Advertisement

Corporate Governance Development in a Rapidly Changing Economy: Trends and Challenges in Estonia

  • Ruth Alas
  • Tiit Elenurm
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Implications of the Estonian privatization and the two-tier board model on corporate governance development are discussed. Despite implementing OECD corporate governance guidelines the stock market has still limited role in Estonian economy. The chapter reflects empirical research conducted at the Estonian Business School in the field of corporate governance at different stages of Estonian integration to the European Union and in the change management context. Technology-based new ventures create situations, where entrepreneurs are choosing new owners able to offer smart capital. These examples cannot be fully explained by applying the traditional principal-agent logic. Cases presented by participants of training workshops highlight conflicts between owners with different future vision and difficulties of entrepreneurs to differentiate the role of corporate governance from the daily management of business operations.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Supervisory Board Small Open Economy Management Board Limited Liability Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alas, R., & Tafel, K. (2008). Corporate governance in Estonia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(1), 296–302.Google Scholar
  2. Alas, R., Elenurm, T., & Tafel-Viia, K. (2010a). Who is driving the change? Corporate governance and organizational change in Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 41(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alas, R., Gao, J., & Vanhala, S. (2010b). The crisis management in Chinese and Estonian organizations. Chinese Management Studies, 4(1), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, M., & Aldred, M. (2011). Varieties of capitalism, governance, and high-tech export performance. Employee Relations, 33(4), 334–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andres, C. (2008). Large shareholders and firm performance: An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedo, Z., Demirbag, M., & Wood, G. (2011). Introducing governance and employment relations in Eastern and Central Europe. Employee Relations, 33(4), 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bistrova, J., & Lace, N. (2012). Quality of corporate governance system and quality of reported earnings: Evidence from CEE companies. Economics and Management, 17(1), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cvelbar, L. K. (2007). The relationship between supervisory board structure and CEO turnover: The empirical evidence of Slovenia’. Nase Gospodarstvo, 5(6), 53–62.Google Scholar
  10. Eamets, R., Mygind, N., & Spitsa, N. (2008). The development of employee financial participation in Estonia. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(2), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elenurm, T., Terk, E., & Andresoo, J. (2008). Cooperation patterns between capital owners and managers in the strategic management process. Case Estonia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 8(5), 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estrin, S. (1994). Privatization in the transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe – Issues and progress. Business Strategy Review, 5(4), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Estrin, S. (2002). Competition and corporate governance in transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Filatotcev, I., Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. (2008). Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1133–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Financial Supervision Authority. (2005). Corporate governance recommendations. http://www.nasdaqomxbaltic.com/files/tallinn/bors/press/HYT_eng.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2013.
  16. Foo, J., & Witkowska, D. (2011). The role of corporate governance in transition countries. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance, Economic Sciences, 1(2), 43–53.Google Scholar
  17. Frankel, J. (2012). What small countries can teach to the World. Business Economics, 47, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fromlet, H. (2012). Predictability of financial crises: Lessons from Sweden to other countries. Business Economics, 47, 262–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerndorf, K., Elenurm, T., & Terk, E. (1999). Corporate governance in Estonia, OECD (homepage). www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/36/1931752.pdf, Accessed 6 June 2013.
  20. Hannula, H. (2006). Identifying patterns in ownership changes and their implications for enterprise: Restructuring in the Estonian manufacturing sector. EBS Review, 1(21), 76–93.Google Scholar
  21. Hardi, P., & Buti, K. (2012). Corporate governance variables: Lessons from a holistic approach to Central-Eastern European practice. Corporate Governance, 12(1), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodbari, B., Jones, D. C., & Mygind, N. (2010). Corporate governance and liquidity constraints: A dynamic analysis. Comparative Economic Studies, 52, 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, D. C., Kalmi, P., & Mygind, N. (2003). Choice of ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Estonia (Vol. 7). Helsinki: Bank of Finland, Institute for Economics in Transition.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make competition irrelevant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kooskora, M. (2008). Corporate governance from the stakeholder perspective, in the context of Estonian business organizations. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(2), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuznetsov, A., & Kuznetsova, O. (2012). Business legitimacy and the margins of corporate social responsibility in the Russian context. International Studies of Management and Organization, 42(3), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mainela, T., & Puhakka, V. (2011). Role for networks in emergence of international new ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 3(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maly, M. (2006). Board structure and competencies after mass privatization – The case of the Czech Republic. EBS Review, 1(21), 117–125.Google Scholar
  29. Martynova, M., & Renneboog, L. D. R. (2011). Evidence on the international evolution and convergence of corporate governance regulations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1531–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2011). Corporate governance in Estonia 2011. Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing. doi.org/10.1787/9789264119079-en
  32. Raadik, A. (2008). Investors’ and issuers’ awareness of the corporate governance recommendations. Master’s Thesis, Estonian Business School.Google Scholar
  33. Ramdani, D., & Witteloostuijn, A. (2012). The shareholder-manager relationship and its impact on the likelihood of firm bribery. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rozman, R. (2006). Some organizational corporate governance issues in Slovenian enterprises. EBS Review, 1(21), 104–116.Google Scholar
  35. Sapriel, C. (2003). Effective crisis management: Tools and best practices for the new millennium. Journal of communication management, 7(4), 348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Steger, T., Tafel, K., & Alas, R. (2006). Good corporate governance in transition countries – A comparison of experts’ perceptions in East Germany, Estonia and Hungary. Berlin: IFSAM VIIIth World Congress. http://www.ctw-congress.de/ifsam/download/track_8/pap00719.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013.
  38. Tafel, K., Terk, E., & Purju, A. (2006). Corporate governance in post-socialist countries – Theoretical dilemmas, peculiarities, research opportunities. EBS Review, 1(21), 7–26.Google Scholar
  39. Tafel-Viia, K., & Alas, R. (2009). Differences and conflicts between owners and top managers in the context of social responsibility. Engineering Economics, 4(64), 86–94.Google Scholar
  40. Terk, E. (2000). Privatisation in Estonia: Ideas, process, results. Tallinn: ETI Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Terk, E., & Elenurm, T. (1996). Employee ownership in Estonia. Conclusions from case studies. In N. Mygind & P. N. Pedersen (Eds.), Privatization and financial participation in the Baltic countries. Case studies (pp. 1–15). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  42. Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2007). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Estonian Business SchoolTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations