Abstract
We saw that looking up a word in a lexicon or carrying out a morphological analysis on a word can leave it with an ambiguous part of speech. The word chair, which can be assigned two tags, noun or verb, is an example of ambiguity. It is a noun in the phrase a chair, and a verb in to chair a session.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brill, E. (1995). Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4), 543–565.
Carlberger, J., Domeij, R., Kann, V., & Knutsson, O. (2004). The development and performance of a grammar checker for Swedish: A language engineering perspective. Technical report, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm.
Charniak, E. (1993). Statistical language learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Church, K. W., & Mercer, R. L. (1993). Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics using large corpora. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 1–24.
Constant, P. (1991). Analyse syntaxique par couches. Thèse de doctorat, École Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications, Paris.
Dermatas, E., & Kokkinakis, G. K. (1995). Automatic stochastic tagging of natural language texts. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 137–163.
Ejerhed, E., Källgren, G., Wennstedt, O., & Åström, M. (1992). The linguistic annotation system of the Stockholm-Umeå corpus project. Technical report 33, Department of General Linguistics, University of Umeå.
Franz, A. (1996). Automatic ambiguity resolution in natural language processing: An empirical approach (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, Vol. 1171). Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
Giménez, J., & Mà rquez, L. (2004). SVMTool: A general POS tagger generator based on support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’04), Lisbon (pp. 43–46).
Harris, Z. (1962). String analysis of sentence structure. The Hague: Mouton.
Ide, N., & Véronis, J. (1995). Text encoding initiative: Background and context. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Joshi, A. K., & Hopely, P. (1999). A parser from antiquity: An early application of finite state transducers to natural language processing. In A. Kornai (Ed.), Extended finite state models of language (Studies in natural language processing, pp. 6–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, S., & Simmons, R. (1963). A computational approach to grammatical coding of English words. Journal of the ACM, 10(3), 334–347.
Marcus, M., Marcinkiewicz, M. A., & Santorini, B. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313–330.
Merialdo, B. (1994). Tagging English text with a probabilistic model. Computational Linguistics, 20(2), 155–171.
Monachini, M., & Calzolari, N. (1996). Synopsis and comparison of morphosyntactic phenomena encoded in lexicons and corpora: A common proposal and applications to European languages. Technical report, Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale del CNR, Pisa. EAGLES Document EAG–CLWG–MORPHSYN/R.
Petrov, S., Das, D., & McDonald, R. (2012). A universal part-of-speech tagset. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul (pp. 2089–2096).
Roche, E., & Schabes, Y. (1995). Deterministic part-of-speech tagging with finite-state transducers. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 227–253.
Surdeanu, M., Johansson, R., Meyers, A., Mà rquez, L., & Nivre, J. (2008). The CoNLL 2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies. In CoNLL 2008: Proceedings of the 12th conference on computational natural language learning, Manchester (pp. 159–177).
Vergne, J. (1998). Entre arbre de dépendance et ordre linéaire, les deux processus de transformation: Linéarisation, puis reconstruction de l’arbre. Cahiers de grammaire, 23.
Vergne, J. (1999). Étude et modélisation de la syntaxe des langues à l’aide de l’ordinateur. Analyse syntaxique automatique non combinatoire. Synthèse et résultats. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Caen.
Voutilainen, A., Heikkilä, J., & Anttila, A. (1992). Constraint grammar of English: A performance-oriented introduction. Technical report 21, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.
Voutilainen, A., & Järvinen, T. (1995). Specifying a shallow grammatical representation for parsing purposes. In Proceedings of the seventh conference of the European chapter of the ACL, Dublin (pp. 210–214).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nugues, P.M. (2014). Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Rules. In: Language Processing with Perl and Prolog. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41464-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41464-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41463-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41464-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)