Skip to main content

Big Metamodels Are Evil

Package Unmerge – A Technique for Downsizing Metamodels

  • Conference paper
Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2013)

Abstract

While reuse is typically considered a good practice, it may also lead to keeping irrelevant concerns in derived elements. For instance, new metamodels are usually built upon existing metamodels using additive techniques such as profiling and package merge. With such additive techniques, new metamodels tend to become bigger and bigger, which leads to harmful overheads of complexity for both tool builders and users. In this paper, we introduce ≪ package unmerge≫ - a proposal for a subtractive relation between packages - which complements existing metamodel-extension techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Szyperski, C.A.: Component software - beyond object-oriented programming. Addison-Wesley-Longman (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beugnard, A., Jézéquel, J.-M., Plouzeau, N.: Making components contract aware. IEEE Computer 32(7), 38–45 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sen, S., Moha, N., Baudry, B., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Meta-model pruning. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Muller, P.-A., Fondement, F., Baudry, B., Combemale, B.: Modeling modeling modeling. Software and System Modeling 11(3), 347–359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML), superstructure, version 2.4.1. OMG Document formal/2011-08-06 (August 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language (UML), infrastructure, version 2.4.1. OMG Document formal/2011-08-05 (August 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Object Management Group, Meta-Object Facility (MOF) core, v2.4.1. OMG Document formal/2011-08-07 (August 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A., Maeda, C., Lopes, C., Loingtier, J.-M., Irwin, J.: Aspect-oriented programming. In: Akşit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Schauerhuber, A., Schwinger, W., Retschitzegger, W., Wimmer, M., Kappel, G.: A survey on aspect-oriented modeling approaches. tech. rep., Vienna University of Technology (October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whittle, J., Jayaraman, P.K., Elkhodary, A.M., Moreira, A., Araújo, J.: MATA: A unified approach for composing UML aspect models based on graph transformation. T. Aspect-Oriented Software Development VI 6, 191–237 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lasalle, J., Peureux, F., Fondement, F.: Development of an automated MBT toolchain from UML/SysML models. ISSE 7(4), 247–256 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lasalle, J., Bouquet, F., Legeard, B., Peureux, F.: SysML to UML model transformation for test generation purpose. In: UML&FM 2010, 3rd IEEE Int. Workshop on UML and Formal Methods, Shanghai, China, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes, D., Hammoudi, S., de Souza, J., Bontempo, A.: Metamodel matching: Experiments and comparison. In: ICSEA, p. 2. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falleri, J.-R., Huchard, M., Lafourcade, M., Nebut, C.: Metamodel matching for automatic model transformation generation. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 326–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Didonet, M., Fabro, D., Bézivin, J., Valduriez, P.: Weaving models with the Eclipse AMW plugin. In: Eclipse Modeling Symposium, Eclipse Summit Europe (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kagdi, H.H., Maletic, J.I., Sutton, A.: Context-free slicing of UML class models. In: ICSM, pp. 635–638. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steel, J., Jézéquel, J.-M.: On Model Typing. Journal of Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM) 6, 401–414 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dingel, J., Diskin, Z., Zito, A.: Understanding and improving UML package merge. Journal of Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM) 7, 443–467 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Emerson, M., Sztipanovits, J.: Techniques for metamodel composition. In: The 6th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, OOPSLA 2006, pp. 123–139. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Herzum, P., Sims, O.: Business Component Factory: A Comprehensive Overview of Component-Based Development for the Enterprise. Wiley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fondement, F., Muller, PA., Thiry, L., Wittmann, B., Forestier, G. (2013). Big Metamodels Are Evil. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41532-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41533-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics