The Comparison of Selected Risk Management Methods for Project Management

  • Vladěna Obrová
  • Lenka Smolíková
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 413)


Project management is a set of validated and described procedures that comprehensively solve the implementation and management of defined activities that relate to a specific project. In the Czech Republic, the issue of risk management in projects often neglected and began to be more used to the ESF projects where is the risk management required. There are used most often for risk analysis 3 methods - sensitivity analysis, RIPRAN method, scoring method. The following article focuses on risk management methods that are not used in common practice immediately concern to project risk management. The benefit of this paper is the connection between methods used in project management and the methods of risk analysis. The result is an overview of the main advantages and disadvantages of these methods and the possibility of their use in different phases of the project, taking into account the time and cost effectiveness.


project management risk management ETA HRA FMEA comparison 


  1. 1.
    Conroy, G., Soltan, H.: ConSERV, a project specific risk management concept. International Journal of Project Management 16, 353–366 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raz, T., Michael, E.: Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International Journal of Project Management 19, 9–17 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, P.G., Merritt, G.M.: Proactive Risk Management: Controlling Uncertainty in Product Development. Productivity Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, X., Chen, Q.: Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37, 197–206 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AFNOR: Norma FD X 50-117 Management des Risques d’un Project (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Courtot, H.: La gestion des risiques dans les projects. Edition Economica, Paris (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Courtot, H.: Quelques renseignements liés à la mise en oeuvre d’une démarche de gestion des risques dans les projets. La Cible-A.F.I.T.E.P. 74 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant, K.P., Cashman, W.M., Christensen, D.S.: Delivering projects on time. Research & Technology Management 49, 52–58 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, P.: Managing risk as product development schedules shrink. Research Technology Management 42, 25–32 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D.: Risk management, project success, and technological un-certainty. R&D Management 32, 101–109 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Korecký, M., Trkovský, V.: Management rizik projektů. Grada Publishing, Praha (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tichý, M.: Ovládání rizika: analýza a management. C.H. Beck, Praha (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nenadal, K.: Moderní systémy řízení jakosti. Quality Management. Management Press, Praha (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeman, M.: Diplomová práce. Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Fakulta technologická, Ústav výrobního inženýrství, Zlín (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doležal, J., Mácha, P., Lacko, B.A.: Kolektiv: Projektový management podle IPMA. Grada Publishing, Praha (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smejkal, V., Rais, K.: Řízení rizik ve firmách a jiných organizacích. Grada, Praha (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladěna Obrová
    • 1
  • Lenka Smolíková
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and ManagementBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations