Advertisement

A Method to Deal with Prospective Risks at Home in Robotic Observations by Using a Brain-Inspired Model

  • David Chik
  • Gyanendra Nath Tripathi
  • Hiroaki Wagatsuma
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8228)

Abstract

Home robotics is a continuously growing field in academic research as well as commercial market. People are becoming more interested in advanced intelligent robots that can do housework and take care of children and elderly. A brain-inspired intelligent system is a possible solution to make the robot capable of learning and predicting risks at home. In order to solve difficult problems such as ambiguous situations and unclear causality, we propose a robotic system inspired from human working memory functions, which consists of an Event Map for storing observed information, and a Causality Map for representing causal relationships through supervised learning. The two maps couple together to enable the robot to evaluate various situations based on the appropriate context. More importantly, the Causality Map takes into account the dynamical aspects of physical attributes (e.g. the decreasing temperature of a hot pot). Our case studies showed that this is a satisfactory solution for predicting many risky situations at home.

Keywords

Home robotics brain-inspired intelligent system risk management causality learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gates, B.: A robot in every home. Scientific American 296(1), 58–65 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lovgren, S.: A Robot in Every Home by 2020, South Korea Says. National Geographic News (September 2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaneko, R., Ishikawa, A., Ishii, F., Sasai, T., Iwasawa, M., Mita, F., Moriizumi, R.: Population projections for Japan: 2006-2055, outline of results, methods, and assumptions. The Japanese Journal of Population 6, 76–114 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagaraja, J., Menkedick, J., Phelan, K.J., Ashley, P., Zhang, X.L., Lanphear, B.P.: Deaths from residential injuries in US children and adolescents, 1985-1997. Pediatrics 116, 454–461 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3), 424–438 (1969)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winkler, R.L.: Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision, 2nd edn. Probabilistic Publishing (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    LeDoux, J.: The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon & Schuster Ltd. (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janowsky, J.S., Shimamura, A.P., Squire, L.R.: Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 27, 1043–1056 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wunderlich, K., Beierholm, U.R., Bossaerts, P., O’Doherty, J.P.: The human prefrontal cortex mediates integration of potential causes behind observed outcomes. Journal of Neurophysiology 106, 1558–1569 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buehner, M., Krumm, S., Pick, M.: Reasoning = working memory ≠ attention. Intelligence 33, 251–272 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy, J., Patrick, H.: Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4, 463–502 (1969)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hilborn, R.C.: Sea gulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: A brief history of the butterfly effect in nonlinear dynamics. American Journal of Physics 72(4), 425–427 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schyns, P.G., Goldstone, R.L., Thibaut, J.-P.: The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 1–54 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, W., Linden, D.J.: The other side of the engram: experience-driven changes in neuronal intrinsic excitability. Nature Review Neuroscience 4, 885–900 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modis, T.: The normal, the natural, and the harmonic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(3), 391–398 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carvalho, J.P., Tomé, J.A.B.: Rule based fuzzy cognitive maps - fuzzy causal relations. In: CIMCA 1999 - Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation, Viena, Austria (March 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Chik
    • 1
  • Gyanendra Nath Tripathi
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Wagatsuma
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Brain Science and EngineeringKyushu Institute of TechnologyKitakyushuJapan
  2. 2.RIKEN BSIJapan

Personalised recommendations