Skip to main content

Products and Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Transformation

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 3086 Accesses

Abstract

Products and processes are the fundamental building blocks of a company’s operations, and they play a major role in determining the competitive positioning of a company. A product can be conceptualized as a bundle of attributes. Each such bundle is a version of the product and, the set of versions of a product offered by a manufacturing company is the product-variety. While the attributes of quality and customization are stipulated by the customer, others such as technology, manufacturing processes, components, logistics, and postponement are controlled by the manufacturer along with the distributor and retailer. Product realization requires processes: manufacturing, and services. They are the steps by which value is added to satisfy the expectations of customers. Processes transform inputs (actions, methods, and operations) into outputs (products). They interact with other processes in the supply chain, as outputs from one process become the inputs to another. Each process is therefore part of a larger process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balakrishnan, N., & Chakravarty, A. (1996). Managing engineering change: Market opportunities and manufacturing costs. Production and Operations Management, 5, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidsar, K. (2012). Future Volkswagen MQB platform unveiled – All VW cars to be built on this platform. http://www.carblogindia.com/volkswagen-mqb-flexible-platform-revealed/

  • Carloni, L., Bernardinis, F., Pinello, C., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A., & Sgroi, M. (2000). Platform-based design for embedded systems. http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~luca/research/pbdes.pdf

  • Chakravarty, A. (2010). Market driven manufacturing. Boston: Now Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., & Balakrishnan, N. (2001). Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations. IIE Transactions, 33, 587–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, L. (2001, March 5). Nissan’s solution: Modules. Automotive News, Issue 5919

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., & Short, J. (1990, July 15). The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review – Magazine. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-new-industrial-engineering-information-technology-and-business-process-redesign/

  • Diez, J. (2000). Innovative networks in manufacturing: Some empirical evidence from the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Technovation, 20, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitzinger, E., & Lee, H. (1996, January–February). Mass customization at Hewlett Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Business Review, 116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, T., & Zhang, F. (2013). The impact of modular assembly on supply chain efficiency. Production and Operations Management. doi:10.1111/poms.12182. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/poms.12182/full

  • Fine, C., & Whitney, D. (1996). Is the make-buy decision process a core competence (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H., Golany, B., & Naseraldin, H. (2005). Modeling tradeoffs on three dimensional concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your products. Harvard Business Review, 75, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., Ramdas, K., & Ulrich, K. (1999). Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive banking systems. Management Science, 45, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Krishnan, V. (1998). Integrated component and supplier selection for a product family. Production and Operations Management, 8(2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. (2001, September). The superefficient company. Harvard Business Review, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D., Lopez, E., & Lee, H. (2007). Lucent technologies: Provisioning and postponement, Case: GS-02. Stanford Graduate School of Business. Stanford University. Palo Alto, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • HP (2002). Inventory optimization for product rollover. HP Invent. ftp://15.217.49.75/pub/services/erp/info/hp_lab_iop.pdf

  • Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G., Kotler, P., & Moorthy K. (1992). Marketing models, Chapter 2, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack, A., Newmann, L., & Rosenfield, D. (1994). The new dynamics of global manufacturing site location. Sloan Management Review, 35, 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, E., Chengand, Y., & Liangsiri, J. (2008). Means for transferring knowledge in the relocation of manufacturing units. http://www2.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/cim/symposium2008/08proceedings/10%20-%20Erik%20Skov%20Madsen%20et%20al.pdf

  • McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf

  • Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2002). Product architecture and platforms: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 24, 1–16. http://www.csun.edu/~rsh12598/415/additional/MSE-415%20Reading3.pdf.

  • Piezunka, H. (2011). Technological platforms – An assessment of the primary types of technological platforms, their strategic issues and their linkages to organizational theory. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 61, 179–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires, S., Guarnieri, E., Neto, M., & daSilva, E. (2012). A supplier’s restructuring process to become a “Systemist” within a new automotive industrial condominium. http://www.pom2012.org/fullpapers/add199978_yJtd7bZw0r.doc.pdf

  • Pisano, G. P. (1994). ITT automotive: Global manufacturing strategies, Case 9-695-002. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, T., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product variety supply chain structure, and firm performance: Analysis of the U.S. bicycle industry. Management Science, 47, 1588–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998). Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, 19–31, Summer

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman. Research Policy, 24, 761–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E. (1990). The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E., Weck, O., & Chang, D. (2007). Flexible product platforms: Framework and case study. Research in Engineering Design, 18, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A., & Fujimoto, T. (2001). Modularization in the auto industry: Interlinked multiple hierarchies of product production and supplier systems. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2009). Managing new product development and supply chain risks: The Boeing 787 case. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 10, 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24, 19–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S. (1995). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdouw, C., Beulens, A., Trienekens, J., & Verwaart, T. (2010). Mastering demand and supply uncertainty with combined product and process configuration. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuuren, V., & Halman, J. (2001). Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice (Working Paper 01.06). Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology. http://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/books/551507.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., Allen, J., Rosen, D., & Mistree, F. (2007). Designing platforms for customizable products and processes in markets of non-uniform demand. Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/32890/CBW.CERA07.DRAFT.pdf?sequence=1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakravarty, A.K. (2014). Products and Processes. In: Supply Chain Transformation. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41911-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics