Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Forests and Rural Development pp 333–373Cite as

Forest Governance and Sustainable Rural Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Tropical Forestry ((TROPICAL,volume 9))

Abstract

How might forest institutions be designed to encourage long-term and collective natural resource management, while also addressing the needs of local people? This chapter sheds light on this question by reviewing insights of ‘good forest governance’ scholarship, with a focus on ongoing developments in Southeast Asia. It is argued that building enduring, effective forest management responsive to the needs of local communities requires greater focus on the role of two key governance concepts: institutional intersection and policy learning. From this review, the chapter extrapolates key findings for practitioners seeking to promote ‘good forest governance’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The World Bank valued the extreme poverty line at US$ 1.25 a day in 2005 prices (World Bank 2010).

  2. 2.

    See also Rosenau (2006) and Benz et al. (2007).

  3. 3.

    The ‘Worldwide Governance Indicators’ (WGI) project, supported by the World Bank, measures the following six dimensions of governance: voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption (Kaufmann et al. 2010).

  4. 4.

    Multi-level governance focuses on the interplay or intersection of institutions throughout all administrative scales (Young 2002).

  5. 5.

    REDD (‘reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries’) was later expanded to REDD+.

  6. 6.

    The three pillars are: Political-Security Community, Economic Community and Socio-Cultural Community.

  7. 7.

    The nine processes are: C&I of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), the Pan-European process through the Ministerial Conference for the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE), the Montreal Process for temperate and boreal forests, the African Timber Organization’s C&I, the Dry-Zone Africa Process, the Tarapoto Process for the Amazon region, the Lepaterique Process for Central America, as well as C&I processes in the Near East and on Dry Forests in Asia (FAO 2006b). In the case of ITTO, it is an international process, not regional.

  8. 8.

    The seven elements are: extent of forest resources, biological diversity, forest health and vitality, productive functions of forest resources, protective functions of forest resources, socio-economic functions, legal, policy and institutional framework.

References

  • Adam S, Kriesi H (2007) The network approach. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB (2008) Emerging Asian regionalism. A partnership for shared prosperity. Highlights. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB (2009) The economics of climate change in Southeast Asia: a regional review. Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Angelsen A (2009) Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals. In: Angelsen A (ed) Realising REDD+: national strategy and policy options. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, pp 201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Chhatre A, Hardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 320(5882):1460–1462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht J, Obser A (2003) Institutional dimensions of international public forest policies. Open meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change research community, panel on “Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale”. Montréal, 16–18 Oct 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright EA (2011) Policy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in Hungary: an advocacy coalition approach. Policy Stud J 39(3):485–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A (ed) (2008) Moving ahead with REDD. Issues, options and implications. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, Boucher D, Brown S, Merckx V, Streck C, Zarin D (2011) Modalities for REDD+ reference levels: technical and procedural issues. Meridian Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2007) ASEAN criteria and indicators for sustainable management of tropical forests. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2008a) ASEAN common position paper on reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in developing countries. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2008b) ASEAN inputs to the country-led initiative (CLI) in support to the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF). Financing for sustainable forest management: an international dialogue. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2008c) ASEAN inputs to the eights session of the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF). Forests in a changing environment and means of implementation for sustainable forest management. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2008d) Work plan for strengthening forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) in ASEAN 2008–2015. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2009a) ASEAN joint statement on climate change to the 15th session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 5th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN (2009b) A proposed outline “Format for assessing forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) implementation in ASEAN Member States”. ASEAN technical workshop on the thematic elements for assessing FLEG implementation in ASEAN member states in Kuala Lumpur. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer MR, Karr-Colque C, Samman S (2005) Taking stock of the international arrangements on forests. J Forest 103(3):126–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher B, Rujehan NI, Achdiawan R (2004) Rattan, rubber, or oil palm: cultural and financial considerations for farmers in Kalimantan. Econ Bot 58(Supplement):S77–S87

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett CJ, Howlett M (1992) The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci 25(3):275–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz A (2004) Multilevel Governance – Governance in Mehrebenensystemen. In: Benz A (ed) Governance. Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz A, Lütz S, Schimank U, Simonis G (2007) Einleitung. In: Benz A, Lütz S, Schimank U, Simonis G (eds) Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S, Cashore B (2007) Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regul Gov 1:347–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein S, Cashore B, Atyi RE, Maryudi A, McGinley K (2010) Examination of the influences of global forest governance arrangements at the domestic level. In: Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Embracing complexity: meeting the challenges of international forest governance. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, pp 111–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F (2004) Global environmental governance. Conceptualization and examples. Global governance working paper no. 12. The Global Governance Project, Amsterdam/Berlin/Oldenburg/Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom B, Sunderland T, Murdiyarso D (2010) Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environ Sci Policy 13(2):164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal J (2005) Governance – eine kritische Zwischenbilanz. Z Polit 4(15):1149–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • BMZ (2004) National forest programmes: instruments for improving sector governance? Experiences of German development cooperation. Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky DM (1999) The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law? Am J Int Law 93:596–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel TA (1998) Organizing Babylon – on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Adm 76(2):253–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel TA (2005) European Governance – nicht neu, aber anders. In: Schuppert GF (ed) Governance-Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 72–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd E, Gutierrez M, Chang M (2007) Small-scale forest carbon projects: adapting CDM to low-income communities. Glob Environ Chang 17:250–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzi L, Cashore B, Levin K, McDermott C (2012) The role of private voluntary climate programs affecting forests: assessing their direct and intersecting effects. In: Ronit K (ed) Business and climate policy: the potentials and pitfalls of private voluntary programs. United Nations University Press, Tokyo/New York/Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack D (2006) Regional cooperation to combat illegal logging. Options for ASEAN and the East Asia region. Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Schreckenberg K, Bird N, Cerutti P, Del Gatto F, Diaw C, Fomete T, Luttrell C, Navarro G, Oberndorf R, Hans T, Wells A (2008a) Legal timber. Verification and governance in the forest sector. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Seymour F, Peskett L (2008b) How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm? In: Angelsen A (ed) Moving ahead with REDD. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, pp 107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch P-O, Jörgens H, Tews K (2005) The global diffusion of regulatory instruments: the making of a new international environmental regime. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 598(1):146–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Gov Int J Policy Adm Inst 15(4):503–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B (2009a) Key components of good forest governance in ASEAN, vol 6, Exlibris series. ASEAN-German Regional Forest Programme (ReFOP), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B (2009b) Structure for ‘FLEG’ at a glance. ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on FLEG. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Stone M (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. Forest Policy Econ 18:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Gale F, Meidinger E, Newsom D (2006) Forest certification in developing and transitioning countries. Environ Sci Policy Sust Dev 48(9):6–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Auld G, Bernstein S, Mc Dermott C (2007) Can non-state governance ‘ratchet up’ global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 16(2):158–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashore B, Galloway G, Cubbage F, Humphreys D, Katila P, Levin K, Maryudi A, McDermott C, McGinley K (2010) Ability of institutions to address new challenges. In: Mery G, Katila P, Galloway G, Alfaro RI, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M, Varjo J (eds) Forests and society – responding to global drivers of change. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, pp 441–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasek PS, Downie DL, Welsh Brown J (2010) Global environmental politics, 5th edn. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AS, Danks C, Allred SR (2011) The role of social and policy learning in changing forest governance: an examination of community-based forestry initiatives in the U.S. Forest Policy Econ 13:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2009) Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(42):17667–17670

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colfer CJP (2005) The complex forest. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Colfer CJP, Capistrano D, Dabal GR, Moeliono M (eds) (2008) Lessons from forest decentralization. Money justice and the quest for good governance in Asia-Pacific. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conca K (2006) Governing water. Contentious transnational politics and global institutions building. MIT Press, Cambridge/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras-Hermosilla A (2007) Forest law enforcement and governance program. Review of implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras-Hermosilla A, Gregersen HM, White A (2008) Forest governance in countries with federal systems of government. Lessons and implications for decentralization. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula L, Mayers J (2009) Tenure in REDD. Start-point or afterthought? vol 15, Natural Resource Issues. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz RVO, Tapia MA (2006) A review of the multi-sectoral forest protection committees in the Philippines, vol 6, ODI Forestry Briefing. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Currey D (2001) Timber trafficking: illegal logging in Indonesia, South East Asia and international consumption of illegally sourced timber. Retrieved 20 Feb 2002, from http://www.eia-international.org/campaigns/forests/reports/timber/index.html

  • Dauvergne P (1994) The politics of deforestation in Indonesia. Pac Aff 66(4):497–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport DS (2005) An alternative explanation for the failure of the UNCED forest negotiations. Global Environ Polit 5(1):105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • del Río P (2010) Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy 38(9):4978–4989

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov RS (2005) Hostage to norms: states, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environ Polit 5(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov RS, Sprinz DF, DiGiusto GM, Kelle A (2007) International nonregimes: a research agenda. Int Stud Rev 9:230–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove M (1983) Theories of swidden agriculture and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforest Syst 1:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove MR (2006) Indigenous people and environmental politics. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove MR (2011) The banana tree at the gate: a history of marginal peoples and global markets in Borneo. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunoff JL (2007) Levels of environmental governance. In: Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutschke M, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Peskett L, Luttrell C, Streck C, Brown J (2008) Financing REDD. Linking country needs and financing sources, vol 17, Info Brief. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • EFI (2009) FLEGT Asia regional programme. Supporting responsible trade for Asia’s forest. European Forest Institute (EFI), Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott C, Schlaepfer R (2001) Understanding forest certification using the advocacy coalition framework. Forest Pol Econ 2:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty DC (2006) Toward good global governance: the role of administrative law. Yale Law J 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucker D, Hein J (2010) Klimawandel in Südostasien. Die ASEAN als Wegbereiter einer regionalen Klimapolitik? vol 4, GIGA Fokus Asien. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006a) Understanding national forest programmes. Guidance for practitioners. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006b) Global forest resources assessment 2005 – progress towards sustainable forest management, vol 147, FAO Forestry Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009) State of the world’s forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Key findings. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, ITTO (2005) Best practices for improving law compliance in the forest sector, vol 145, FAO Forestry Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawzia F (2010) What’s next after Copenhagen? A brief analysis on the outcomes of the Copenhagen climate conference and REDD-plus for ASEAN. ARKN-FCC Briefing Paper No. 5. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty EA (2007) Transnational governance. In: Bevir M (ed) Encyclopedia of governance. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost EL (2008) Asia’s new regionalism. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • G8 (2008) Chair’s summary G8 environment ministers meeting. Kobe, 24–26 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway G, Katila P, Krug J (2010) The need for new strategies and approaches. In: Mery G, Katila P, Galloway G, Alfaro RI, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M, Varjo J (eds) Forests and society – responding to global drivers of change. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, pp 441–486

