 399–423.
Moilanen, S. (2007). Knowledge translation in management accounting and control: A case study of a multinational firm in transitional economies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 757–789.
Olimid, L., Ionaşcu, M., Popescu, L., & Daniel, V. (2009). Corporate governance in Romania. A fragile start. The Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, Athens, 5–6 Nov 2009.
Omran, M. (2009). Post-privatization corporate governance and firm performance: The role of private ownership concentration, identity and board composition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 658–673.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.
Przybyłowski, M., Aluchna, M., & Zamojska, A. (2011). Role of independent supervisory board members in Central and Eastern European countries. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 8(1), 77–98.
Rahman, M. (2009). Corporate governance in the European Union: Firm nationality and the ‘German’ model. Multinational Business Review, 17(4), 77–98.
Răileanu, A. S., Dobroţeanu, C. L., & Dobroţeanu, L. (2011). Probleme de actualitate cu privire la măsurarea nivelului de guvernanţă corporativă în România (in Romanian) [Current issues in measuring the level of corporate governance in Romania]. Audit Financiar, 2011(1), 11–15.
Rondinelli, D. A. (2002, Winter). Transnational corporations: International citizens or new sovereigns? Business and Society Review, 107(4), 391–413.
Rugraff, E., & Hansen, M. W. (2011). Multinational corporations and local firms in emerging economies: An introduction. In E. Rugraff & M. W. Hansen (Eds.), Multinational corporations and local firms in emerging economies (pp. 13–47). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). Foreword. In G. Roland (Ed.), Privatization: Successes and failures. New York: Columbia University Press.
Young, P. T. (2010). Captured by business? Romanian market governance and the new economic elite. Business and Politics, 12(1), 1–38.
Ziarul Financiar. (2007). Petrom: The closing down of the refinery won’t have a major impact on the results, 30 May 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albu, N., Lupu, I., Sandu, R. (2014). Multinationals as Vectors of Corporate Governance Improvement in Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe: A Case Study. In: Boubaker, S., Nguyen, D. (eds) Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44955-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44955-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-44954-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-44955-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)