Abstract
We attempt to validate the conceptual framework “Physics of Notation” (PoN) as a means for analysing visual languages by applying it to UML Use Case Diagrams. We discover that the PoN, in its current form, is neither precise nor comprehensive enough to be applied in an objective way to analyse practical visual software engineering notations. We propose an operationalization of a part of the PoN, highlight conceptual shortcomings of the PoN, and explore ways to address them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bertin, J.: Graphics and Graphic Information- Processing. Verlag Walther de Gruyter (1981)
Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Univ. Wisconsin Press (1983)
Blackwell, A., Green, T.R.G.: Notational systems–the cognitive dimensions of notations framework. In: HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, pp. 103–134 (2003)
Diprose, J.P., MacDonald, B.A., Hosking, J.G.: Ruru: A spatial and interactive visual programming language for novice robot programming. In: Costagliola, G., et al. (eds.) Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2011), pp. 25–32. IEEE Computer Society (2011)
Dobing, B., Parsons, J.: How UML is used. Com. ACM 49(5), 109–113 (2006)
Fish, A., Störrle, H.: Visual qualities of the Unified Modeling Language: Deficiencies and Improvements. In: Cox, P., Hosking, J. (eds.) Proc. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2007), pp. 41–49. IEEE Computer Society (2007)
Genon, N., Amyot, D., Heymans, P.: Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UCM Visual Notation. In: Kraemer, F.A., Herrmann, P. (eds.) SAM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6598, pp. 221–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Green, T.R.G., Blandford, A., Church, L., Roast, C., Clarke, S.: Cognitive Dimensions: achievements, new directions, and open questions. J. Visual Languages and Computing 17(4), 328–365 (2006)
Green, T.R.G., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A ‘cognitive dimensions’ framework. J. Visual Languages and Computing (7), 131–174 (1996)
Green, T.: Cognitive dimensions of notations, pp. 443–460. Cambridge University Press (1989)
Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)
Gurr, C.: Effective Diagrammatic Communication: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Issues. J. Visual Languages and Computing 10, 317–342 (1999)
Kutar, M., Britton, C., Barker, T.: A comparison of empirical study and cognitive dimensions analysis in the evaluation of uml diagrams. In: Proc. 14th Psychology of Programming Interest Group (2002)
Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–99 (1987)
Moody, D.L.: The Physics of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 35(6), 756–779 (2009)
Moody, D., van Hillegersberg, J.: Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UML Family of Diagrams. In: Gašević, D., Lämmel, R., Van Wyk, E. (eds.) SLE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5452, pp. 16–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure, V2.4 (ptc/2010-11-14). Technical report, Object Management Group (January 2011)
Roast, C.R., Khazaei, B.: An Investigation into the Validation of Formalised Cognitive Dimensions, pp. 109–122. Springer (2007)
Shimojima, A.: Inferential and Expressive Capacities of Graphical Representations: Survey and Some Generalizations. In: Blackwell, A.F., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2980, pp. 18–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Stevens, S.S.: Psychophysics. J. Wiley & Sons (1975)
Störrle, H.: On the Impact of Layout Quality to Unterstanding UML Diagrams. In: Costagliola, G., et al. (eds.) Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2011), pp. 135–142. IEEE Computer Society (2011)
Störrle, H.: On the Impact of Layout Quality to Unterstanding UML Diagrams: Diagram Type and Expertise. In: Costagliola, G., Ko, A., Cypher, A., Nichols, J., Scaffidi, C., Kelleher, C., Myers, B. (eds.) Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2012), pp. 195–202. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Störrle, H., Fish, A. (2013). Towards an Operationalization of the “Physics of Notations” for the Analysis of Visual Languages. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41532-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41533-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)