Abstract
Political discourse has been a subject for the study of communication since the very beginning of western philosophical speculation: [1], Sophists, and the first studies in rhetoric find their roots in Greek democracy, with its need to elaborate and teach techniques for reasoning and argumentation. Later, if [2] set the stage for research in argumentation for the next centuries, [3] and [4] also took into account body communication as an important part of the Orator’s repertoire, by focusing on the use of gestures, voice, posture, gaze and facial expression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gorgias: Encomium of Helen (414? BC). MacDowell, D. (trans.). Bristol Classics, Glasgow (1982)
Aristotle: On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse (360 BC). Kennedy, G.A. (trans.) 2nd edn. Oxford University, New York (2007)
Cicero, M.T.: De Inventione (81 BC). Hubbell, H. M. (trans.). Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library), Cambridge (1966)
Quintilianus, M., Institutiones Oratoriae, F. (100). He, B. (trans.) The InstitutioOratoria of Quintilian (The Loeb Classical Library). Putnam and Sons, New York (1921)
Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Wilkinson, J., Weaver, P. (trans.). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)
van Eemeren, F.H.: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2010)
Lasswell, H.: The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In: Bryson, L. (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. Institute for Religious and Social Studies, New York (1948)
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Academic Press, New York (1986)
Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (1993)
Maio, G.R., Haddock, G.: Attitude Change. In: Higgins, E.T., Kruglanski, A.W. (eds.) Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles, pp. 565–586. Guilford, New York (2007)
Miceli, M., de Rosis, F., Poggi, I.: Emotional and Non-Emotional Persuasion. Applied Artificial Intelligence 20(10), 849–879 (2006)
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Interactive Technologies. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies (2003)
Atkinson, M.: Our Masters´ Voices. The Language and Body Language ofPolitics. Routledge, London (1988)
Burgoon, J.K., Birk, T., Pfau, M.: Nonverbal Behaviors, Persuasion, and Credibility. Human Communication Research 17, 140–169 (1990)
Calbris, G.: L’expressionGestuelle de la Pensée d’un HommePolitique. Ed. du CNRS, Paris (2003)
Streeck, J.: Gesture in Political Communication: A Case Study of DemocraticPresidential Candidates During the 2004 Primary Campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41(2), 154–188 (2008)
Oikonomopoulos, A., Pantic, M., Patras, I.: Human Gesture Recognition using Sparse B-spline Polynomial Representations. In: Proceedings of Belgium-Netherlands Conf. Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2008), Boekelo, The Netherlands, pp. 193–200 (2008)
Valstar, M.F., Mehu, M., Jiang, B., Pantic, M., Scherer, K.: Meta-Analyis of the First Facial Expression Recognition Challenge. IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B 42(4), 966–979 (2012)
Cassell, J., Prevost, S., Sullivan, J., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L.: Political Communication and Influence through Microblogging. An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior. In: 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3500 –3509 (2012)
Wang, H., Can, D., Kazemzadeh, A., Bar, F., Narayanan, S.: A System for Real-Time Twitter Sentiment Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, ACL 2012, pp. 115–120. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2012)
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, USA (2010)
Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A.: Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word ofmouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 1–20 (2009)
Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Moscovici, S.: Social Influence and Social Change. Academic Press, London (1976)
Lasswell, H.D.: Propaganda Technique in the World War. Knopf. New York (1927)
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1953)
Rosenberg, A., Hirschberg, J.: Charisma Perception from Text and Speech. Speech Communication 51, 640–655 (2009)
Signorello, R., D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., Demolin, D.: How Charisma is Perceived from Speech. A multidimensional approach. In: ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2012)
Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., Heylen, D., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Schroeder, M.: Bridging the Gap Between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3(1), 69–87 (2012)
Pesarin, A., Cristani, M., Murino, V., Vinciarelli, A.: Conversation Analysis at Work: Detection of Conflict in Competitive Discussions through Automatic Turn-Organization Analysis. Cognitive Processing 13(2), 533–540 (2012)
Kelman, H.C.: Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation: A Social-Psychological Perspective on Ending Violent Conflict Between Identity Groups. Landscapes of Violence: An Interdisciplinary Journal Devoted to the Study of Violence, Conflict, and Trauma 1(1), 5 (2010)
Nadler, A., Malloy, T., Fisher, J.D. (eds.): Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation: From Violent Conflict to Peaceful Co-Existence. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)
Itakura, H.: Describing Conversational Dominance. Journal of Pragmatics 33(12), 1859–1880 (2001)
Reisigl, M.: Rhetoric of Political Speeches. In: Wodak, R., Koller, V. (eds.) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, pp. 243–269. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2008)
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E.: Cognitive, Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure. Cognition and Emotion 10, 601–626 (1996)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L., Vinciarelli, A. (2013). Introduction. In: Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., Vincze, L., Vinciarelli, A. (eds) Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. PS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41544-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41545-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)