Skip to main content

Résumé

Many European states, including France, have chosen to publicly organize hospital care. Some of these countries have gone further, publicly organizing ambulatory care (or “city” medicine.) The European Court of Justice ruled that publicly organizing healthcare services in this way is compatible with European laws on competition, for the goal of such planning is to protect the financial equilibrium of national health insurance programs. This objective can also lead states to develop cross-border health cooperation initiatives. It is true that poor regional distribution of healthcare services compromises healthcare quality and equal access to medical service. As it is impossible to rapidly raise the number of medical practices established in underserved regions, cross-border healthcare cooperation can help to better serve frontier regions throughout Europe. This way, states can also take advantage of economies of scale, avoiding “redundant” investment on two sides of a border. Health cooperation also improves access to emergency services. Ambulance teams from neighboring regions can be called if their intervention would save time. This could be either because the team in question is already closer to the place where help is needed, or because they are already available or better equipped to help in the given situation. Finally, cross-border health cooperation should help reduce the problems linked to free mobility of patients and practitioners. This should keep healthcare systems from competing with one another, as certain financing actions and preferential tariffs, on the part of certain hospitals can otherwise attract more patients, including those who previously sought healthcare on the other side of the border. This can also cause healthcare professionals to migrate across the border, particularly where the two regions share the same language or culture, leading to a lack of services on the other side of the border and thus, less overall access to care. One third of the population of the European Union lives in a border region. It is thus easy to understand why the EU seeks to improve crossborder health cooperation. One way in which this is done is through programs called “Interreg,” financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), an organization meant to reinforce economic and social cohesion within the European Union, working to improve regional equilibrium. This provides economic incentives for countries to develop healthcare cooperation with one another. France has already signed such a treaty with Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Spain; a similar treaty with Switzerland is planned for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nous actualisons et développons certains éléments de deux de nos publications antérieures, en ligne sur le site internet www.remipellet.com.

  2. 2.

    CJCE 12 septembre 2000, Pavlov, aff. C-180/98 à C 184/98, Rec. p. I-06451.

  3. 3.

    CJCE, 12 juillet 2001, Smits et Peerbooms, C-157/99, Rec. p. I-5473, points 76 à 80, et CJCE, 16 mai 2006, Watts, affaire C-372/04, points 108 à 110.

Références

  • Gillet JL, Loriferne D, Prétot X (dir) (2011) Assurance et protection sociale. Dalloz, p 57–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion S (2010) « Services d’intérêt général, santé et droit de l’Union européenne ». Revue de droit sanitaire et social 2010:993

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion S (2012) « Service public de santé et droit européen ». In: Didier Tabuteau (dir) Service public et santé. Éditions de santé, Presses de Sciences Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellet R (2009a) « Assurance maladie et territoires ». RDSS numéro Hors série:38–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellet R (2009b) « L’Europe et la Santé ». In: de Kervasdoué J (dir) Le Carnet de santé de la France. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellet R (2010) «Les médecins libéraux et la loi 2009-879 du 21 juillet 2009, Hôpital, Patients, Santé, Territoire (HPST)». Revue URML. http://www.remipellet.com/70medecinslibera.html

  • Pellet R (2011) « L’avenir des services sociaux non marchands en Europe ». In: Gillet JL, Loriferne D, Prétot X (dir) Assurance et protection sociale. Dalloz, Paris, p 57–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémi Pellet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pellet, R., Ciritsis, B. (2014). Coopération transfrontalière européenne, planification nationale et maîtrise des dépenses de santé. In: Hennion, S., Kaufmann, O. (eds) Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41310-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41311-7

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics