Speeding Up Local Patch Dissimilarity

  • Radu Tudor Ionescu
  • Marius Popescu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8156)

Abstract

There are many patch-based techniques used in image processing, but most of them are heavy to compute with current machines. A dissimilarity measure for images based on patches, inspired from rank distance, called Local Patch Dissimilarity (LPD), was recently introduced. It has very promising results in optical character recognition, but, as other patch-based methods, it is computationally heavy.

This work aims at showing that LPD can be improved in terms of efficiency. Several ways of optimizing the LPD algorithm are presented, such as using a hash table to store precomputed patch distances or skipping the comparison of overlapping patches. Another way to avoid the problem of the higher computational time on large sets of images is to turn to local learning methods.

Several experiments are conducted on two datasets using both standard machine learning methods and local learning methods. All methods are based on LPD. The obtained results come to support the fact that LPD is a very good dissimilarity measure for images. In this paper, LPD is also used with success for classifying images other than handwritten digits.

Keywords

image dissimilarity image classification handwritten digit recognition patches patch-based technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, S., Roth, D.: Learning a sparse representation for object detection. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes, C., Goldman, D.B., Shechtman, E., Finkelstein, A.: The PatchMatch Randomized Matching Algorithm for Image Manipulation. Communications of the ACM 54(11), 103–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bottou, L., Vapnik, V.: Local Learning Algorithms. Neural Computation 4, 888–900 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, T.S., Avidan, S., Freeman, W.T.: The patch transform. PAMI 32(8), 1489–1501 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conaire, C.O., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A.F.: An Improved Spatiogram Similarity Measure for Robust Object Localisation. In: ICASSP, pp. 1069–1072 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deselaers, T., Keyser, D., Ney, H.: Discriminative Training for Object Recognition using Image Patches. In: CVPR, pp. 157–162 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dinu, L.P., Ionescu, R.-T., Popescu, M.: Local patch dissimilarity for images. In: Huang, T., Zeng, Z., Li, C., Leung, C.S. (eds.) ICONIP 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7663, pp. 117–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Efros, A.A., Freeman, W.T.: Image quilting for texture synthesis and transfer. In: SIGGRAPH 2001, pp. 341–346. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo, G., Dyer, C.R.: Patch-based Image Correlation with Rapid Filtering. In: CVPR (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., Ponce, J.: A Maximum Entropy Framework for Part-Based Texture and Object Recognition. In: ICCV, pp. 832–838 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object Recognition from Local Scale-Invariant Features. In: ICCV, vol. 2, pp. 1150–1157. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shawe-Taylor, J., Cristianini, N.: Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simard, P., LeCun, Y., Denker, J.S., Victorri, B.: Transformation Invariance in Pattern Recognition, Tangent Distance and Tangent Propagation. Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vapnik, V.: Estimation of dependencies based on empirical data (Information Science and Statistics), 2nd edn. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilder, K.J.: Decision tree algorithms for handwritten digit recognition. Electronic Doctoral Dissertations for UMass Amherst (January 1998), http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI9823791
  17. 17.
    Xie, J., Zhang, L., You, J., Zhang, D.: Texture classification via patch-based sparse texton learning. In: ICIP, Hong Kong, China, pp. 2737–2740 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radu Tudor Ionescu
    • 1
  • Marius Popescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations