Various Detection Techniques and Platforms for Monitoring Interference Condition in a Wireless Testbed
Recently the constant growth of the wireless communication technology has caused a huge demand for experimental facilities. Hence many research institutes setup public accessible experimental facilities, known as testbeds. Compared to the facilities developed by individual researchers, a testbed typically offers more resources, more flexibilities. However, due to the fact that equipments are located remotely and experiments involve more complex scenarios, the required complexity for analysis is also higher. A deep insight on the underlying wireless environment of the testbed becomes necessary for comprehensive analysis.
In this chapter, we present a framework and associated techniques for monitoring the wireless environment in a large scale wireless testbed. The framework utilizes most common resources in the testbed, such as WI-FI nodes, as well as some high-end software-defined radio platforms. Information from both physical layer and network layer are taken into account. We observe that feature detection is more sensitive than general energy detection for dedicated technologies, and distributed spectrum sensing can further improve the detection sensitivity. Such observations are applied to achieve better interference detection. The performance is mainly analyzed experimentally.
KeywordsInterference detection testbed spectrum sensing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.IEEE802.11 standards revised due to fast WI-FI growth, http://www.telecoms.com/43908/802-11-standards-revised-due-to-growth-of-wifi/
- 2.IEEE standards, http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/
- 3.Burchfield, R., et al.: RF in the Jungle: Effect of Environment Assumptions on Wireless Experiment Repeatability. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009, pp. 1–6 (2009), doi:10.1109/ICC.2009.5199421Google Scholar
- 4.Kamerman, A., Monteban, L.: WaveLAN-II: A High-performance wireless LAN for the unlicensed band. Bell Lab Technical Journal, 118–133 (Summer 1997)Google Scholar
- 5.Lacage, M., et al.: IEEE 802.11 rate adaptation: a practical approach. In: MSWiM 2004 Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, pp. 126–134 (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Baccour, N., Koubâa, A., Youssef, H., Ben Jamâa, M., do Rosário, D., Alves, M., Becker, L.B.: F-LQE: A fuzzy link quality estimator for wireless sensor networks. In: Silva, J.S., Krishnamachari, B., Boavida, F. (eds.) EWSN 2010. LNCS, vol. 5970, pp. 240–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.NITOS wireless testbed, http://nitlab.inf.uth.gr/NITlab/index.php/testbed
- 10.Syrivelis, D., Anadiotis, A.C., Apostolaras, A., Korakis, T., Tassiulas, L.: TLQAP: A Topology and Link Quality Assessment Protocol For Efficient Node Allocation on Wireless Testbeds. In: The Proceedings of WiNTECH 2009, Beijing, China (September 2009)Google Scholar
- 11.PTPD protocol, http://ptpd.sourceforge.net/
- 12.Baccour, N., et al.: A testbed for the evaluation of link quality estimators in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Ettus Research, http://www.ettus.com/
- 15.Radiotap, http://www.radiotap.org/
- 16.GNU Radio wiki, http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki
- 18.Universal Hardware Driver(UHD), http://code.ettus.com/redmine/ettus/projects/uhd/wiki
- 19.Liu, W., et al.: Real-time wide-band spectrum sensing for cognitive radio. In: 2011 18th IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux, SCVT (2011)Google Scholar
- 20.Lee, J., et al.: An experimental study on the capture effect in 802.11a networks. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental Evaluation and Characterization, pp. 19–26Google Scholar