Skip to main content

Mobile Phone Technology Acceptance and Usability in the Delivery of Health Services among Health Surveillance Assistants in Rural Areas of Malawi

  • Conference paper
  • 1077 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between acceptance and usability of mobile phones in the delivery of health services among Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) in rural areas of Malawi. A questionnaire was distributed to 44 HSAs, however only 38 were returned correctly completed.

Firstly, the results show that HSAs in the area had a positive attitude towards mobile phones (M=5.02, SD=0.901) on a 6 points Likert Scale. Furthermore, the results show that the HSAs attitude was positive irrespective of gender and age. However, the attitude was moderated by level of education. HSAs with Junior Certificate of Education had lower attitude towards mobile phones than those with Malawi Schools Certificate of Education. Secondly, the results show that HSAs perceived usability of the Mobile Phones in support of health delivery services was positive irrespective of gender, age or level of education. Finally, the results showed that there was no significant relationship between mobile phone acceptance and usability among HSAs.

The study was, however, limited to HSAs who had received mobile phones and were residing in the rural villages under study. Further, the study was based on a convenient sample that was dominated by young, male and relatively educated individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ITU Measuring the Information Society. International Telecommunication Union, Place des Nations, Geneva (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, T.B., Croner, C.M., Rushton, G., Brown, C.K., Fowler, L.: Geographic information systems and public health: mapping the future. Public Health Reports (14), 359–373 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voskarides, S., Pattichis, C.S., Istepanian, R., Kyriacou, E., Pattichis, M.S., Schizas, C.N.: Mobile health systems: A brief overview. In: Proc. of SPIE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramachandran, D.L.: Mobile Persuasive Technologies for Rural Health. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Loo, J.F.: Acceptance of Health Services on Mobile Phones, a Study of Consumer Perceptions. A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Information and Library (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagozzi, R., Davis, F., Warshaw, P.: Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7), 659–686 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40, 191–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippeveld, T., Sauerborn, R., Bodart, C.: Design and implementation of health information systems. World Health Organization, Geneva (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Damtew, A.Z.: Analyzing the role of Health Information Systems for enhancement of child health services: A case study from Ethiopia. In: 10th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and Doctoral Colloquium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Millennium Villages Project: Millennium Villages Project: Childcount+- A Community Health Events reporting and Alerts System, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmud, N., Rodriguez, J., Nesbit, J.: Mobiles in Malawi: A text message-based intervention to bridge the patient-physician gap in the rural developing world, GLOBE PULSE. The American Medical Student Association’s International Health Journal 6(1) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blaschke, S., Bokenkamp, K., Cosmaciuc, R., Denby, M., Beza, H., Raymond, S.: Using Mobile Phones to Improve Child Nutrition Surveillance in Malawi: UNICEF Malawi and UNICEF Innovations (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chau, P.Y.K., Hu, P.J.H.: Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Journal of Information Management 39(4), 297–311 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chismar, W.G., Wiley-Patton, S.: Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians? In: 36th Hawaii International Congress on System Sciences, HICSS 2003. IEEE Computer Society, Big Island (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., Speedie, S.M.: Factors influencing health information technology, adoption in Thailand’s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics (8), 404–416 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schaper, L., Pervan, G.: A Model of Information and Communication Technology Acceptance and Utilisation by Occupational Therapists Decision Support in an Uncertain and Complex World: The IFIP TC8/WG8.3 International Conference 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller: Human ease of use criteria and their tradeoffs. IBM Report TR00.2185.Poughkeepsie. IBM, NY (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Bevan, J.: International Standards for HCI, Based on chapter in Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction. Idea Group Publishing, Serco Usability Services, 22 Hand Court, London WC1V 6JF (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO. ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Standardization Organization, Geneva (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fairbanks, R.J., Caplan, S.: Poor Interface Design and Lack of Usability Testing Facilitate Medical Error. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 20(10) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koniuszy, A.: A new method of usability evaluation of agricultural tractors based on optimum working index [OWI], TEKA Kom. Mot. Energ. Roln. – OL PAN, 2008, 8a, pp. 93–99 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sullivan, J.M., Hall, R.H., Hilgers, M.G., Luna, R., Buechler, M.R., Lawrence, W.T.: Iterative Usability Evaluation Methods Applied to Learning Technology Development. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, EDMEDIA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klockar, T., Carr, D.A., Hedman, A., Johansson, T., Bengtsson, F.: Usability of Mobile Phones. Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. User Vision Limited. Focusing on the user experience, Mobile Usability Comparison. Mobile Usability White Paper, 55 North Castle Street, Edinburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaikkonen, A., Kallio, T., Kekäläinen, A., Kankainen, A., Cankar, M.: Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Testing. Journal of Usability Studies 1(1), 4–16 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis, J.R.: IBM Computer usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7(1), 57–78 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Han, S.: Understanding User Adoption of Mobile Technology: Focusing on Physicians in Finland, Doctoral dissertation, Åbo Akademi University, Finland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fusilier, M., Durlabhji, S.: An exploration of student internet use in India the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Campus-Wide Information Systems 22(4), 233–246 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kedia, B.L., Bhagat, R.S.: Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: implications for research in international and comparative management. Academy of Management Review 13(4), 559–571 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avgero, C.: Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review. Journal of Information Technology 23, 133–146 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luo, N., Koh, W., Ng, W., Yau, J.W., Lim, L., Sim, S.S., Tay, E.: Acceptance of Information and Communication Technologies for Healthcare Delivery, a SingHealth Polyclinics Study. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore 38(6), 529–536 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., Cavaye, A.: Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Q 21(3), 279–302 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rigby, M.: Essential prerequisites to the safe and effective widespread roll-out of e-working in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 138–147 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hashizume, A., Kurosu, M., Yamanaka, T.: Relative importance of design and usability of Cell Phone in terms of age and gender. In: International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, Keers, Paris (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Frokjaer, E., Hertzum, M., Hornbaek, K.: Measuring Usability: Are effectiveness, Efficiency and Satisfaction Really Correlated? Computer Human Interaction 2(1), 345–352 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Croll, J.: The Impact of Usability on Clinician Acceptance of Health Information Systems. PhD Thesis submitted to the Centre for Learning Innovation, Faculty of Education, and Queensland University of Technology, Australia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Acton, T., Golden, W., Gudea, S., Scot, M.: Usability and Acceptance in Small-Screen Information Systems. eCollECTeR Conference Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khalika Banda, C., Gombachika, H. (2013). Mobile Phone Technology Acceptance and Usability in the Delivery of Health Services among Health Surveillance Assistants in Rural Areas of Malawi. In: Jonas, K., Rai, I.A., Tchuente, M. (eds) e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries. AFRICOMM 2012. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41178-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41178-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41177-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41178-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics