Abstract
The conceptual modelling community not only has no clear, general agreement on what its models model, it also has no clear picture of what the available options and their implications are. One common claim is that models represent concepts, but there is no clear articulation of what the concepts are. This creates theoretical problems; for example, it is difficult to justify the accuracy of meta-models. It also creates practical problems; practitioners building a model of the ‘concept’ of a business will rationalise their decisions differently from those modelling the business itself, making resolving disagreement difficult. In contrast, philosophy has been researching this area for millennia and has developed, at the high level, a clear picture of the semantic landscape, particularly for concepts. This presents an opportunity to provide the conceptual modelling community with a ready-made framework for its semantic options. We start exploiting this opportunity, developing here an initial framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Partridge, C.: Business Objects: Re - Engineering for Re - Use. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford (1996)
Smith, B.: Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), pp. 73–84. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models, CTIT PhD Thesis Series, no. 05-74 (2005)
Mylopoulos, J.: Conceptual Modelling and Telos. In: Loucopoulos, P., Zicari, R. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and Case: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development, pp. 49–68. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1992)
Lycett, M., Partridge, C.: The Challenge of Epistemic Divergence in IS Development. Commun. ACM 52, 127–131 (2009)
Lewis, D.: General Semantics. Synthese 22, 18–67 (1970)
Frege, G.: Conceptual Notation, and Related Articles. Oxford Scholarly Classics. Clarendon Press (1972)
Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1932)
Wieringa, R.: Real-World Semantics of Conceptual Models. In: Kaschek, R., Delcambre, L. (eds.) The Evolution of Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 6520, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
ISO: ISO 1087-1:2000 - Terminology Work – Vocabulary – Part 1: Theory and Application 41 (2000)
ISO: ISO 704:2009 Terminology work–Principles and Methods. International Organization for Standardization 65 (2000)
Wand, Y., Storey, V.C., Weber, R.: An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Construct in Conceptual Modeling. TODS 24, 494–528 (1999)
Henderson-Sellers, B., Eriksson, O., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Ã…gerfalk, P.J.: Ptolemaic Metamodelling? The Need for a Paradigm Shift. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Sturm, A., Clark, T., Cohen, S., Bettin, J. (eds.) Research Directions in Domain Engineering. Springer, Berlin (in press, 2013)
Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A.: The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, Harcourt, Brace, New York (1923)
Aristotle: The Categories; on Interpretation. Harvard University Press; W. Heinemann, Cambridge, Mass. London (1983)
Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1975) (First published 1690)
Dummett, M.: The Seas of Language. Clarendon press, Oxford (1993)
Frege, G.: Über Sinn Und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50 (1892)
Davis, W.A.: Meaning, Expression and Thought. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Carruthers, P.: Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Pinker, S.: The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. Penguin, London (1995)
Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. John Noon, London (1739)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (1953)
Partridge, C., Lambert, M., Loneragan, M., Mitchell, A., Garbacz, P.: A Novel Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability between Legacy Air Defence Command and Control Systems. International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems 4, 232–262 (2011)
Peacocke, C.: Rationale and Maxims in the Study of Concepts. Noûs 39, 167–178 (2005)
Peacocke, C.: A Study of Concepts. Representation and Mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Field, H.H.: Science without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1980)
Benacerraf, P.: Mathematical Truth. The Journal of Philosophy 70(19), 661–679 (1973)
Yablo, S.: Go Figure: A Path through Fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25, 72–102 (2001)
Clark, A.: Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)
Goldman, A.I.: Foundations of Social Epistemics. Synthese 73, 109–144 (1987)
Kaschek, R.: A Little Theory of Abstraction. In: Proceedings of Modellierung 2004, pp. 75–92. Gesellschaft fűr Informatik, Bonn (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Partridge, C., Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B. (2013). Are Conceptual Models Concept Models? . In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8217. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41923-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41924-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)