    Google Scholar 

  • GFEP (2009) CPF Global Forest Expert Panel (GFEP). Expert panel on the international forest regime. Terms of reference. Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 107(38):16732–16737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Rayner J (2009) Governance and policies for adaptation. In: Seppälä R, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Adaptation of forests and people to climate change – a global assessment report, vol 22, IUFRO World Series. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Rayner J, Cashore B (2005) Changes in the governance of forest resources. In: Mery G, Alfaro R, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M (eds) Forests in the global balance – changing paradigms, vol 17, IUFRO World Series. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, pp 39–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Angelsen A, Appelstrand M, Assembe-Mvondo S, Auld G, Hogl K, Humphreys D, Wildburger C (2010) Core components of the international forest regime complex. In: Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Embracing complexity: meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the international forest regime. International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhler D, Schwaab J (2009) Managing knowledge and regional policy advice: ASEAN forest clearing house mechanism. ASEAN high-level seminar on climate adaptation and mitigation. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta, 23–25 Mar 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhler D, Liss B-M, Thunberg J (2009a) Implementation of forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) through national forest programs (nfp). ARKN Policy Brief. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhler D, McGill H, Obser A (2009b) Development interfaces: peer review and the development potential of regional institutions, policies and programs, vol 4, Exlibris series. ASEAN-German Regional Forest Programme (ReFOP), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullison RE (2003) Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx 37(2):153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham N, Grabosky PN (eds) (1998) Smart regulation. Designing environmental policy. Oxford socio-legal studies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas PM (2002) UN conferences and constructivist governance of the environment. Glob Gov 8:73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Harguindéguy J-B (2007) Policy learning. In: Bevir M (ed) Encyclopedia of governance. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier A (2003) New modes of governance in Europe: increasing political capacity and policy effectiveness? In: Börzel TA, Cichowski R (eds) The state of the European Union, vol 6, Law, politics, and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 105–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs A (2008) Training workshop on timber verification of legality systems, Brunei Darussalam. Briefing Paper No. 4. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta, 21–23 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs A (2009) Briefing note on ASEAN criteria and indicators for legality of timber, vol 5, Briefing Paper. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogl K, Nordbeck R, Pregernig M (2008) GoFOR – new modes of governance for sustainable forestry in Europe. Project under the sixth EU framework programme for research and technology development. Publishable final activity report as of 13 Aug 2008. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Science, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger K, Knill C, Sommerer T (2008) Environmental policy convergence: the impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. Int Organ 62(3):553–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M (2002) Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990–2000. Can J Polit Sci 35(2):235–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M, Joshi-Koop S (2011) Transnational learning, policy analytical capacity, and environmental policy convergence: survey results from Canada. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A (2009) Studying public policy. Policy cycles & policy subsystems. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys D (ed) (2006) Logjam: deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2010) Rural poverty report 2011. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2005) The beginning of the ENA-FLEG process in Russia: civil society insights. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamelarczyk K, Strandby U (2009) The effect of IPPKs on household livelihoods in Malinau district, East Kalimantan. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Global Economy and Development at Brookings Institutions, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern K, Jörgens H, Jänicke M (2000) Die Diffusion umweltpolitischer Innovationen. Ein Beitrag zur Globalisierung von Umweltpolitik. Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik (FFU). Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeng CH (2009) Policy brief on the impact of EU FLEGT action plan on ASEAN Member States intra- and international timber trade flow to EU. ARKN Policy Brief. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeng CH, Malessa U (2009) Policy brief on the impact of the Lacy Act (amended 2008) on ASEAN Member States intra- and international timber trade flow to the USA. ARKN Policy Brief. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman J (ed) (1993) Modern governance: new government – society interactions. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson AM (2005) Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector. In: Colfer CJP, Capistrano D (eds) The politics of decentralization. Earthscan, London, pp 32–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson FH (2009) Comparative regionalism. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson S, MacFaul L (2010) Illegal logging and related trade. Indicators of the global response. Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejano R (2006) The design of environmental regimes: social construction, contextuality, and improvisation. Int Environ Agreem 6(2):187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin K, McDermott C, Cashore B (2008) The climate regime as global forest governance: can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) initiatives pass a ‘dual effectiveness’ test? Int For Rev 10(3):538–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy MA, Young OR, Zürn M (1995) The study of international regimes. Eur J Int Relat 1(3):267–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Limberg G (2009) Impact of small timber harvest permits on villages in the Malinau watershed. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Limberg G, Iwan R, Moeliono M, Sudana M, Wollenberg E (2007) Community-based forestry and management planning. In: Gunarso P, Setyawati T, Sunderland T, Shackleton C (eds) Managing forest resources in a decentralized environment. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) & International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinau District Government (2007) Baseline data on carbon stocks; identification of potential forest use for carbon sequestration in Malinau, East Kalimantan. District Agency of Environmental Impact Mitigation (BAPEDALDA), Malinau District Government, Malinau

    Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Olsen JP (1995) Democratic governance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RM (2004) Regional approaches: bridging national and global efforts. Unasylva 55(3):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Stone D (2005) Global knowledge networks and international development. Bridges across boundaries. In: Stone D, Maxwell S (eds) Global knowledge networks and international development: bridges across boundaries. Routledge, London, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (2004) Governance im Modernen Staat. In: Benz A (ed) Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Eine Einführung. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz R (2008) Von der Steuerungstheorie zu Global Governance. In: Schuppert GF, Zürn M (eds) Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 43–60

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JF (2004) Changing to grey: decentralization and the emergence of volatile socio-legal configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Dev 32(7):1199–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott CL, O’Carroll A, Wood P (2007) International forest policy – the instruments, agreements and processes that shape it. United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott C, Cashore B, Kanowski P (2010) Global environmental forest policies. An international comparison. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott CL, Levin K, Cashore B (2011) Building the forest-climate bandwagon: REDD+ and the logic of problem amelioration. Glob Environ Polit 11(3):85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeliono M, Limberg G (2009) The geography of Malinau. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanang M, Inoue M (2000) Local forest management in Indonesia: a contradiction between national forest policy and reality. Int Rev Environ Strateg 1(1):175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson BJ (1996) Public policy and administration: an overview. In: Goodin RE, Klingemann H-D (eds) A new handbook of political science. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 551–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo BS, Chen G (2007) Dynamic governance. Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesadurai HES, Stone D (2000) Southeast Asian research institutes and regional cooperation. In: Stone D (ed) Banking on knowledge. The genesis of the global development network. Routledge, London/New York, pp 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomura K (2008) The politics of participation in forest management: a case from democratizing Indonesia. J Environ Dev 17(2):166–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye JS (2004) Soft power. The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Obser A, van Dijk K, Liss B-M, Wibowo PM, von Pfeil E (2005) Regionalization of the international forest policy dialogue: options for functions and structures (non-paper). Country led initiative (CLI) in support of the United Nations Forum on Forests (UNFF): scoping for a future agreement on forests. Federal Ministry of Consumer Protection, Food and Agriculture (BMVEL) and Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Berlin, 16–18 Nov 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Regional integration in the Asia Pacific. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou V, Flamos A, Grafakos S (2010) Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments always desirable? Energy Policy 38(8):4186–4195

    Google Scholar 

  • Öjendal J (2001) Southeast Asia at a constant crossroads: an ambiguous ‘new region’. In: Schulz M, Söderbaum F, Öjendal J (eds) Regionalization in a globalizing world. A comparative perspective on forms, actors and processes. Zed Books, London/New York, pp 147–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Okereke C, Dooley K (2010) Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Glob Environ Chang 20:82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect 14(3):137–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) Institutional rational choice. An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Policy research working paper 5095. Background paper to the 2010 World Development Report. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OTCA, CCAD, FAO/COFLAC (2009) Regionalization of the forest dialogue. The Puembo initiative. Lessons learnt and outlook. XIII World Forestry Congress, side event. Buenos Aires, 19 Oct 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C (2009) Who, how and for what? Negotiations and outcomes from IPPK agreements between communities and brokers in Malinau. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) Decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni L, Dutschke M, Streck C, Porrura ME (2009) Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Clim Policy 9:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso NL (1992) Rich forests, poor people. Resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso NL (1993) Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Chang 3(2):199–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso NL, Harwell E (2001) Territory, custom, and the cultural politics of ethnic war in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. In: Peluso NL, Watts M (eds) Violent environments. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 83–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescott MJ, Durst PB, Leslie RN (eds) (2010) Forest law enforcement and governance: progress in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission (APFC), Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Peskett L, Huberman D, Bowen-Jones E, Edwards G, Brown J (2008) Making REDD work for the poor. A Poverty Environment Partnership (PEP) report. https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/redd_paper___web.pdf

  • Pfaff A, Sills EO, Amacher GS, Coren MJ, Lawlor K, Streck C (2010) Policy impacts on deforestation. Lessons learned from past experiences to inform new initiatives. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps J, Webb EL, Agrawal A (2010) Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328:312–313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Kenis P (2007) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Admin Res Theory 18:229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Pülzl H, Rametsteiner E (2002) Grounding international modes of governance into national forest programmes. Forest Pol Econ 4(4):259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli CM (2003) The open method of coordination: a new governance architecture for the European Union? Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner J, Howlett M (2004) National forest programmes as vehicles for next generation regulation. In: Humphreys D (ed) Forests for the future. National forest programmes in Europe. Country and regional reports from COST Action E19. European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST), Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke WH, Deng F, Witte JM, Benner T, Whitaker B, Gershman J (2000) Critical choices. The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee S (2009) The cultural politics of collaboration to control and access forest resources in Malinau, East Kalimantan. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham/Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot JC (2005) Choosing representation: institutions and powers for decentralized natural resource management. In: Colfer CJP, Capistrano D (eds) The politics of decentralization. Forests, power and people. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot JC, Agrawal A, Larson AM (2006) Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Dev 34(11):1864

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse T (2007) Zur “Reisefähigkeit” des Governance-Konzeptes. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series Nr. 5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 700, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse T, Lehmkuhl U (2006) Governance in areas of limited statehood – new modes of governance? SFB-Governance Working Paper Series No. 1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Research Center (SFB) 700, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger V, Zangl B, Kruck A (2012) International organization, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • RLI (2008) Report of the Australian – Swiss region led initiative on regional input in support of the United Nations Forum on Forests. Region led initiative (RLI) co-hosted by the governments of Australia and Switzerland. Geneva, 28–30 Jan 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Robledo C, Blaser J, Byrne S, Schmidt K (2008) Climate change and governance in the forest sector: an overview of the issues on forests and climate change with specific consideration of sector governance, tenure and access for local stakeholders. Intercooperation, Berne

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau JN (2006) The study of world politics, vol 2, Globalization and governance. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosendal KG (2001) Overlapping international regimes. The case of the International Forum on Forests (IFF) between climate change and biodiversity. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ 1(4):447–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21:129–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (1999) The advocacy coalition framework. An assessment. In: Sabatier PA (ed.) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 117–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Salafsky N, Margoluis R (2004) Using adaptive management to improve ICDPs. In: McShane TO, Wells MP (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 372–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi J, Samyn J-M (2008) National action plans to combat illegal logging and other forest crimes – progress and lessons learnt. Expert meeting on forest law enforcement and governance – progress and lessons learned. Bucharest, 13–15 Oct 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson I (2002) Making sense of ‘what works’: evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality? Public Policy Admin 17(3):61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell B (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12(2):37

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders J, Nussbaum R (2007) Forest governance and reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD). Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf F (1993) Positive und negative Koordination in Verhandlungssystemen. In: Héritier A (ed) Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (PVS-Sonderheft 24/1993). Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp 57–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppert GF (2008) Governance –auf der Suche nach Konturen eines “anerkannt uneindeutigen Begriffs”. In: Schuppert GF, Zürn M (eds) Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state; how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour F (2008) Forests, climate change, and human rights: managing risk and trade-offs. Human rights and climate change. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikor T, Stahl J, Enters T, Ribot JC, Singh N, Sunderlin WD, Wollenberg L (2010) REDD-plus, forest people’s rights and nested climate governance. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):423–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer B (2008) Putting the national back into forest-related policies: the international forests regime and national policies in Brazil and Indonesia. Int For Rev 10(3):523–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Siry J, Cubbage F, Ahmed M (2005) Sustainable forest management: global challenges and opportunities. Forest Policy Econ 7(4):551–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriaga R (2010) A review and analysis of the impacts of forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) on sustainable livelihoods. ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on FLEG Policy Brief. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriaga R, Cashore B (2009) Contribution and effectiveness of local governments in forest law enforcement and governance in ASEAN. ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on FLEG Policy Paper. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Springate-Baginski O, Wollenberg E (eds) (2010) REDD, forest governance and rural livelihoods. The emerging agenda. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone D (2000) Non-governmental policy transfer: the strategies of independent policy institutes. Gov Int J Policy Adm 13(1):45–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone D (2005) Knowledge networks and global policy. In: Stone D, Maxwell S (eds) Global knowledge networks and international development: bridges across boundaries. Routledge, London, pp 89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck C (2005) Governments and policy networks: chances, risks, and a missing strategy. In: Wijnen F, Zoeteman K, Pieters J (eds) A handbook of globalization and environmental policy. Egward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck C (2010) Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: national implementation of REDD schemes. Clim Change 100(3):389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudana M (2009) Winners take all: understanding forest conflict in the era of decentralization in Indonesia. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacconi L (ed) (2007) Illegal logging: law enforcement, livelihoods and the timber trade. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • TFD (2005) Practical actions to combat illegal logging. The Forests Dialogue, Yale University, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Thang HC (2008a) Linkages between the ASEAN criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management of tropical forests and the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests (IPF)/Intergovernmnetal Forum on Forests (IFF) proposals for action. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Thang HC (2008b) Forest law enforcement, governance and trade in Asia. An update. VERIFOR project/FAO international workshop on legality of traded timber: the development challenges. Rome, 24–26 Nov 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Thang HC (2009) Managing regional expert pools through regional knowledge networks in ASEAN. In: Van Wart M, Göhler D, Fawzia F (eds) Seminar proceedings ASEAN high-level seminar. Climate change adaptation and mitigation: towards a cross-sectoral programme approach in ASEAN. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Thang HC (2010) The use of the ASEAN peer consultation framework (PCF) in forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) assessment in the Philippines. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Theisohn T, Land T (2009) Connecting communities of practice. Practice reports capacity development knowledge architecture, issue 36. http://www.capacity.org/en/layout/set/print/content/view/full/5533. Accessed on 18 Dec 2009

  • Thorburn C (2002) Regime change–prospects for community-based resource management in post-new order Indonesia. Soc Nat Resour 15:617–628

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2008) Report of the conference of the parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali, from 3 to 15 Dec 2007. Addendum part two: action taken by the conference of the parties at its thirteenth session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Glasbergen P (2007) Partnerships in forest governance. Glob Environ Chang 17:408–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler J (2005) In defense of international environmental cooperation. In: Barry J, Eckersley R (eds) The state and the global ecological crisis. The MIT Press, Cambridge/London, pp 229–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg E, Moeliono M, Limberg G (2009) Between state and society: decentralization in Indonesia. In: Moeliono M, Wollenberg E, Limberg G (eds) The decentralization of forest governance; politics, economics and the fight for control of forests in Indonesian Borneo. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006a) Strengthening forest law enforcement and governance. Addressing a systematic constraint to sustainable development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006b) The Antalya workshop – from declaration to action. Implementing the St. Petersburg declaration on forest law enforcement and governance (FLEG) in Europe and North Asia (ENA). Antalya, 16–18 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2006c) Guidelines. Formulation and implementation of national action plans to combat illegal logging and other forest crime. Draft for discussion, revised June 2006. World Bank technical papers, sustainable development series. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009a) World development report 2010. Development and climate change. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009b) Roots for good forest outcomes: an analytical framework for governance reforms. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) World development indicators 2010. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • WRI (2009) The governance of forests initiative. Second meeting of the ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on FLEG. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Manila, 10–12 Feb 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmi Y, Broadhead J, Enters T, Genge C (2010) Forest policies, legislation and institutions in Asia and the Pacific. Trends and emerging needs for 2020. Asia-Pacific forestry sector outlook study II. Working Paper Series No. APFSOS II/WP/2010/34. Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change. Fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Young W (2010) Rio conventions redux: an argument for merging the trio into a single convention on environmental management. J Sustain Dev 4(1):134–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR, Leslie AK, Schroeder H (eds) (2008) Institutions and environmental change. Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf AA, Francisco H (2009) Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn M (2008) Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt – eine Zwischenbilanz. In: Schuppert GF, Zürn M (eds) Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 553–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn M, Koenig-Archibugi M (2006) Conclusion II: the modes and dynamics of global governance. In: Koenig-Archibugi M, Zürn M (eds) New modes of governance in the global system. Exploring publicness, delegation and inclusiveness. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 236–254

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5, 65760, Eschborn, Germany

    Daniela Göhler

  2. Environmental Governance and Political Science, Yale University’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    Benjamin Cashore

  3. Alumnus of Yale University’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 1562 J Street, Arcata, CA, 95521, USA

    Benjamin Blom

Authors
  1. Daniela Göhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Cashore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Blom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Göhler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Jürgen Pretzsch

  2. Faculty of Life Sciences, Hochschule Rhein-Waal, Kleve, Germany

    Dietrich Darr

  3. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Holm Uibrig

  4. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Eckhard Auch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Göhler, D., Cashore, B., Blom, B. (2014). Forest Governance and Sustainable Rural Development. In: Pretzsch, J., Darr, D., Uibrig, H., Auch, E. (eds) Forests and Rural Development. Tropical Forestry, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41404-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation