Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coronary Artery Stents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cardiac CT

  • 2115 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter details the demands on coronary artery stent CT angiography and the typical challenges when reading these datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  • Beohar N, Davidson CJ, Kip KE et al (2007) Outcomes and complications associated with off-label and untested use of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 297:1992–2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al (2007) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2204–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebersberger U, Tricarico F, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol 23:125–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:951–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J, PROGRESS-AMS (Clinical Performance and Angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting with Absorbable Metal Stents) Investigators et al (2007) Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 18:217–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagei P (2009) Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 103:1675–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lell MM, Panknin C, Saleh R et al (2007) Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT). Invest Radiol 42:536–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE et al (2004) Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 39:27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T et al (2005) Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40:8–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H et al (2009) Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 19:42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, RAVEL Study Group et al (2002) Randomized study with the sirolimus-coated Bx velocity balloon- expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus- eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 346:1773–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, SIRIUS Investigators et al (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315–1323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B (2008) Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharitar S, Serruys PW (2008) Fully biodegradable coronary stents: progress to date. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 8:305–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567–2572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schepis T, Koepfli P, Leschka S et al (2007) Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 17:1464–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser T, Scheuermann T, Ulzheimer S et al (2007) In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner. Clin Res Cardiol 96:883–890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW et al (2007) Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology 245:416–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R et al (2006) 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 41:22–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Serruys PW, Ormiston JA, Onuma Y et al (2009) A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods. Lancet 373:897–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH (2009) Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 69:489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoenacker PK, Decramer I, Bladt O et al (2008) Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Review BMC Med Imaging 8:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S et al (2006) Randomized doubleblind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2423–2431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, DELAYED RRISC (Death and Events at Long-term follow-up AnalYsis: Extended Duration of the Reduction of Restenosis In Saphenous vein grafts with Cypher stent) Investigators et al (2007) Increased late mortality after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diseased saphenous vein grafts: results from the randomized DELAYED RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:261–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veselka J, Cadova P, Tomasov P et al (2011) Dual-source CT angiography for detection and quantification of in-stent restenosis in the left main coronary artery: comparison with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 23:460–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Win HK, Caldera AE, Maresh K, EVENT Registry Investigators et al (2007) Clinical outcomes and stent thrombosis following off-label use of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 297:2001–2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    K. Anders Priv.-Doz. Dr. med.

Authors
  1. K. Anders Priv.-Doz. Dr. med.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Anders Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anders, K. (2014). Coronary Artery Stents. In: Cardiac CT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41883-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41883-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41882-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41883-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation