Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 12))

  • 959 Accesses

Abstract

In the present chapter, we examine the views of two well-known and influential philosophers concerning the ubiquitous character of concrete computation. They both share a common objective, namely, the falsification of the computationalist thesis that cognition is computational. But in order to accomplish this objective, they in effect undermine the demarcation of digital computation as a subject matter. For, by their lights, there is no fact of the matter about what digital computation is. On their view, every physical object implements any number of programs and, hence, computes every Turing-computable function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ben-Jacob, E., Levine, H.: The artistry of nature. Nature 409(6823), 985–986 (2001), doi:10.1038/35059178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N.: Searle’s arguments against cognitive science. In: Preston, J., Bishop, M. (eds.) Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 70–79. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokulich, P.: The Physics and Metaphysics of Computation and Cognition. In: Müller, V.C. (ed.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. SAPERE, vol. 5, pp. 29–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2012), http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.: Implementation and indeterminacy. In: Weckert, J., Al-Saggaf, Y. (eds.) Computers and Philosophy 2003: Selected Papers from the Computers and Philosophy Conference, pp. 27–31. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2003), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1082145.1082150 (retrieved)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner, J.: Gödel, Putnam, and functionalism: a new reading of Representation and reality. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J.: On implementing a computation. Minds and Machines 4(4), 391–402 (1994), doi:10.1007/BF00974166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J.: Does a rock implement every finite-state automaton? Synthese 108(3), 309–333 (1996), doi:10.1007/BF00413692

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J.: A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science 12(4), 323–357 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisley, R.L.: Why everything doesn’t realize every computation. Minds and Machines 4(4), 403–420 (1994), doi:10.1007/BF00974167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S.A.: The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In: STOC 1971: Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158. ACM Press (1971), doi:10.1145/800157.805047

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortnow, L.: The status of the P versus NP problem. Communications of the ACM 52(9), 78–86 (2009), doi:10.1145/1562164.1562186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.A.: Wittgenstein on rules and private language: an elementary exposition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R.C., Nwana, H.S., Shave, M.J.R., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Computing at the tissue/organ level. In: Varela, F.J., Bourgine, P. (eds.) Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 411–419. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: The emperor’s new mind: concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Planck, M.: The theory of heat radiation. Maple Press, P. Blakiston’s Son & Co., New York (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: Representation and reality. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheutz, M.: When Physical Systems Realize Functions... Minds and Machines 9(2), 161–196 (1999), doi:10.1023/A:1008364332419

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: Is the brain a digital computer? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64, 21–37 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nir Fresco .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fresco, N. (2014). The Triviality “Account” Examined. In: Physical Computation and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41375-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41375-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41374-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41375-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics