Image Segmentation Using Active Contours and Evidential Distance

  • Foued Derraz
  • Antonio Pinti
  • Miloud Boussahla
  • Laurent Peyrodie
  • Hechmi Toumi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8258)

Abstract

We proposed a new segmentation based on Active Contours (AC) for vector-valued image that incorporates evidential distance. The proposed method combine both Belief Functions (BFs) and probability functions in the Bhattacharyya distance framework. This formulation allows all features issued from vector-valued image and guide the evolution of AC using an inside/outside descriptor. The imprecision caused by the variation of the contrast issued from the multiple channels is incorporated in the BFs as weighted parameters. We demonstrated the performance of the proposed algorithm using some challenging color biomedical images.

Keywords

Active Contours Characteristic function Belief Function Bhattacharyya distance Dempster Shafer rule 

References

  1. 1.
    Appriou, A.: Generic approach of the uncertainty management in multisensor fusion processes. Revue Traitement du Signal 22(2), 307–319 (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bresson, X., Esedoglu, S., Vandergheynst, P., Thiran, J.P., Osher, S.: Fast global minimization of the active contour/snake model. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 28(2), 151–167 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan, T.F., Sandberg, B.Y., Vese, L.A.: Active contours without edges for vector-valued images. Journal of Vis. Communi. and Image Repres. 11, 130–141 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cremers, D., Rousson, M., Deriche, R.: A review of statistical approaches to level set segmentation: Integrating color, texture, motion and shape. Int. J. Comput. Vision 72(2), 195–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuzzolin, F.: A geometric approach to the theory of evidence. IEEE Trans. on Syst., Man, and Cyber., Part C 38(4), 522–534 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vylder, J., Rooms, F., Philips, W.: Convex formulation and global optimization for multimodal active contour segmentation. In: 2011 7th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), pp. 165–170 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dempster, A.P., Chiu, W.F.: Dempster-shafer models for object recognition and classification. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 21(3), 283–297 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denoeux, T.: Maximum likelihood estimation from uncertain data in the belief function framework. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 119–130 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derraz, F., Taleb-Ahmed, A., Pinti, A., Peyrodie, L., Betrouni, N., Chikh, A., Bereksi-Reguig, F.: Fast unsupervised texture segmentation using active contours model driven by bhattacharyya gradient flow. In: Bayro-Corrochano, E., Eklundh, J.-O. (eds.) CIARP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5856, pp. 193–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldstein, T., Bresson, X., Osher, S.: Geometric applications of the split bregman method: Segmentation and surface reconstruction. J. Sci. Comput. 45(1-3), 272–293 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldstein, T., Osher, S.: The split bregman method for l1-regularized problems. SIAM J. Img. Sci. 2(2), 323–343 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lelandais, B., Gardin, I., Mouchard, L., Vera, P., Ruan, S.: Using belief function theory to deal with uncertainties and imprecisions in image processing. In: Denœux, T., Masson, M.-H. (eds.) Belief Functions: Theory & Appl. AISC, vol. 164, pp. 197–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, D.R., Fowlkes, C.C., Malik, J.: Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(5), 530–549 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masson, M.-H., Denoeux, T.: Ecm: An evidential version of the fuzzy c. Pattern Recognition 41(4), 1384–1397 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michailovich, O., Rathi, Y., Tannenbaum, A.: Image segmentation using active contours driven by the bhattacharyya gradient flow. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16(11), 2787–2801 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niemeijer, M., van Ginneken, B., Cree, M., Mizutani, A., Quellec, G., Sanchez, C., Zhang, B., Hornero, R., Lamard, M., Muramatsu, C., Wu, X., Cazuguel, G., You, J., Mayo, A., Li, Q., Hatanaka, Y., Cochener, B., Roux, C., Karray, F., Garcia, M., Fujita, H., Abramoff, M.: Retinopathy online challenge: Automatic detection of microaneurysms in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29(1), 185–195 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parzen, E.: On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33(3), 1065–1076 (1962)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quellec, G., Lamard, M., Josselin, P., Cazuguel, G., Cochener, B., Roux, C.: Optimal wavelet transform for the detection of microaneurysms in retina photographs. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 27(9), 1230–1241 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rombaut, M., Zhu, Y.M.: Study of dempster–shafer theory for image segmentation applications. Image and Vision Computing 20(1), 15–23 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rousson, M., Paragios, N.: Prior knowledge, level set representations & visual grouping. Int. J. Comput. Vision 76(3), 231–243 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scheuermann, B., Rosenhahn, B.: Feature quarrels: The dempster-shafer evidence theory for image segmentation using a variational framework. In: Kimmel, R., Klette, R., Sugimoto, A. (eds.) ACCV 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6493, pp. 426–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tschumperle, D., Deriche, R.: Vector-valued image regularization with pdes: a common framework for different applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27(4), 506–517 (April)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Foued Derraz
    • 1
    • 3
  • Antonio Pinti
    • 4
    • 5
  • Miloud Boussahla
    • 3
  • Laurent Peyrodie
    • 2
  • Hechmi Toumi
    • 5
  1. 1.Facult Libre de MdicineInstitut Catholique de Lille, Universit Catholique de LilleFrance
  2. 2.Hautes Etudes d’IngenieurUniversit Catholique de LilleFrance
  3. 3.Telecommunication Laboratory, Technology FacultyAbou Bekr Belkaid UniversityTlemcenAlgeria
  4. 4.ENSIAME UVHCUniversite de ValenciennesFrance
  5. 5.A5 EA 4708, I3MTO, CHROOrlansFrance

Personalised recommendations