Skip to main content

An Automated Assessment of Students’ Learning in e-Learning Using Concept Map and Ontology Mapping

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8167))

Abstract

E-learning plays vital role in education and its importance is constantly increasing. The key challenge in the teaching learning process of e-learning is assessing the students’ learning. Learning means the acquisition of knowledge or skills through experience, practice, or study, or by being taught. Assessing the students learning on the topics being taught is very important in e-learning environment. Based on the student’s learning, the system can change / update the pedagogy, recommendations can be made for further study, and the students’ performance can be evaluated. Many e-learning systems assess student learning by conducting tests, quizzes or assignments. In this paper, we propose concept map based on assessment from students’ learning using ontology mapping. Concept map is an effective tool for determining what a student knows in the topic covered. The concept map created by the student is converted into ontology and is then mapped with the reference ontology created by the expert. The experimental evaluation is presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education 14(2), 129–135 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huitt, W.: Bloom et al.’s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. In: Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta State University, Valdosta (2011), http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/bloom.html[pdf] (retrieved April 28, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghauth, K.I., Abdullah, N.A.: An empirical evaluation of learner performance in e-learning recommender systems and an adaptive hypermedia system. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science 23(3), 141–152 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Razzouk, N.Y., Razzouk, J.N.: Analysis in Teaching with Cases: A Revisit to Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Objectives. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal (CTMS) 4(1), 49–56 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angelo, T.A., Cross, K.P.: Classroom assessment techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly, D.: Do you know what your students are learning (And do you care?). In: O’Neill, G., Moore, S., McMullin, B. (eds.) Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. AISHE, Dublin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garrison, C., Ehringhaus, M.: Formative and summative assessments in the classroom (2007), http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx (retrieved)

  8. Marzano, R.J.: Formative assessment & standards-based grading. [Webinar] (2009), http://www.marzanoresearch.com/documents/FASBG_Webinar_11_13.pdf (retrieved)

  9. Willoughby, J.: Differentiating instruction: Meeting students where they are (2012), http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/subject/di_meeting.phtml (retrieved)

  10. Gabrilovich, E., Markovitch, S.: Computing Semantic Relatedness using Wikipedia-based Explicit Semantic Analysis. IJCAI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novak, J.D.: Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dias, R.: Concept Map: a strategy for enhancing reading comprehension in english as L2. In: Sánchez, J., Cañas, A.J., Novak, J.D. (eds.) Proceeding of Fourth Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, Viña del Mar, Chile (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson-Beck, V.: Assessing classroom assessment techniques. Active Learning in Higher Education 12(2), 125–132 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cauley, K.M., McMillan, J.H.: Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 83(1), 1–6 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lauer, T.E.: Improving the Learning Process for Both Instructor and Student Using Assessments. Fisheries 37(2), 76–79 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical report, Pensacola, Florida (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grundspenkis, J.: Concept maps as knowledge assessment tool: results of practical use of intelligent knowledge assessment system. Paper Presented at the IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, Rome, Italy, pp. 20–22 (November 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graudina, V., Grundspenkis, J.: Algorithm of Concept Map Transformation to Ontology for Usage in Intelligent Knowledge Assessment System. In: International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech 2011), Austria, vol. (16-17), pp. 109–114 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ivanova, T.: Adaptive Open Corpus E-Learning аnd Authoring, Using Collaborative ontology Learning. In: Proc. ICETA 2011of 9th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, pp. 83–87 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anohina-Naumeca, A., Grundspenkis, J., Strautmane, M.: The concept map-based assessment system: functional capabilities, evolution, and experimental results. Int. J. Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning 21(4), 308–327 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bittencourt, I.I., Costa, E., Silva, M., Soares, E.: A computational model for developing semantic web-based educational systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 22, 302–315 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teo, C.B., Gay, R.K.L.: A Knowledge-Driven Model to Personalize E-Learning. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing 6(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lau, R., Song, D., Li, Y., Cheung, T., Hao, J.: Towards a fuzzy domain ontology extraction method for adaptive e-learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21(6), 800–813 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreira-Satler, M., Romero, F.P., Menendez, V.H., Zapata, A., Prieto, M.E.: A fuzzy ontology approach to represent user profiles in e-learning environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), pp. 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shishehchi, S., Banihashem, S.Y., Zin, N.A.M., Noah, S.A.M., Malaysia, K.: Ontological approach in knowledge based recommender system to develop the quality of e-learning system. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 6(2), 115–123 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gladun, A., Rogushina, J., Martínez-Béjar, R., Fernández-Breis, J.T.: An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), 1922–1931 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cuéllar, M.P., Delgado, M., Pegalajar, M.C.: Improving learning management through semantic web and social networks in e-learning environments. Expert Systems with Applications 38(4), 4181–4189 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moule, P.: Challenging the five-stage model for e-learning: a new approach. Research in Learning Technology 15(1), 37–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, P.-H., Hwang, G.-J., Milrad, M., Ke, H.-R., Huang, Y.-M.: An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. British Journal of Educational Technology 43(2), 217–232 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumaran, V.S., Sankar, A. (2013). An Automated Assessment of Students’ Learning in e-Learning Using Concept Map and Ontology Mapping. In: Wang, JF., Lau, R. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013. ICWL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8167. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41174-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41175-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics