Skip to main content

Introduction

Political Speech: Multimodal Communication to Shape Minds and Social Action

  • Conference paper
  • 2130 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7688))

Abstract

Political discourse has been a subject for the study of communication since the very beginning of western philosophical speculation: [1], Sophists, and the first studies in rhetoric find their roots in Greek democracy, with its need to elaborate and teach techniques for reasoning and argumentation. Later, if [2] set the stage for research in argumentation for the next centuries, [3] and [4] also took into account body communication as an important part of the Orator’s repertoire, by focusing on the use of gestures, voice, posture, gaze and facial expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gorgias: Encomium of Helen (414? BC). MacDowell, D. (trans.). Bristol Classics, Glasgow (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle: On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse (360 BC). Kennedy, G.A. (trans.) 2nd edn. Oxford University, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cicero, M.T.: De Inventione (81 BC). Hubbell, H. M. (trans.). Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quintilianus, M., Institutiones Oratoriae, F. (100). He, B. (trans.) The InstitutioOratoria of Quintilian (The Loeb Classical Library). Putnam and Sons, New York (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Wilkinson, J., Weaver, P. (trans.). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Eemeren, F.H.: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lasswell, H.: The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In: Bryson, L. (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. Institute for Religious and Social Studies, New York (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Academic Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maio, G.R., Haddock, G.: Attitude Change. In: Higgins, E.T., Kruglanski, A.W. (eds.) Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles, pp. 565–586. Guilford, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miceli, M., de Rosis, F., Poggi, I.: Emotional and Non-Emotional Persuasion. Applied Artificial Intelligence 20(10), 849–879 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Interactive Technologies. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Atkinson, M.: Our Masters´ Voices. The Language and Body Language ofPolitics. Routledge, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burgoon, J.K., Birk, T., Pfau, M.: Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility. Human Communication Research 17, 140–169 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calbris, G.: L’expressionGestuelle de la Pensée d’un HommePolitique. Ed. du CNRS, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Streeck, J.: Gesture in Political Communication: A Case Study of DemocraticPresidential Candidates During the 2004 Primary Campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(2), 154–188 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oikonomopoulos, A., Pantic, M., Patras, I.: Human Gesture Recognition using Sparse B-spline Polynomial Representations. In: Proceedings of Belgium-Netherlands Conf. Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2008), Boekelo, The Netherlands, pp. 193–200 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Valstar, M.F., Mehu, M., Jiang, B., Pantic, M., Scherer, K.: Meta-Analyis of the First Facial Expression Recognition Challenge. IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B 42(4), 966–979 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassell, J., Prevost, S., Sullivan, J., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L.: Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging. An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3500 –3509 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., Narayanan, S.: A System for Real-Time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, ACL 2012, pp. 115–120. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A.: Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word ofmouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 1–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Moscovici, S.: Social Influence and Social Change. Academic Press, London (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lasswell, H.D.: Propaganda Technique in the World War. Knopf. New York (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rosenberg, A., Hirschberg, J.: Charisma Perception from Text and Speech. Speech Communication 51, 640–655 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Signorello, R., D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., Demolin, D.: How Charisma is Perceived from Speech. A multidimensional approach. In: ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., Heylen, D., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Schroeder, M.: Bridging the Gap Between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3(1), 69–87 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pesarin, A., Cristani, M., Murino, V., Vinciarelli, A.: Conversation Analysis at Work: Detection of Conflict in Competitive Discussions through Automatic Turn-Organization Analysis. Cognitive Processing 13(2), 533–540 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelman, H.C.: Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation: A Social-Psychological Perspective on Ending Violent Conflict Between Identity Groups. Landscapes of Violence: An Interdisciplinary Journal Devoted to the Study of Violence, Conflict, and Trauma 1(1), 5 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J.D. (eds.): Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation: From Violent Conflict to Peaceful Co-Existence. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Itakura, H.: Describing Conversational Dominance. Journal of Pragmatics 33(12), 1859–1880 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reisigl, M.: Rhetoric of Political Speeches. In: Wodak, R., Koller, V. (eds.) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, pp. 243–269. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E.: Cognitive, Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure. Cognition and Emotion 10, 601–626 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L., Vinciarelli, A. (2013). Introduction. In: Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L., Vinciarelli, A. (eds) Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. PS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41544-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41545-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics