Minimization of Numerical Dispersion Errors in Finite Element Models of Non-homogeneous Waveguides

  • Andrius Krisciunas
  • Rimantas Barauskas
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 403)


The paper presents the approach for the reduction of numerical errors, which are inherent for simulations based on wave propagation models in discrete meshes. The discrete computational models always tend to generate errors of harmonic wave propagation velocities in higher frequency ranges, which can be treated as numerically-induced errors of dispersion curves. The result of the errors is the deterioration of the shapes of simulated waves as the time of simulation increases. The presented approach is based on the improvement of the matrices of elements of the finite element model by means of correction of the modal frequencies and modal shapes of an individual element. The approach developed by the authors earlier and proved to work in the case of a uniform waveguide now has been demonstrated to be valid for simulations of waves in networks of waveguides. The non-reflecting boundary conditions can be implemented by combining synthesized and lumped mass elements in the same model. The propagating wave pulses can be satisfactorily simulated in comparatively rough meshes, where only 6-7 finite elements per wavelength are used.


finite elements wave propagation modal synthesis modal errors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mullen, R., Belytschko, T.: Dispersion analysis properties of finite element semi-discretizations of the two-dimensional wave equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 18, 1–29 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barauskas, R., Barauskiene, R.: Highly convergent dynamic models obtained by modal synthesis with application to short wave pulse propagation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 61(14), 2536–2554 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barauskas, R.: On highly convergent 2D acoustic and elastic wave propagation models. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 22(3), 225–233 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolf, J.P., Song, C.: Finite-element modelling of unbounded media. Wiley, Chichester (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shu, J.-J.: A finite element model and electronic analogue of pipeline pressure transients with frequency-dependent friction. Journal of Fluids Engineering 125(1), 194–199 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kochupillai, J., Ganesan, N., Padmanabhan, C.: A new finite element formulation based on the velocity of flow for water hammer problems. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 82(1), 1–14 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osiadacz, A.J.: Different Transient Flow Models-Limitations, Advantages, And Disadvantages. In: PSIG Annual Meeting (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrius Krisciunas
    • 1
  • Rimantas Barauskas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of System AnalysisKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations