Visualizing and Measuring Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory BioPharma Case

  • Robert Lagerström
  • Carliss Baldwin
  • Alan MacCormack
  • David Dreyfus
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 165)


We test a method that was designed and used previously to reveal the hidden internal architectural structure of software systems. The focus of this paper is to test if it can also uncover new facts about the components and their relationships in an enterprise architecture, i.e., if the method can reveal the hidden external structure between architectural components. Our test uses data from a biopharmaceutical company. In total, we analyzed 407 components and 1,157 dependencies. Results show that the enterprise structure can be classified as a core-periphery architecture with a propagation cost of 23%, core size of 32%, and architecture flow through of 67%. We also found that business components can be classified as control elements, infrastructure components as shared, and software applications as belonging to the core. These findings suggest that the method could be effective in uncovering the hidden structure of an enterprise architecture.


Enterprise Architecture Design Structure Matrices Enterprise Modeling Architecture Visualization 


  1. 1.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.: Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zachman, J.A.: A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(2), 7–18 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Open Group: The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). Version 9, The Open Group (2009) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Viewpoint-based Meta Model Engineering. In: The 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures: Concepts and Applications, pp. 143–161 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Närman, P., Simonsson, M.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis with Extended Influence Diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers 9(2-3), 163–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baldwin, C., MacCormack, A., Rusnack, J.: Hidden Structure: Using Network Methods to Map System Architecture. Harvard Business School Working Paper, no. 13-093 (May 2013) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group: DoD Architecture Framework. Version 1.5, Technical report, Department of Defense, USA (2007) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zachman International,
  10. 10.
    Franke, U., Johnson, P., König, J., Marcks von Würtemberg, L.: Availability of Enterprise IT Systems: An Expert-based Bayesian Framework. Software Quality Journal 20(2), 369–394 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ullberg, J., Johnson, P., Buschle, M.: A Language for Interoperability Modeling and Prediction. Computers in Industry 63(8), 766–774 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., Höök, D.: Architecture Analysis of Enterprise Systems Modifiability: Models, Analysis, and Validation. Journal of Systems and Software 83(8), 1387–1403 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sommestad, T., Ekstedt, M., Holm, H.: The Cyber Security Modeling Language: A Tool for Assessing the Vulnerability of Enterprise System Architectures. IEEE Systems Journal (2013) (online-first) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barabási, A.: Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond. Science 325(5939), 412–413 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon, H.A.: The Architecture of Complexity. The American Philosophical Society 106(6), 467–482 (1962)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alexander, C.: Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press (1964)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mead, C., Conway, L.: Introduction to VLSI Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baldwin, C., Clark, K.: Design Rules. The Power of Modularity, vol. 1. MIT Press (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steward, D.: The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 3, 71–74 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eppinger, S.D., Whitney, D.E., Smith, R.P., Gebala, D.A.: A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development. Research in Engineering Design 6(1), 1–13 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sosa, M., Eppinger, S., Rowles, C.: A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products. Transactions of the ASME 129, 1118–1129 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacCormack, A., Baldwin, C., Rusnak, J.: Exploring the Duality Between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the “Mirroring” Hypothesis. Research Policy 41(8), 1309–1324 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dreyfus, D., Wyner, G.: Digital Cement: Software Portfolio Architecture, Complexity, and Flexibility. In: The Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). Association for Information Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dreyfus, D.: Digital Cement: Information System Architecture, Complexity, and Flexibility. PhD Thesis. Boston University Boston, MA, USA (2009) ISBN: 978-1-109-15107-7 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lagerstrom, R., Baldwin, C.Y., MacCormack, A., Aier, S.: Visualizing and Measuring Enterprise Application Architecture: An Exploratory Telecom Case. Harvard Business School Working Paper, no. 13–103 (June 2013) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holm, H., Buschle, M., Lagerström, R., Ekstedt, M.: Automatic Data Collection for Enterprise Architecture Models. Software & Systems Modeling (2012) (online first)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buschle, M., Grunow, S., Matthes, F., Ekstedt, M., Hauder, M., Roth, S.: Automating Enterprise Architecture Documentation using an Enterprise Service Bus. In: The 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    IBM Rational System Architect,
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    The Enterprise Architecture Analysis Tool,

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Lagerström
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carliss Baldwin
    • 1
  • Alan MacCormack
    • 1
  • David Dreyfus
    • 3
  1. 1.Harvard Business SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.The Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations