Advertisement

Estimating Complex Refractive Index Using Ellipsometry

  • Gul e Saman
  • Edwin R. Hancock
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8156)

Abstract

The paper is about estimating complex refractive index images of surfaces. Complex refractive index allows both the transmission and absorption properties of a surface to be characterised. Although widely used in applied optics, there has been little work on its use in image processing and surface inspection. In this paper we describe how to compute the complex refractive index of a material using simple digital image measurements. Specifically, a novel technique for estimating complex refractive index using ellipsometry is reported. The method uses a simple experimental setup that relies on the use of raw intensity data. This represents an advantage over the methods used in applied optics. Rather than relying on the calibrated measurement of absorption, instead our method relies on measuring the relative change in reflection amplitude which is a dimensionless quantity.

Keywords

Complex Refractive Index Absorption Extinction Co-efficient Naturally occurring surfaces Manufactured surfaces Photometric stereo Fresnel Theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Bolin, F.P., Preuss, L.E., Taylor, R.C., Ference, R.J.: Refractive Index Estimation Using Polarisation and Photometric Stereo. Applied Optics, Optical Society of America (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsenova, V., Stoykova, E.V.: Refractive index measurement in human tissue samples. In: Proceedings of SPIE (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirckx, J.J.J., Kuypers, L.C., Decraemer, W.F.: Refractive index of tissue measured with confocal microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greenleaf, J.F., Johnson, S.A., Lent, A.H.: Measurement of spatial distribution of refractive index in tissue by ultrasonic computer assisted tomography. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (1978)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunter, W.R.: Error in using the reflectance vs angle of incidence method for measuring optical constants. Journal of the Optical Society of America (1965)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, H., Lu, J.Q., Wooden, W.A., Kragel, P.J., Hu, X.: Refractive indices of human skin tissues at eight wavelengths and estimated dispersion relations between 300 and 1600nm. Journal Physics in Medicine and Biology (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shashar, N., Cronin, T.W., Wolff, L.B., Condon, M.A.: The polarisation of light in a tropical rain forest. The association for Tropical Biology and Conservation (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Land, M.F.: Old twist in a new tale. Nature (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, P., Thomas, M.: Geodesic Light Dome. Department of Computer Science. University of York, UK (2010), http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/-pcc/Circuits/dome Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lai, J.C., Zhang, Y.Y., Li, Z.H., Jiang, H.J., He, A.Z.: Complex refractive index measurement of biological tissues by attenuated total reflection ellipsometry. Applied Optics (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saman, G., Hancock, E.R.: Robust Computation of the Polarisation Image. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IEEE: IEEE Standard for Digitizing Waveform Recorders, IEEE Std 1057-1994 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato, K., Manabe, T., Polivka, J., Ihara, T., Kasashima, Y., Yamaki, K.: Measurement of the complex refractive index of concrete at 57.5 GHz. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gul e Saman
    • 1
  • Edwin R. Hancock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkUK

Personalised recommendations